Notice: Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 27th February from 09:00-14:00 GMT / 04:00-09:00 EST / 17:00-22:00 SGT for essential maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Supported in part by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Keio Gijuku Academic Development Funds.
Chemokine receptors mediate migration of immune cells into the liver, thereby promoting liver inflammation. C-C motif chemokine receptor (CCR) 9+ macrophages are crucial in the pathogenesis of acute liver inflammation, but the role and underlying mechanisms of this macrophage subset in chronic liver injury and subsequent liver fibrosis are not fully understood. We confirmed that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)-producing CCR9+ macrophages accumulated during the initiation of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver injury, and CCR9 deficiency attenuated the degree of liver damage. Accumulation of CCR9+ macrophages persisted prominently during the process of liver fibrosis induced by repetitive CCl4 or thioacetamide (TAA)/leptin administration. Increased CCR9 expression was also found on activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Importantly, experimental liver fibrosis was significantly ameliorated in CCR9−/− mice compared with wild-type (WT) mice, assessed by α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) immunostain, Sirius red staining, and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of α-SMA, collagen 1α1, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1. Accumulated CD11b+ macrophages in CCl4-treated WT mice showed marked increases in TNF, NO synthase-2, and TGF-β1 mRNA expression compared with CCR9−/− mice, implying proinflammatory and profibrogenic properties. Hepatic CD11b+ macrophages from CCl4-treated WT mice (i.e., CCR9+ macrophages), but not CD8+ T lymphocytes or non-CD11b+ cells, significantly activated HSCs in vitro compared with those from CCR9−/− mice. TNF-α or TGF-β1 antagonism attenuated CCR9+ macrophage-induced HSC activation. Furthermore, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) 25 mediated migration and, to a lesser extent, activation of HSCs in vitro. Conclusion: Accumulated CD11b+ macrophages are critical for activating HSCs through the CCR9/CCL25 axis and therefore promote liver fibrosis. CCR9 antagonism might be a novel therapeutic target for liver fibrosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;)
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Cirrhosis, the endstage of hepatic fibrosis subsequent to chronic liver inflammation, is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is caused by various etiologies including viral, metabolic, autoimmune, and cholestatic diseases.1, 2 Progression of liver fibrosis occurs due to repeated hepatic wound healing and regeneration, with a prominent feature being recruitment of immunomodulatory cells including monocytes, lymphocytes, and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) to the site of liver injury.3, 4 Hepatic resident macrophages (i.e., Kupffer cells) and recruited inflammatory monocytes release factors including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) to activate HSCs.3, 5, 6 These monocytes/macrophages can influence liver fibrogenesis.7, 8
Several chemokine/chemokine receptor pathways have been reported to be crucial for the occurrence of liver fibrosis. C-C motif chemokine receptor (CCR)1, CCR2, CCR5, and CCR8 mediate monocyte and/or simultaneous HSC recruitment and promote liver fibrosis.9-11 In contrast, C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor (CX3CR)1 mediates antifibrotic processes.12-14
Thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK, later designated CCL25) was identified as a novel chemokine in 1997, and is chemotactic for lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), and activated macrophages.15 Together with CCR9,16 the CCR9/CCL25 chemokine axis has been a focus of studies investigating its functions on lymphocytes and DCs in terms of maturation,15, 17 gut-homing characteristics,18, 19 and the maintenance of immunological tolerance.20 In humans, CCR9-expressing lymphocytes may be involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease21 and primary sclerosing cholangitis.22 The immunological roles of CCR9-expressing monocytes/macrophages were not elucidated until recently, when we demonstrated an essential role of CCR9+ macrophages to establish acute liver injury in multiple murine models.23 In the present study, using murine experimental models of liver fibrosis, we demonstrated an essential role of the CCR9/CCL25 axis in chronic liver inflammation and liver fibrogenesis, and examined how CCR9+ macrophages activate HSCs and promote liver fibrosis.
C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice were purchased from Japan CLEA (Tokyo, Japan), and TNFRsf1a−/− mice (C57BL/6 background) from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). CCR9−/− mice (C57BL/6 background) were previously described.24 Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Animal Care Facility of Keio University School of Medicine. Experiments were performed with age- and sex-matched mice at 8-12 weeks of age. All experiments were approved by the regional Animal Study Committees and were performed according to institutional guidelines.
