Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Supported in part from the National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grants T32 AI007470, T32 AI007610, and American Liver Foundation (to V.M.V.); EVC/CFAR Immunology Core P30 AI050409 (to C.I., A.G.); Yerkes Research Center Base Grant RR-00165, and Public Health Service DK083356 and AI070101 (to A.G.).
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a serious disease that can result in numerous long-term complications leading to liver failure or death. Approximately 80% of people fail to clear their infection, largely as the result of weak, narrowly targeting or waning antiviral T-cell responses. Although professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) like dendritic cells (DCs) might serve as targets for modulation of T-cell immunity, the particular role of DCs in immunity to HCV is not known. Moreover the identity, phenotype, and functional characteristics of such populations in the liver, the site of HCV replication, have proven difficult to elucidate. Using a multicolor flow-based approach, we identified six distinct populations of professional APCs among liver interstitial leukocytes isolated from uninfected and HCV-infected patients. Although a generalized enrichment of DCs in the liver compared to blood was observed for all patients, HCV infection was characterized by a significant increase in the frequency of intrahepatic myeloid DCs (both CD1c+ and CD141+). Phenotypic analyses of liver plasmacytoid (pDC) and myeloid DCs (mDC) further revealed the HCV-induced expression of maturation molecules CD80, CD83, CD40, and programmed death ligand-1. Importantly, pDC and mDCs from HCV-infected liver were capable of secreting effector cytokines, interferon-alpha and interleukin-12, respectively, in response to Toll-like receptor stimulation in vitro. Conclusion: Chronic HCV infection facilitates the “customized” recruitment of liver DC subsets with established functional roles in antigen presentation. These DCs are characterized by a mature, activated phenotype and are functionally responsive to antigenic stimulation in vitro. Such findings highlight an important paradox surrounding liver DC recruitment during HCV infection, where despite their activation these cells do not provide adequate protection from the virus. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;56:2071–2081(
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Approximately 170 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV).1 Of those infected, 80% will develop lifelong infection characterized by progressive liver disease with significant risk for developing cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure.2 For these individuals, chronic HCV infection is thought to be a consequence of immune failure, where delayed, weak, and narrowly targeting CD4+ T cell responses are associated with an antiviral CD8+ T-cell response that fails.3–6 One possibility is that the observed defects in T-cell function are a result of inefficient priming. For this reason there is increasing interest in the innate activation of professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs) during infection, and the context with which these cells present HCV-derived antigens to T cells.7 Importantly, DCs represent potential therapeutic targets for HCV and other chronic diseases where novel strategies for immune modulation would prove beneficial.8–10
Evidence modestly supports the notion that impairment in DC fate or function might contribute to HCV pathogenesis. There is a clear decline in the frequency of circulating plasmacytoid (pDC) and myeloid DC (mDC) populations during the acute and chronic phases of HCV infection.11 Observations of pDC function also suggested that pDCs from HCV-infected patients produce less interferon-alpha (IFN-α) when compared to healthy subjects.12 Conflicting reports, however, have suggested that such alterations in pDC function may be due to decreased frequencies of circulating DCs, as similar levels of IFN production were seen when pDCs were evaluated on a per-cell basis.13, 14 Similarly, whereas several initial studies demonstrated HCV-associated defects in mDC maturation, cytokine secretion, and allostimulation, other studies have failed to corroborate such findings to a similar degree.11, 13, 15–19
It is possible that reduced DC frequencies and the seemingly contradictory assessment of DC function in some studies reflect aberrant trafficking patterns, or the HCV-induced migration of functionally mature cells from blood to liver.20 Unfortunately, our current understanding of intrahepatic DC fate and function during HCV infection remains somewhat rudimentary, stagnating largely as a consequence of the technological hurdles associated with the study of human intrahepatic DCs in general. Nevertheless, early immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based studies have demonstrated DC accumulation in the liver during HCV infection, an observation consistent with a study by Wertheimer et al.14, 20 also showing that DCs are enriched in the liver compared to peripheral blood. The latter study also showed that this enrichment was not specific to HCV-infection per se, because liver DC enrichment was observed in uninfected and HCV-infected individuals.14 Such studies suggest that in order to understand a role for DCs in local immunity to HCV, one must distinguish virus-specific effects on DC recruitment, differentiation, and function from the potentially enigmatic effects of generalized liver inflammation.21 To date, limited studies exist that address this issue.
