SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
hep26455-sup-0001-suppfig1.pptx1008KSupporting Figure 1: Regression plots (slope and intercept) between MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF at baseline and week 24: Scatterplots of MRI versus MRS. Redline represents the best fit through the data points and the great line represent the null hypotheses (intercept=0, slope =1) . The regression intercept and slope and their 95% confidence intervals are shown. * is significance from intercept 0 or slope 1 according to two tail t test α=0.05. At baseline MRI underestimated MRS by 3% with small bias in the slope. At week 24 MRI underestimated MRS by 1% with a small bias as well. The difference in the slope and intercept is relatively small 3% and 1% and likely clinically irrelevant

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.