Induction of Acute and Chronic Liver Injury and Liver Fibrosis.
To induce acute liver injury, mice received an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 0.6 mL/kg body weight of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) mixed with olive oil, and were sacrificed at 24 hours after IP. To induce liver fibrosis, 0.2 mL/kg CCl4 was injected three times weekly for 6 weeks. As a second model, 200 mg/kg thioacetamide (TAA; Sigma Aldrich) plus 1 mg/kg leptin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was injected three times weekly for 4 weeks as previously described.25 Mice were sacrificed 24 hours after the last administration.
Assessment of Liver Injury and Liver Fibrosis.
Livers were removed, fixed in 10% formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), or with silver (Ag) for reticular fibers. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured using a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-UV kinetic method (SRL, Tokyo, Japan). Hepatic collagen contents were evaluated by Sirius red staining of paraffin-embedded sections. Sirius red-positive areas were quantified in five nonoverlapping random fields (magnification 100×) on each slide using the imaging software ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
Isolation of Liver Nonparenchymal Mononuclear Cells.
Liver nonparenchymal mononuclear cells were isolated from the liver as previously described.26 Details are described in the Supporting Methods.
After blocking with anti-FcR (CD16/32, BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 20 minutes, cells were incubated with specific fluorescence-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) at 4°C for 30 minutes.27 Antimouse mAbs used are listed in Supporting Table 1. Irrelevant antirat isotype antibodies (BD Pharmingen) were used to assess background fluorescence. Cells for intracellular staining were pretreated with brefeldin A (10 μg/mL) and permeabilized. Stained cells were analyzed using FACS Canto II (Becton Dickinson, NJ), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
Dual-Color Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry.
Liver specimens were fixed with 10% formalin, paraffinized, and sectioned to 6 μm thickness, then deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was obtained by boiling in 10 nM citrate buffer solution. After blocking with 20% goat serum, sections were embedded with primary antibodies against CCR9 (Abcam, ab1662, Cambridge, UK) and alpha smooth-muscle actin (α-SMA) (DakoCytomation, clone 1A4, Carpinteria, CA) or CCR9 and F4/80 (eBioscience, clone BM8, San Diego, CA) overnight. Sections were then stained with secondary antibodies labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 568 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and nuclei counterstained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Immunohistochemistry was performed with mAb to α-SMA (DakoCytomation) using an M.O.M. kit (Vector Laboratories).9
Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) and Reverse Transcription.
Total RNA was extracted from liver homogenates or cultured cells using Trizol reagent (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY). Complementary DNA was synthesized from 100 ng of total RNA by reverse transcription. PCRs were performed using AmpliTaq Gold Fast PCR MasterMix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the predesigned primers listed in Supporting Table 2. To quantify the products, real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan Universal Master Mix and StepOne Plus systems (Applied Biosystems). The level of target gene expression was normalized to β-actin expression in each sample.
Isolation of Liver Sinusoid Endothelial Cells (LSEC).
LSECs were isolated as previously described.28 Details are described in the Supporting Methods.
HSC Coculture Experiments.
Isolation of HSCs and information regarding coculture or treatment are described in the Supporting Methods. The cells were cocultured for 24 hours and HSCs were harvested from a plate using 0.25% EDTA trypsin, after macrophages or other cocultured cells were washed away. Purity over 97% of HSCs was confirmed by flow cytometry. HSC RNA was isolated for qPCR as described above.
Cell-migration assays were performed using 8 μm-pore 96-well Transwell plates (Corning, Corning, NY). Serum-starved HSCs or isolated hepatic CD11b+ cells from WT or CCR9−/− mice were placed in the upper chamber and exposed to CCL25 (R&D Systems, no. O35903.1) at the indicated concentrations in the lower chamber. After 48 hours of incubation at 37°C, cells that migrated to the lower chamber were counted.
Data were analyzed using JMP9 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The Mann-Whitney U test, the unpaired Student t test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess the differences between groups, as appropriate. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Initiation of CCl4-Induced Liver Injury and Inflammatory Macrophage Infiltration Is CCR9-Dependent.