Here we used a flow cytometry-based approach to identify APC populations present in human liver, and to highlight those with a role in the antiviral response to HCV. In total, six phenotypically distinct populations of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR+ professional APCs were identified in the liver of uninfected and HCV-infected individuals with progressive liver disease. Although a generalized enrichment for mDCs in the liver compared to blood was observed for all patients, an enrichment of mDCs in the livers of HCV-infected individuals was much more profound. In addition, HCV infection also correlated with a significant increase in the frequency of intrahepatic mDCs (both CD1c+ and CD141+ DCs), and the expression of accessory molecules CD80, CD83, CD40, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) by intrahepatic pDC and mDC subsets. Importantly, intrahepatic DCs from HCV-infected patients showed no defect in their ability to secrete effector cytokines IFN-α and interleukin (IL)-12 in response to antigenic stimulation in vitro. Taken together, these findings highlight dual potential roles for intrahepatic DCs in nonspecific liver disease progression, and in the local initiation and/or regulation of HCV-specific host responses.
A total of 33 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation at Emory University Hospital were enrolled in the study in accordance with the Emory University Immune Monitoring Protocol (IRB# 00006248). Patient characteristics are summarized in Supporting Tables 1 and 2. Informed consent was obtained in writing from each patient and Institutional Review Board (IRB) #00006248 conforms to the guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
For PBMCs, 50-70 mL of blood was collected in cell preparation tubes (BD Vacutainer, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and processed for PBMCs according to the manufacturer's instructions. For LIMCs, intact corner lobes of explanted recipient liver specimens (100 g) were excised at the time of recipient hepatectomy. Lobes were perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the tissue was cut into small pieces (<0.5 cm in diameter) and digested for 60 minutes at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 (Lonza, Allendale, NJ) containing 0.2% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ). The digested material was strained through sterile cheesecloth, pelleted, and washed in RPMI 1640+ 10% FCS/PS. Purified LIMCs were extracted by Percoll (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) density centrifugation.
Four overlapping panels with antibodies to CD3 (Pacific Blue, HIT3a, Biolegend, San Diego, CA), CD19 (Pacific Blue, HIB19, Biolegend), CD56 (Pacific Blue, MEM-188, Biolegend), CD11c (Biotin, 3.9, Biolegend), CD14 (PerCPCy5.5, HCD14, Biolegend), CD16 (APCH7, 3G8, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), HLA-DR (PECy7, L243, BD Biosciences), CD123 (FITC, 6H6, Biolegend), CD34 (PE, 4H11, Biolegend) eBioscience, CD34 (FITC, 581, BD Biosciences), CD1c (APC, AD5-8E7, Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), CD141 (APC, AD5-14H12, Miltenyi Biotec), and CD33 (APC, WM53, Biolegend), and CD303 (APC, AC144, Miltenyi Biotec) were used simultaneously. PBMCs and LIMCs were blocked in 20% NAB human serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 20 minutes at 4°C, then incubated with fluorophore-conjugated and biotinylated primary antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C. After two washes the cells were incubated with streptavidin-conjugated Qdot-605 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 30 minutes at 4°C. After two washes the stained cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 minutes at 4°C.
PE-conjugated antibodies to CD40 (53C, Biolegend), CD80 (Clone L307.4, BD Pharmingen, La Jolla, CA), CD83 (HB15e, BD Pharmingen), CD86 (FUN-1, BD Pharmingen), PD-L1 (MIH-1, BD Pharmingen), and IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes (BD Pharmingen) were used with the panels described above. Fluorescence minus one controls were used in each experiment to aid in phenotyping autofluorescent cell populations. A 407 nm laser and a 475LP 525/50 BP filter set were used to identify autofluorescent cell populations and extraneous cellular debris. Samples were run on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using Flow Jo Software (Treestar, Ashland, OR).
Intracellular Cytokine Staining.
