Biosafety Research Institute and Laboratory of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine (BK21 Plus Program), Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea
Address reprint requests to: Bumseok Kim, D.V.M., Ph.D., Laboratory of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, 561-756, South Korea. E-mail: email@example.com; fax: 82-63-270-3780.
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009-0064313), (2010-0003644), by the Brain Korea 21 Plus Program in 2013, Republic of Korea, and NIH/NIDDK R01DK085252 and NIH/NIEHS P42ES010337 (to Ekihiro Seki).
Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) signaling predominantly regulates production of type I interferons (IFNs), which has been suggested in clinical studies to be antifibrotic. However, the mechanistic role of the TLR7-type I IFN axis in liver fibrosis has not been elucidated. In the present study, liver fibrosis was induced in wild-type (WT), TLR7-deficient, and IFN-α/β receptor-1 (IFNAR1)-deficient mice and TLR7-mediated signaling was assessed in liver cells isolated from these mice. TLR7-deficient and IFNAR1-deficient mice were more susceptible to liver fibrosis than WT mice, indicating that TLR7-type I IFN signaling exerts a protective effect against liver fibrosis. Notably, the hepatic expression of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) was suppressed in TLR7- or IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with respective WT mice, and treatment with recombinant IL-1ra reduced liver fibrosis. In vivo activation of TLR7 significantly increased IFNa4 and IL-1ra expression in the liver. Interestingly, each cytokine had a different cellular source, showing that dendritic cells (DCs) are the responsible cell type for production of type I IFN, while Kupffer cells (KCs) mainly produce IL-1ra in response to type I IFN. Furthermore, TLR7 activation by R848 injection suppressed liver fibrosis and production of proinflammatory cytokines, and these effects were dependent on type I IFN signaling. Consistent with in vivo data, IFN-α significantly induced IL-1ra production in primary KCs. Conclusion: TLR7 signaling activates DCs to produce type I IFN, which in turn induces antifibrogenic IL-1ra production in KCs. Thus, manipulation of the TLR7-type I IFN-IL-1ra axis may be a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of liver fibrosis. (Hepatology 2014;60:237–249)
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Liver fibrosis is a sequel of a chronic wound-healing response to a continuous hepatocellular insult. Such injuries induce an inflammatory response and activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in the liver, leading to excessive production of extracellular matrix proteins. Liver cirrhosis, the endstage of liver fibrosis, is associated with development of complications such as ascites, renal failure, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, and portal hypertension, and may progress to hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, investigation of liver fibrosis is the first step in understanding a number of life-threatening complications in chronic liver disease.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in sensing and eliminating foreign antigens. Interaction of TLRs with their specific ligands leads to the production of various cytokines necessary for innate or adaptive immune responses. TLR7 is generally considered to recognize single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) derived from viruses and bacteria.[4, 5] However, host-derived denatured RNA from apoptotic cells is also reported to be an endogenous ligand of TLR7.6,7 Several lines of evidence suggest that intestinal bacterial overgrowth and increased bacterial translocation are associated with liver fibrosis. Upon liver injury, levels of bacterial products increase in the portal or systemic circulation.[8, 9] Thus, liver cells might be exposed to effective levels of TLR7 ligands during the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. Although the critical roles of TLR4 and TLR9 signaling in liver fibrosis have been demonstrated,[10, 11] the role of TLR7 in the development of liver fibrosis has not been studied.
TLR7 signaling predominantly induces type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β) in an interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7)-dependent manner. Interestingly, it has been suggested that type I IFNs participate in suppression of liver diseases.[13-16] It has been noted that type I IFNs directly suppress progressive fibrosis and prevent the subsequent occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C who do not respond to treatment with type I IFN.[17, 18] Therapy with IFN-α has been reported to ameliorate fibrosis in histopathological analysis of biopsy specimens and reduce the serum levels of fibrotic markers, such as the N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III. Furthermore, type I IFN directly inhibits several profibrogenic factors (Col1α1, Timp1, and Tgfb1) that promote liver fibrosis in concanavalin-induced liver fibrosis. Some reports have suggested that IFN-α also possesses antifibrogenic properties in cultured fibroblasts or human chondrocytes.[21, 22] Recently, it has been demonstrated that treatment of activated rat HSCs and rat T6 cells with CL075, a TLR7 and TLR8 ligand, significantly inhibits cell proliferation and migration. Although multiple studies evaluating the role of type I IFN or TLR7 have been shown in vitro, it is unclear what mechanism exerts this function by TLR7 signaling in vivo.