To elucidate how CCR9-expressing macrophages infiltrate and affect livers during the initiation of injury, a single IP administration of CCl4 to WT mice was used to induce acute liver injury. The number, frequency, and phenotype of infiltrating mononuclear cells were assessed by flow cytometry. The number of CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages increased significantly 24 hours after CCl4 administration compared with controls (Fig. 1A). Infiltrating CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages were positive for F4/80 and expressed Ly6Chi, a marker of inflammatory macrophages recruited to inflamed sites (Fig. 1B).29 Compared with CCR9-negative cells, CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages expressed higher levels of CD80 and CD86, and produced more TNF-α (Fig. 1B,C), suggesting an activated phenotype. Importantly, CCl4-treated CCR9−/− mice showed less periportal necrosis and less leukocyte infiltration, as well as significantly lower serum ALT levels (Fig. 1D). The level of TNF mRNA in the whole liver of CCl4-treated CCR9−/− mice was significantly lower than in WT mice (Fig. 1E). These results suggested a crucial role for CCR9 in the initiation of CCl4-induced liver injury.
CCR9 Critically Mediates Macrophage Accumulation During Liver Fibrogenesis.
Because accumulated CCR9+ macrophages are crucial for the initiation of CCl4-induced liver injury, they may also regulate intrahepatic processes in response to persistent liver injury, which leads to liver fibrosis. Therefore, we examined the role of CCR9+ macrophages in murine liver fibrosis models. Repetitive administration of CCl4 to WT mice three times per week for 6 weeks resulted in overt liver fibrosis (Fig. 2A) and a significant increase in CD11b+CCR9+ macrophage accumulation in fibrotic livers (Fig. 2B). Compared with CCR9-negative cells, the phenotypes of accumulated CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages resembled those that infiltrated livers with acute injury, which were F4/80+ and mostly Ly6Chi, with high expression levels of CD80, CD86 (Fig. 2C) and TNF-α (Fig. 2D). The levels of TNF mRNA of whole liver were significantly increased in fibrotic livers compared with controls (Fig. 2E). In the TAA/leptin liver fibrosis model, similar results were observed (Supporting Fig. 1A,B).
CCR9+ Macrophages and CCR9+ HSCs Colocalize During Liver Fibrosis.
Flow cytometry of cells from nonfibrotic livers showed CCR9 expression was detected mainly in a subset of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs, defined by Siglec H+), with some expression in CD11b+ macrophages or CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes. Little CCR9 expression was detected in CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes. In contrast to the significant increase of CCR9+ macrophages in persistent liver injury and liver fibrosis, pDCs and CD8+ T lymphocytes were relatively unchanged in frequency compared with controls (Fig. 2B; Supporting Fig. 2). Comparison of the ratio of increased mRNA expression from cell fractions including hepatic immune cells, HSCs, LSECs, and hepatocytes between CCl4- and olive oil-treated livers demonstrated a significant up-regulation in CCR9 mRNA only in macrophages and HSCs, and a significant up-regulation of CCL25 mRNA only in activated LSECs (Fig. 3A). Activation of LESCs was implicated by the simultaneous increase of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 mRNAs (Supporting Fig. 3). These results suggest that CCL25-expressing LSECs in livers, as suggested in previous study,22 might mediate the accumulation of CCR9+ macrophages, as well as HSCs during liver fibrosis, in persistent liver injury. We further analyzed fibrotic livers, caused by repetitive administration of CCl4, with dual-color immunofluorescence staining for CCR9 and F4/80, or CCR9 and α-SMA. This confirmed that CCR9+ HSCs colocalized with accumulated CCR9+ macrophages around periportal areas during liver fibrosis (Fig. 3B).
CCR9 Deficiency Attenuates Liver Fibrosis.
To further investigate the functional roles of CCR9+ macrophages in liver fibrogenesis, CCR9−/− and WT mice were repetitively administered CCl4. Less periportal fibrosis and leukocytic infiltration in the liver of CCR9−/− mice was observed by H&E staining (Fig. 4A). Markedly attenuated liver fibrosis in CCR9−/− mice was demonstrated by α-SMA immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 4B), and quantitative analyses of Sirius red staining (Fig. 4C). CCR9 deficiency also resulted in significantly reduced mRNA expression of fibrosis markers including α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen 1α1, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) (Fig. 4D). In the TAA/leptin liver fibrosis model, similar results were observed (Supporting Fig. 1C).