PBMCs and LIMCs were cultured at a concentration of 10 million cells/mL in RPMI 1640 solution +10% FCS/PS. Each sample was unstimulated, or stimulated with 1 μg/mL of LPS, or 5 μg/mL of R-837 (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA) for 12 hours at 37°C. One μL/mL Golgi plug (BD Biosciences) was added after 1 hour. After 12 total hours, cells were stained with antibodies to surface molecules CD3 (Pacific Blue, HIT3a), CD19 (Pacific Blue, HIB19), CD56 (Pacific Blue, MEM-188), HLA-DR (PECy7, L243), CD14 (PerCPCy5.5, HCD14), CD11c (Biotin, 3.9), CD1c (APC, AD5-8E7), and CD123 (FITC, 6H6), allowing for subset identification, followed by incubation with streptavidin-conjugated Qdot-605 in a secondary staining step. Intracellular detection of IFN-α (PE, Clone LT27:295, Miltenyi Biotec), IL-12/23 p40/70 (PE, Clone C8.6, eBioscience), or isotype control antibodies (BD Biosciences) was done according to Inside Stain Kit manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). The toxicity of individual stimulation conditions was assessed using live/dead fixable aqua (Life Technologies).
Intrahepatic APC Compartment Is Distinct and Comprised of Six Primary Subsets.
Postulating that local defects in antigen presentation might be contributing to immune failure in HCV-infected patients, we set out to identify intrahepatic APCs with potential involvement in this process. Given the heterogeneous nature of human APC subsets and an overall lack of knowledge concerning liver-resident APCs, we used a flow cytometry-based characterization strategy that would identify intrahepatic APCs based on the phenotypic expression of HLA-DR. We then dissected the HLA-DR+ parent population into smaller, phenotypically distinct subpopulations for further study.
Surface staining of LIMCs from an HCV-infected patient revealed a large population of HLA-DR+ cells lacking lymphocyte lineage markers CD3, CD56, and CD19 (Fig. 1). Within this parent population, six distinct subpopulations of professional APCs were identified, defined by their expression of CD303 (CD303+ plasmacytoid DCs, CD303+ CD123++ CD11c− CD1c−), CD1c (CD1c+ myeloid DCs, CD1c++, CD11c++, CD14+/−, CD123+), CD16 (CD16+CD14+ cells, CD16+, CD14+, CD11c++, CD123+), CD14 (CD16-negative CD14+ cells, CD14++, CD16−, CD11c++, CD123+), CD141 (CD141+ myeloid DCs, CD141++, CD11c+, CD14−, CD123+, CD34−, CD33+), and CD34 (CD34+ cells, CD34+, CD141+/−, CD11c+, CD14+, CD123+, CD33+/−) (Fig. 1).
Following identification of the six liver subsets, we noted a number of similarities and differences between peripheral blood and liver APC compartments. Five of the six liver populations were phenotypically identical to peripheral blood monocyte and DC subsets. These included CD303+ pDCs, CD16+/− CD14+ cells (monocyte/Kupffer), and two populations of mDCs (CD1c+ and CD141+). The remaining population, termed “CD34+,” was phenotypically distinct from the well-characterized population of CD34+ cells commonly observed in peripheral blood.22–24
Although peripheral blood CD34+ cells express HLA-DR but lack all lineage markers, the intrahepatic CD34+ population demonstrated phenotypic similarities to a number of myeloid lineage cells through their expression of CD14, CD11c, CD141, and CD33 (CD33 expression not shown). In fact, lineage negative CD34+ cells were largely undetectable in the liver compartment (accounting for <0.5% of the HLA-DR+ parent when observed). Also undetectable in liver was a previously described population of peripheral blood mDCs expressing CD16, noted for their tendency to secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α).22 Together, the data show that the liver APC compartment was distinct from that of peripheral blood, and comprised of numerous interstitial DC subsets with potential involvement in the antiviral response to HCV.
Chronic Liver Disease Is Characterized by an Abundance of Intrahepatic Myeloid DCs, Irrespective of HCV Status.
We next sought to better understand the role of the liver microenvironment on local DC recruitment. Assuming that the HCV-infected liver microenvironment would differ from that of uninfected liver during similar stages of advanced liver disease, we compared peripheral blood and liver DC frequencies in uninfected and HCV-infected patients (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, we observed a generalized enrichment of CD1c+ and CD141+ mDC subsets in liver for all patients irrespective of HCV status, signifying a potential role for mDCs in liver disease progression or, conversely, a role for liver disease progression (i.e., inflammation) in the nonspecific recruitment of mDCs (Fig. 2A). Importantly, the most pronounced increase in intrahepatic mDC frequencies compared to blood was observed in HCV-infected patients, consistent with a dual role for these cells in the initiation of adaptive host responses. CD141+ DCs in particular have known functional roles in viral antigen cross-presentation to T cells.25, 26 Taken together, subset analyses of peripheral blood and liver compartments demonstrated an association between progressive liver disease and intrahepatic mDC recruitment, and an HCV-specific enhancement of mDC recruitment.