The present study examined the in vivo role of TLR7 by assessing liver fibrosis induced by bile duct ligation (BDL) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) injection in wild-type (WT) mice and mice deficient in TLR7 or type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1). Our results demonstrated that TLR7 signaling protects liver fibrosis by up-regulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) through type I IFNs.
Materials and Methods
TLR7-deficient and IFNAR1-deficient mice (8-10 weeks of age, 25-30 g body weight) were used in these studies. Dr. Akira (Osaka University, Suita, Japan) kindly provided the TLR7-deficient mice (on a BALB/c and C57BL/6 background). IFNAR1-deficient mice (on C57BL/6 background) were purchased from B&K Universal (Hull, UK) and backcrossed on C57BL/6 mice for at least 10 generations. CD11c-DTR transgenic mice (on a C57BL/6 background) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. The mice received humane care according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health recommendations outlined in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.” Experimental procedures and animal management procedures were undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Animal Care and Ethics Committees of Chonbuk National University. The animal facility of the Chonbuk National University is fully accredited by the National Association of Laboratory Animal Care.
Liver Fibrosis Model
This study was performed using two different murine fibrosis models. In the first model, BDL was performed in genetically modified mice and corresponding control WT mice (n = 12 mice per group) as previously described. In the second model, CCl4 (Sigma-Aldrich; 10% in corn oil) or vehicle (corn oil) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a dose of 2 mL/kg body weight three times per week for up to 12 weeks.
Other Materials and Methods
Other materials used in this study and methods for isolation of liver cell fractions, in vivo depletion of dendritic cells and Kupffer cells, hepatic cytokine measurement, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and assessment of hydroxyproline contents are described in the Supporting Materials and Methods.
All data were expressed as the mean ± standard error. Differences between multiple groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS v. 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) was used for individual comparisons. Differences between two groups were compared using a two-tailed Student t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
TLR7-Deficient Mice Are Susceptible to Chronic Liver Fibrosis
To investigate the importance of TLR7 in liver fibrosis, WT and TLR7-deficient mice were subjected to BDL or CCl4 injection. At 21 days after BDL, TLR7-deficient mice displayed significantly increased liver fibrosis compared with WT mice as determined by quantification of Sirius red- and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive areas and measurement of hydroxyproline content (Fig. 1A-D). The exacerbation of liver fibrosis was also confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic expression of fibrogenic genes (Fig. 1E). The messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of Col1a1, Acta2, Timp1, and Tgfb1 were significantly elevated in TLR7-deficient mice compared with WT mice. Furthermore, inflammatory responses of TLR7-deficient mice were significantly higher than those of WT mice, as demonstrated by hepatic protein expression of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-12p70 (Fig. 1F).
Similar to the BDL model, CCl4 treatment for 12 weeks resulted in aggravated fibrosis in TLR7-deficient mice compared with WT mice as assessed by quantification of Sirius red- and α-SMA-positive areas and hydroxyproline content (Fig. 2A-D). In accordance with the extent of fibrosis, mRNA expression of Col1a1, Acta2, Timp1, and Tgfb1 mRNA was significantly higher in TLR7-deficient mice than in WT mice (Fig. 2E) and hepatic inflammation was significantly increased in TLR7-deficient mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 2F). These data indicate that loss of TLR7 exacerbates liver fibrosis in two different models of chronic liver injury and suggest that TLR7 signaling plays a protective role during the course of chronic liver fibrosis.