Because of the protective role of CCR9 deficiency in murine models of liver fibrosis, we hypothesized that CCR9 was critical for controlling immune cell infiltration into the liver upon chronic liver injury and fibrosis. First, we noticed that the frequency of infiltrating CD11b+ macrophages significantly decreased in CCR9−/− livers compared with WT livers following repetitive CCl4 injection (Fig. 5A). Isolated CD11b+ macrophages from WT mice showed significantly higher TNF, NO synthase (NOS)-2, and TGF-β1 mRNA expression compared with CCR9−/− mice (Fig. 5B). This indicated that accumulating CCR9+ macrophages in chronic liver injury had both proinflammatory and profibrogenic phenotypes. Macrophages from WT fibrotic livers also showed significant concentration-dependent chemotaxis to CCL25 compared with CCR9−/− macrophages (Fig. 5C). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the frequency and phenotype of intrahepatic pDCs between WT and CCR9−/− mice under chronic CCl4 administration (Fig. 5D,E). Notably, the frequency of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but not CD4+ helper T lymphocytes, was statistically lower in chronically injured CCR9−/− livers than in WT livers (Fig. 5E). This phenomenon might be due to the observation that some CD8+ T lymphocytes, but not CD4+ T lymphocytes, expressed CCR9 in nonfibrotic livers, as described above. The level of IFN-γ mRNA was not significantly different between WT and CCR9−/− mice with persistent liver injury (Supporting Fig. 4). The levels of T-bx21 and GATA-3 mRNA, representative of Th1 and Th2 transcription factors, respectively, were significantly increased in fibrotic livers from WT mice compared with CCR9−/− mice (Fig. 5F), suggesting that CCR9 might play roles in the maintenance of both Th1-related inflammation and Th2-related fibrogenesis.
CCL25 Mediates Migration of HSCs.
As the up-regulation of CCR9 mRNA in HSCs and the existence of CCR9+ HSCs were confirmed in fibrotic livers (Fig. 3), this suggested that HSCs might be affected by the CCL25/CCR9 axis. By flow cytometry, significantly increased CCR9 expression was noticed in HSCs from fibrotic livers (Fig. 6A). Importantly, CCR9-expressing HSCs isolated from CCl4-treated WT mice had activated and profibrogenic phenotypes, as shown by the increase of α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen 1α1, and TIMP-1 mRNA expression (Fig. 6B). A transwell migration assay demonstrated that WT HSCs had significant potential to migrate along CCL25 gradients compared with HSCs from CCR9−/− mice (Fig. 6C). After 48 hours of culture with 300 ng/mL CCL25, fibrosis marker mRNAs increased in HSCs from WT mice compared with HSCs from CCR9−/− mice (Fig. 6D), but to a lesser extent compared with activated HSCs in vivo (Fig. 6B).
CCR9+ Macrophages Are Crucial for Activating HSCs and Inducing Hepatic Collagen Deposition.
Accordingly, accumulation of CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages might be influential upon chronic liver injury and subsequent hepatic fibrosis. To examine the interactions of HSCs that produce the majority of collagen leading to liver fibrosis,3 hepatic CD11b+ macrophages were isolated from CCl4-injected WT or CCR9−/− mice and cocultured with quiescent HSCs isolated from WT mice. The mRNA levels of fibrosis markers, including α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen 1α1, and TIMP-1, were significantly higher in HSCs cocultured with CD11b+ macrophages from WT mice compared with those with CD11b+ macrophages from CCR9−/− mice (Fig. 7A). TNF-α is a key factor of HSC activation.3, 25 Addition of anti-TNF-α antibodies significantly decreased the levels of fibrosis marker mRNAs in HSCs from each group. Furthermore, the neutralization of TGF-β1 caused decreased levels of fibrosis marker mRNAs in HSCs as well. This suggested both TNF-α and TGF-β released from CCR9+ macrophages are important for HSCs activation. We also confirmed that fibrosis marker mRNAs in HSCs were not affected by CD8+ T lymphocytes or other non-CD11b immune cells (Fig. 7A). To confirm the significance of TNF-α-mediated HSC activation by CD11b+CCR9+ macrophages, quiescent HSCs isolated from mice deficient for TNF receptor super family 1a (TNFRsf1a−/−) were cocultured with WT CD11b+ macrophages from fibrotic livers, or cultured with TNF-α at 500 pg/mL, as TNF-α is known to activate HSCs through TNF receptor 1.30 The addition of TNF-α did not activate TNFRsf1a−/− HSCs, and the degree of HSC activation evaluated by α-SMA and collagen 1α1 mRNA expression when cocultured with WT CD11b+ macrophages was significantly diminished, while that evaluated by TGF-β1 and TIMP-1 mRNA expression was only slightly elevated (Fig. 7B).