Chronic HCV Infection Is Characterized by an Increase in Intrahepatic mDCs Over pDCs, CD14+ Cells, and CD34+ Cells.
Although the enrichment of mDC populations in HCV-infected liver suggested a potential role for these cells in local HCV-specific responses, it remained plausible that mDC enrichment was an indirect manifestation of HCV-related liver pathology rather than virus-mediated DC recruitment. We therefore wanted to identify other HCV-mediated changes in the intrahepatic APC compartment overall, through direct comparisons of the six identified populations in uninfected and HCV-infected patients (Fig. 2). When compared, HCV infection was again characterized by a significant increase in the frequency of intrahepatic mDCs (both CD1c+ and CD141+DCs) and a slight decrease in the frequency of CD14+ cells (Fig. 2B). Strikingly, we observed a 10-fold higher frequency of “cross-presenting” CD141+ mDCs in HCV-infected liver compared to uninfected liver (Fig. 2B), suggesting the potential involvement of these cells in the local antiviral response.
In contrast, we observed no difference in the frequency of intrahepatic CD303+ pDCs between cohorts (P = 0.32), consistent with blood to liver comparisons that showed that pDCs were not enriched in the liver compartment of chronically infected individuals (Fig. 2A). In addition, while a role for intrahepatic CD34+ cells in host immune responses is not yet known, a drastic decrease in the frequency of CD34+ cells among HLA-DR+ cells was observed in HCV-infected liver (Fig. 2B). Importantly, the proportional representation of the six liver APC subsets in individual patients was consistent with the observed differences in frequency between patient cohorts (Fig. 2C). It should be noted that a 2-3-fold increase in LIMC numbers per gram of liver tissue was observed in HCV-infected liver compared to uninfected liver (Supporting Figs. S1, S2). When comparisons of total intrahepatic APC numbers per gram of liver tissue were evaluated, myeloid liver DCs were again observed enriched within HCV-infected liver compared to uninfected liver (Supporting Figs. S1, S2). In all, the data showed that HCV infection facilitated the recruitment or differentiation of hepatic mDC populations over pDCs, CD14+ cells and CD34+ cells.
Chronic HCV Infection Is Characterized by an Increase of Intrahepatic DCs Displaying a Mature, Activated Phenotype.
Our data show that progressive liver disease and HCV infection alike each result in the enrichment of intrahepatic mDCs over pDCs. We theorized, however, that HCV could still facilitate the virus-specific maturation and/or activation of either subset, when present in liver, regardless of frequency. We therefore assessed the maturation status of pDC and mDC populations in uninfected and HCV-infected liver, and tested whether these cells expressed ligands with accessory function for antigen-presentation to T cells (Fig. 3).
The three liver DC populations were each characterized for the expression of costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, CD83, CD86, and PD-L1 within individual patients (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, an increase in the frequency of both pDC and mDC populations expressing CD40, CD80, CD83, and PD-L1 was observed in the liver of HCV-infected patients (Fig. 3B). Consistent with our hypothesis, the frequencies of intrahepatic CD303+ pDCs was not found to be substantially different between uninfected and HCV-infected patients, yet a higher frequency of these cells expressed CD40, CD80, and CD83 in HCV-infected liver (Fig. 3B). Importantly, the frequency of intrahepatic CD1c+ DCs expressing CD40, CD80, CD83, and PD-L1 and of CD141+ DCs expressing CD40, CD83, and PD-L1 was also increased in HCV-infected patients (Fig. 3B), demonstrating the HCV-mediated activation of these subsets.
Intrahepatic DCs Isolated From HCV-Infected Liver Are Functionally Responsive.
Although it was apparent that intrahepatic DCs from HCV-infected patients were capable of antigen-induced maturation in vivo, whether these cells had the potential to be functionally responsive to antigenic stimulation was not known. To assess their functional potential, we compared the responsiveness of blood and liver DCs to overnight stimulation of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and TLR-7 stimulation by a synthetic RNA analog, R837. We then compared the ability of pDCs and mDCs from uninfected and HCV-infected individuals to secrete effector cytokines IFN-α and IL-12 (p40/70), respectively (Fig. 4A,B). In uninfected patients and HCV-infected patients alike, we found the frequency of IFN-α producing pDCs in liver to be comparable to that of blood, demonstrating no decrease in functional responsiveness for intrahepatic pDCs in either cohort. Importantly, when the function of intrahepatic pDCs from uninfected and HCV-infected patients was compared, similar antigen-specific responsiveness to TLR-7 stimulation was again observed (Fig. 4C). In all, these data show that no differences in intrahepatic pDC function, either by the frequency of IFN-α-producing cells or in the amount produced per cell (data not shown), was observed between uninfected and HCV-infected patients (Fig. 4C).