Given that there are strain-specific differences of T helper cytokine responses in liver fibrosis, we sought to examine whether TLR7-mediated signaling is affected by mouse strain. To rule out the confounding effect of genetic background in our study, we performed the same set of BDL experiments on C57BL/6 background TLR7-KO versus respective WT mice. As shown in Supporting Fig. 1, fibrosis results from C57BL/6 background showed a similar pattern as those from Balb/C background, suggesting that a protective role of TLR7 in liver fibrosis is highly preserved, at least between these two different strains of mice.
TLR7 Deficiency Reduces Induction of Type I IFN Signaling in Dendritic Cells (DCs)
To investigate the cellular source of TLR7 in the liver, we isolated various cell populations (DCs, Kupffer cells [KCs], hepatic stellate cells [HSCs], and hepatocytes [HPs]) from WT normal livers. Quantification of Tlr7 mRNA expression in each cell population indicated that DCs and KCs are the primary source of TLR7 in the liver (Fig. 3A). Since the TLR7-mediated signaling pathway is predominantly responsible for type I IFN production[26, 27] and these cytokines are mainly produced by macrophages and DCs,[5, 28] the cell types required for induction of TLR7-type I IFN axis, we focused on macrophages and DCs in the liver. To elucidate the responsible cell type for production of type I IFN upon TLR7 activation, we administered R848 to CD11c-DTR transgenic mice after depletion of DCs by diphtheria toxin injection or to WT mice after depletion of KCs by clodronate liposome injection. As shown in Fig. 3B, R848 injection significantly increased IFNa4 expression in the liver. Notably, this induction was completely abrogated in DC-depleted mice, but not in KC-depleted mice. Because the BDL model induces more prominent phenotypes than the CCl4 model, we predominantly focused on the BDL model in subsequent analyses of liver injury. To further investigate the role of TLR7 and type I IFN in DCs of BDL liver, DCs were isolated from BDL liver of WT or TLR7 KO mice and the levels of type I IFN related genes were measured. Consistent with ex vivo results, mRNA levels of IFN-a4 and Pin1, a signal molecule that activates IRF7 and type I IFN signaling, were significantly decreased in DCs of TLR7-deficient mice compared with those of WT mice (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, hepatic protein levels of IFN-α and Pin1 were significantly lower in TLR7-deficient mice than in WT mice (Fig. 3D). These results indicate that TLR7 deficiency decreases type I IFN signaling in fibrotic DCs.
Decreased Type I IFNs Contribute to the Exacerbation of BDL-Induced Fibrosis in TLR7-Deficient Mice
The effects of TLR7 are transduced by two cascades, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and IRF7 pathways, which induce production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs, respectively.[3, 30] To differentiate between these two arms of TLR7 signaling in liver fibrosis, we examined liver fibrosis in WT and IFNAR1-deficient mice after 21 days of BDL. We hypothesized that decreased type I IFN signaling is responsible for the exacerbation of liver fibrosis in TLR7-deficient mice. Similar to our findings in TLR7-deficient mice, IFNAR1-deficient mice were more susceptible to BDL-induced fibrosis than WT mice, as demonstrated by an increase in Sirius red- and α-SMA-positive area and hydroxyproline content in IFNAR1-deficient mice (Fig. 4A-D). These results were further supported by qRT-PCR data showing a significantly higher induction of mRNA expression of Col1a1, Acta2, and Timp1 (but not Tgfb1) in IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 4E). Additionally, liver inflammatory responses were significantly increased in IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with WT mice, as demonstrated by hepatic protein expression of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12p70 (Fig. 4F). These data indicate that type I IFN signaling prevents the liver fibrosis that is triggered by BDL. These findings, together with our earlier results (Figs. 1- 3), suggest that the exacerbated liver fibrosis in TLR7-deficient mice is mediated by the loss of protective type I IFN signaling.