Immune cells, including macrophages, play a critical role in the initiation of liver injury and subsequent liver fibrosis. Our previous work demonstrated that TNF-α-producing CCR9+ macrophages initiate acute liver inflammation through interactions with Th1 cells.23 The present study suggests a novel role for the CCR9/CCL25 axis in the process leading to persistent liver injury and subsequent liver fibrosis, as summarized in Fig. 7C.
Deficiency in CCR9 protected the liver from overt fibrosis in two different murine models, as well as causing decreased infiltration of macrophages into the liver. The crucial role of recruited macrophages has been emphasized previously in several experimental models.3 Various chemokines are involved at different stages of inflammation and are highly tissue-specific.14, 29, 31 In murine models of liver fibrosis, the essential roles of CCR2-dependent monocytes have been reported, and are similar to the monocytes recruited to livers with acute injury,9 while CCR5-dependent fibrogenesis is prominent in the later process of fibrosis.10 A possible role for the CCR9/CCL25 axis in the pathogenesis of experimental atherosclerosis, a chronic inflammatory state, was recently reported.32 CCR9+ macrophages in the synovial fluid may also play a role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease.33 These findings suggest a possible immunological role for CCR9+ macrophages in chronic inflammation in various tissues. The present study is the first to demonstrate that CCR9+ macrophages affect chronic inflammation and subsequent fibrosis in the liver.
It is important to clarify the relevance of the CCR9/CCL25 axis during the development of liver fibrosis in our model. First, we carefully evaluated the source of CCR9-positive cells by isolating each cell fraction in fibrotic livers and found that CCR9 expression was up-regulated only in macrophages and HSCs, together with the up-regulation of CCL25 in LSECs. Regarding the cellular location of CCR9, dual-color immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated the colocalization of CCR9 on macrophages and HSCs around periportal areas where profound matrix deposition occurs in various liver fibrosis models.
Several observations support our hypothesis that CCR9+ macrophages are key factors in processing wound healing and subsequent liver fibrosis. First, numbers of CCR9+CD11b+ macrophages with an activated phenotype and high TNF-α production dramatically increased in experimental fibrotic livers. Second, CCR9 deficiency resulted in reduced infiltration of CD11b+ macrophages to the liver and subsequent attenuation of fibrosis. Third, and most important, in vitro coculture analysis revealed that CD11b+ macrophages from CCl4-treated WT mice (i.e., the existence of CCR9+ macrophages), but not CD11b+ macrophages from CCl4-treated CCR9−/− mice (CCR9− macrophages) have the potential to activate HSCs by up-regulating α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen 1α1, and TIMP-1 mRNA.
Molecular interactions between macrophages and HSCs are important for promoting fibrosis. We demonstrated that TNF-α produced by CCR9+ macrophages was a critical activator of HSCs in the process of liver fibrosis, by showing that (1) TNF-α neutralization significantly diminished HSC activation induced by CCR9+ macrophages (Fig. 7A), and (2) HSCs deficient in TNF receptor 1 were only slightly activated by CCR9+ macrophages (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, accumulating CCR9+ macrophages also showed increased levels of TGF-β1 and NOS-2 mRNA (Fig. 5B). TGF-β1 antagonism significantly decreased HSCs activation induced by CCR9+ macrophages (Fig. 7A). These results suggest that TGF-β1 or ROS produced by CCR9+ macrophages may act in concert with TNF-α to activate HSCs and cause subsequent liver fibrosis.