IL-12 production by CD1c+ DCs followed similar to the previously observed enrichment of mDCs in the liver of uninfected and HCV-infected liver patients (Fig. 4D). Again, when IL-12 production by CD1c+ DCs was assessed, the proportion of CD1c+ DCs that showed responsiveness to TLR-7 agonist R-837 was significantly increased in the liver compared to blood for all patients irrespective of HCV status (Fig. 4D). When liver-to-liver comparisons were made, we observed no difference in the percentage of intrahepatic CD1c+ DCs that produced IL-12 in response to stimulation (or in the amount of IL-12 produced per cell; data not shown) (Fig. 4D). Together, our data demonstrate that intrahepatic pDC and mDC populations alike are responsive to antigenic stimulation in vitro through the secretion of effector cytokines. Importantly, no defect in cytokine production by intrahepatic DCs was observed in chronically infected HCV patients.
To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive description of human liver APCs. The “top down” approach used in this study has allowed us to highlight a number of key differences between peripheral blood and liver APC compartments, and compare the phenotypic and functional properties of these cells between uninfected and HCV-infected patients. Each comparison was necessary for the successful identification of intrahepatic APCs with a potential role in HCV immunity that is separate from a more general role in liver disease. Importantly, our data show that recruitment and activation of liver APCs during chronic HCV infection is not necessarily sufficient for the initiation of successful antiviral responses. Rather, in the case of HCV the activation of intrahepatic DCs may in fact serve as a double-edged sword, contributing both to the development of cellular immunity (although failing) and to the pathological advancement HCV-mediated liver inflammation.
Overall, we found substantial overlap of blood and liver APC compartments. In both compartments, CD14+ cells (both CD16+ and CD16−) were the dominant population of HLA-DR+ cells, consistent with an important role for these cells in immune surveillance and innate immune activation. Intrahepatic 303+, CD1c+, and CD141+ DC populations were also phenotypically identical to those observed in peripheral blood.23, 27 Although we did not readily observe lineage negative CD34+ cells in liver, the potential significance of a partially differentiated population of intrahepatic CD34+ cells that is phenotypically distinct from peripheral blood CD34+ cells is intriguing.
One possibility is that viral or inflammation-mediated differentiation of the lineage negative fraction is occurring in liver, and that the observed intrahepatic CD34+ cells represent “precursor” populations in intermediate stages of hematopoiesis. It is curious that HCV infection was associated with a decrease in the frequency of intrahepatic CD34+ cells, and also an increase in the frequency of intrahepatic mDCs. Although there is some evidence that HCV might actually target CD34+ progenitor cells, the idea that HCV itself might promote the local differentiation CD34+ cells to specific APC subsets, however, is nonetheless controversial.28 Differences in trafficking patterns and migratory properties of circulating DCs and CD34+ subsets could also account for the observed differences in compartmentalization. It is also noteworthy that while the CD34+ cells are proportionally underrepresented by frequency, they are nonetheless still populating HCV-infected liver when total numbers of infiltrating mononuclear cells are taken into account. Efforts by our laboratory to understand the role of this liver-resident population and any genotypic or functional relatedness to other, more characterized populations of liver APCs are ongoing.
Current HCV therapy involves the combined use of antiviral drugs and IFN-α, and the efficaciousness of this approach in some individuals suggests (albeit indirectly) that a deficiency of IFN-α availability in the liver may exist.7 Yet no apparent deficiency of pDC trafficking to the liver was observed in this study, where the frequencies of pDCs in the liver compartment of both uninfected and HCV-infected individuals were comparable. Even more perplexing is the observation that pDCs isolated from the liver of uninfected and HCV-infected individuals show similar responsiveness to antigenic stimulation in vitro, through the secretion of IFN-α. Taken together, however there is modest phenotypic evidence remaining that would suggest that these cells may have alternative fates following migration to the liver, depending on the presence or absence of HCV infection within that microenvironment. Although pDC function was apparently maintained by intrahepatic pDCs during HCV infection, a larger frequency of these cells was also phenotypically mature, suggesting a direct effect of the virus on the activation state of these cells. Whether HCV-specific activation and maintenance of local pDC responsiveness is helpful for low-level control of viremia (i.e., maintenance of a virological set point), or the recruitment of cellular responders like CD1c+ DCs, is not known.