TLR7 Activates DCs to Produce Type I IFN, Which in Turn Induces IL-1ra Production in KCs
The protective effect of TLR7-mediated type I IFN signaling against liver fibrosis implied the involvement of type I IFN-dependent antiinflammatory factors. We therefore explored the expression of another IFN-inducible molecule, IL-1ra, an endogenous antagonist for IL-1β. Hepatic IL-1ra protein levels in the fibrotic liver were significantly decreased in both TLR7- and IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with WT (Fig. 5A). To clarify the responsible cell type for production of IL-1ra upon TLR7 activation, R848 was administered to CD11c-DTR transgenic mice after either depletion of DCs or KC. As shown in Fig. 5B, TLR7 activation by R848 significantly increased IL-1ra expression in the liver. Of note, such induction was decreased 50% in KC-depleted mice, but not changed in DC-depleted mice. Furthermore, IL-1ra expression was significantly reduced in KCs of BDL TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with those of WT mice (Fig. 5C,D). These results prompted us to test whether KCs can be stimulated by type I IFN, thereby producing IL-1ra in a paracrine manner. Indeed, the treatment of mouse recombinant IFN-α significantly induced IL-1ra production in primary KCs (Fig. 5E). Collectively, our results suggest that TLR7 signaling activates DCs to produce type I IFN, which in turn induces IL-1ra production in KCs.
Restoration of IL-1ra Ameliorated BDL-Induced Liver Fibrosis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-Deficient Mice
To test the therapeutic potential of IL-1ra in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis, we treated BDL TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice with recombinant IL-1ra (Anakinra). Consistent with the results in Figs. 1 and 4, BDL-induced fibrosis was exacerbated in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice compared with each WT mice. Notably, treatment with Anakinra restored the fibrosis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice to levels comparable to those of WT mice (Fig. 6A-E; Supporting Fig. 4). Amelioration of liver fibrosis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice was verified by quantification of fibrogenic genes expression with the exception of Tgfb1 (Fig. 6C,F). These results suggest that TLR7-dependent IL-1ra is responsible for protection against BDL-induced liver fibrosis.
TLR7-Induced Protection of Liver Fibrosis Through IL-1ra Is Dependent on Type I IFN Signaling
We next treated BDL WT mice with R848, a selective ligand for TLR7, to investigate whether TLR7 activation prevents liver fibrosis. As shown in Fig. 7, treatment with R848 ameliorated BDL-induced liver fibrosis compared with vehicle-treated animals, as demonstrated by decreased histopathology (Sirius-red and α-SMA) and hydroxyproline content (Fig. 7A-C). In accordance with the histological findings, treatment with R848 significantly decreased the expression of fibrogenic genes (Fig. 7D) and resulted in induction of IL-1ra protein in the liver of WT mice (Fig. 7E).
Finally, we investigated whether TLR7-mediated amelioration of liver fibrosis is dependent on type I IFN signaling using mice deficient in IFNAR1. In contrast to WT mice, treatment with TLR7 ligand did not inhibit the progression of BDL-induced liver fibrosis in IFNR-deficient mice (Fig. 7A-D). In addition, hepatic production of IL-1ra was not increased by R848 treatment in IFNAR1-deficient mice (Fig. 7E). To further explore the functional importance of type I IFN signaling in IL-1ra production, we treated isolated KCs from WT and IFNAR1-deficient mice with conditioned media from R848- or vehicle-treated WT hepatic nonparenchymal cells (WT-NPCs). Conditioned media from R848-treated WT-NPCs increased expression of the IL-1ra gene in WT KCs and this effect was dampened in IFNAR1-deficient KCs (Fig. 7F), which is consistent with data showing type I IFN signaling-dependent antiinflammatory effect of R848 in vivo (Supporting Fig. 5). These findings support the notion that the TLR7-mediated antifibrotic activity by way of production of IL-1ra is dependent on type I IFN signaling.
TLR7 signaling induces production of type I IFNs through IRF7 and activation of Pin1.12,29 Accumulating evidence suggests that type I IFNs have a protective function against liver fibrosis[13-16, 20] and that TLR7 agonist-induced activation inhibits HSC activation. However, the mechanistic role of TLR7 signaling in liver fibrosis has not been fully studied. The present study demonstrated that TLR7-deficient mice have greater liver fibrosis than WT mice after BDL or CCl4 treatment. Furthermore, our data demonstrated that type I IFN-dependent IL-1ra is pivotal in the protection against liver fibrosis, based on experiments using IFNAR1- or TLR7-deficient mice. Consequently, we concluded that TLR7-type I IFN signaling inhibits liver fibrosis through induction of IL-1ra.