Alternatively, it is possible that CCR9/CCL25 directly targets HSCs to promote activation and subsequent liver fibrosis. We demonstrated that in fibrotic livers, CCR9 expression increased in HSCs, and CCL25 had the potential to attract HSCs by in vitro transwell assay (Fig. 6A-C). Furthermore, CCL25 could up-regulate α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen 1α1, and TIMP-1 mRNA in HSCs in vitro, although to a lesser extent than in vivo (Fig. 6B) and in coculture experiments with the existence of CCR9+ macrophages (Fig. 7A), indicating that CCL25 might play a more profound role in attracting HSCs to injured livers rather than directly activating HSCs. Although these results support our hypothesis that the CCR9/CCL25 axis contributes to liver fibrosis by (1) directly targeting HSCs in the injured liver, and (2) recruiting CCR9+ macrophages and indirectly activating HSCs, the profound decrease of fibrosis observed due to CCR9 deficiency in vivo (Fig.4) and the superiority of HSC activation with CCR9+ macrophages compared with CCL25 in vitro (Fig. 6D, 7A) may suggest a more prevailing potential of CCR9+ macrophages to activate HSCs leading to fibrosis, compared with the direct effect of CCL25.
We also investigated the possibility that other immune cells might be involved in the process of liver fibrosis, since CCR9 expression was also detected in Siglec H+ pDCs and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes. It is worth noting that decreased numbers of CD8+ T lymphocytes were observed in the livers of CCl4-treated CCR9−/− mice compared with WT mice. A previous study showed that CD4+ T lymphocytes down-regulate CCR9 expression upon leaving the thymus, while CD8+ T lymphocytes retain CCR9 expression.34 We confirmed this by showing that only CD8+ T lymphocytes expressed CCR9 in nonfibrotic murine livers (Supporting Fig. 2). Thus, the decrease in CD8+ T lymphocytes in CCR9−/− mice may be the result of redistribution due to loss of CCR9. According to previous studies, the role of CD8+ T lymphocytes in liver fibrogenesis is still controversial.35-37 Here, we demonstrated that the activation of HSCs was not induced by isolated hepatic CD8+ lymphocytes in vitro (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the level of intrahepatic IFN-γ mRNA, a representative effector cytokine of CD8+ T lymphocytes, between CCl4-treated WT and CCR9−/− mice (Supporting Fig. 4). Taken together, CCR9+ macrophages appeared to have a greater role in chronic liver injury and liver fibrosis than CCR9+CD8+ T lymphocytes.
With regard to the involvement of pDCs, we demonstrated that the number and the phenotype of hepatic pDCs did not differ between WT and CCR9−/− mice under experimental fibrosis in this study (Fig. 5D,E). A previous study showed that CD11c+ TNF-α-producing DCs were pathogenic and activated HSCs in murine liver fibrosis models.25 TGF-β can negatively regulate pDCs in the spleen or intestinal mucosa.38, 39 However, it is still not completely understood how pDCs interact with HSCs. Limitations of experimental models of liver fibrosis may be a reason for these discrepancies.
HSCs are abundant cellular reservoirs of retinoids.5 Retinoic acid up-regulates CCR9 and α4β7 expression on T lymphocytes and mediates their gut-homing ability.40 Although HSCs have been suggested to participate in this process,41 quiescent HSCs failed to show superiority in stimulating CCR9 expression on naïve T lymphocytes in vitro compared with intestinal DCs.42 In the current study, we also confirmed that addition of retinoic acid up-regulated CCR9 expression in intrahepatic CD11b+ macrophages from WT mice in vitro (data not shown). Taken together, this suggests that interactions between macrophages and HSCs by way of retinoic acid may indicate a highly privileged environment for CCR9 in the promotion of liver fibrosis.
Collectively, we demonstrated the prominent and specific expression of CCR9 in liver macrophages and their involvement in the process of fibrosis by interacting with HSCs in chronically injured livers. Neutralization of CCR9 has been proposed as a novel therapeutic strategy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.43 Thus, based on our murine model results and subject to future verification in human samples, CCR9 antagonism may represent a promising novel therapeutic target for liver fibrosis.
We thank Dr. Paul E. Love (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) for providing CCR9−/− mice, and Dr. Toshiaki Teratani and Dr. Takahiro Suzuki (Keio University School of Medicine) for technical assistance.