We do, however, postulate that CD1c+ DCs have a more general role in the inflammatory process of progressive liver disease.22, 29 Unlike pDCs, CD1c+ cells were enriched in the liver of both uninfected and HCV-infected individuals. Also increasing in both patient cohorts were the frequencies of CD1c+ DCs in the liver that showed responsiveness to TLR stimulation in vitro through the secretion of IL-12. Yet two points of evidence suggest a second potential role for these cells in local immunity to HCV. First, the frequency of these cells in HCV-infected liver was significantly higher to that observed in uninfected liver. Second, of the three liver DC subsets, CD1c+ DCs expressed the highest number of accessory molecules in the context of HCV infection.
With respect to HCV-specific roles, one might postulate that accessory molecules expressed by intrahepatic CD1c+ DCs could modulate local antiviral T-cell responses, through inhibitory receptors such as programmed death-1 (PD-1). Previous work from our laboratory and others has shown that the impaired proliferation of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells is associated with, and reversed by, antibody blockade of the PD-1 pathway.3, 30 Heightened expression of T-cell regulators cytotoxic T lymphocyte attenuator-4 (CTLA-4), natural killer receptor 2B4, and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (TIM-3) has also been associated with T-cell exhaustion during chronic HCV infection31–34; therefore, it is logical that CD1c+ DC expression of ligands for these receptors might be culpable in the influence of effector “helper” and cytotoxic T-cell responses.
Lastly, the dramatic recruitment of “cross-presenting” CD141+ DCs to HCV-infected liver is perhaps the most compelling evidence to suggest a role for intrahepatic mDCs in the local immune response to HCV. CD141+ DCs would be considered ideal targets for therapeutic intervention, given their extremely high frequency in HCV-infected liver.25, 26 Novel strategies employing the use of TLR-agonists, cytokines, and DCs as therapy for HCV are currently being sought and may likely serve useful.10, 35 Although a higher percentage of intrahepatic CD141+ DCs were found to express costimulatory molecules in the context of HCV-infection, the frequency of these cells displaying a mature, activated phenotype was considerably lower than the other two liver DC populations by comparison. Whether reduced expression of DC maturation markers is a general characteristic of intrahepatic CD141+ DCs, and whether this subset is functionally effective for viral antigen uptake, processing, and presentation to CD8+ T cells is not known. Efforts to better understand their potency for modulating CD8+ T cells through antigen presentation are currently ongoing by our laboratory.
In conclusion, it remains to be determined whether the overall function of liver DCs has the potential to be favorable toward the induction of HCV-specific T-cell immunity when studied in greater detail. Despite the observed functional potential of intrahepatic pDC and mDC populations in vitro, it should be cautioned that we do not yet know whether DCs residing within the obscure “HCV liver microenvironment” function to stimulate immunity, tolerance, or exacerbate inflammation. It may also be difficult to interpret their relevance with respect to HCV pathogenesis, or protection, with cross-sectional analysis alone. Given that our cohort of HCV patients were already chronically infected, it is likely that such seemingly functional populations could be rendered impaired or functionally tolerogenic in vivo, through effects of the local cytokine milieu or crosstalk with other liver-resident cell types. An alternative possibility is that intrahepatic DCs in HCV-infected liver are both functional and immunogenic in character, but temporal delays in their recruitment does not allow for them to keep up with an already established infection. For this reason we feel that our study would be complemented well by longitudinal studies of intrahepatic DCs capable of elucidating these possibilities, although we understand such studies are difficult to perform. Nevertheless, any future studies that can make distinctions between liver DC potential and function, and elucidate their relevance to tolerance, immunity, and liver disease progression, would be infinitely beneficial for the design of therapeutic strategies targeting such populations.
The authors thank Hannah Scarborough, Elizabeth Elrod, Beth Begley, Shine Thomas, and the Emory Transplant clinical group for technical assistance and patient coordination. We thank the Emory Pathology Department, especially Palin Bagci, Alton B. Farris III, and Volkan Adsay, for help with the acquisition of liver biopsies. We thank John Altman, Kiran Gill, and the Immunology Core for flow cytometry services and the maintenance of equipment. We also thank the study subjects who generously agreed to participate.