Several lines of evidence support a mechanism in which inhibition of type I IFN-dependent IL-1ra enhances liver fibrosis in BDL and CCl4-treated TLR7-deficient mice. First, the hepatoprotective role of the type I IFN-dependent IL-1ra axis and the therapeutic potential of IL-1ra have been well documented in various hepatic injury models.[15, 33, 34] Second, hepatic production of IFN-α and IL-1ra and expression of hepatic Pin1, a key player in the activation of the IRF7-type I IFN axis, are significantly lower in TLR7-deficient mice than in WT mice. Third, similar to TLR7-deficiency, inactivation of type I IFN signaling exacerbated liver fibrosis and blocked IL-1ra production, and decreased IL-1ra expression aggravated liver fibrosis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice. Fourth, DCs are responsible cell type for production of type I IFN upon TLR7 activation, while KCs mainly produce IL-1ra in response to type I IFN. Finally, TLR7 activation with R848 ameliorated liver fibrosis in vivo and activated DCs to produce type I IFN, which subsequently induced IL-1ra production in KCs in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest that TLR7 activation-mediated type I IFNs and IL-1ra production is responsible for the antifibrotic effect.
For clarification of events downstream of TLR7, we additionally studied IFNAR1-deficient mice. Similar to TLR7-deficient mice, IFNAR1-deficient mice showed aggravated liver fibrosis compared with WT mice, suggesting that type I IFN signaling, a common denominator in signaling between TLR7 and IFNAR1 deficiency, has a protective role against liver fibrosis. In response to liver injury caused by BDL or CCl4 treatment, increased production of IL-1ra was evident in the fibrotic liver of WT mice (Supporting Fig. 3), whereas TLR7-deficient and IFNAR1-deficient mice showed lower induction of IL-1ra. Therefore, we speculate that BDL- or CCl4-induced IL-1ra production is partially mediated by type I IFNs and TLR7. This notion is consistent with a previous report and our data showing significantly decreased IL-1ra production in TLR7-deficient mice compared with those of WT mice. Moreover, treatment with IL-1ra ameliorated the exacerbated liver fibrosis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice. Accordingly, these findings suggest that dysregulation of IL-1ra is responsible for exacerbated liver fibrogenesis in TLR7 or IFNAR1-deficient mice.
To elucidate the cellular source of type I IFN and IL-1ra upon TLR7 activation, we depleted DCs and KCs by diphtheria toxin injection in CD11c-DTR mice and clodronate injection in WT mice, respectively. In vivo activation of TLR7 by R848 injection significantly increased the expression of type I IFN and IL-1ra in liver. DC depletion completely inhibited type I IFN production and KC depletion significantly decreased 50% of IL-1ra expression in liver. These results suggest that type I IFN-producing cells are predominantly DCs, while IL-1ra is mainly produced by KCs in response to type I IFN.
A previous report demonstrated an antifibrotic effect of TLR7 ligand in primary activated HSCs (14 days after isolation) and the T6 cell line. However, it may not have reflected the real fibrogenic responses of TLR7 on HSCs because fully activated HSCs were used in their study. We investigated the effect of TLR7 ligand on primary quiescent (day 1 postisolation), intermediate (day 3), and activated (day 7) HSCs. Consequently, we found that TLR7 ligand has no effects on fibrogenic responses of quiescent, intermediate, and activated HSCs (Supporting Fig. 2). Notably, R848 significantly suppressed expression of antiapoptotic molecules (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1) in intermediate HSCs (day 3), suggesting that TLR7 activation in HSC mediates survival mechanism. These results corroborate the previous report showing TLR7 ligand-induced inhibition of proliferation and migration of HSCs.
We further showed that administration of the TLR7 ligand R848 significantly ameliorated BDL-induced liver fibrosis. Moreover, R848 treatment induced the expression of hepatic IL-1ra in vivo and in vitro. Interestingly, these effects were dampened in IFNAR1-deficient liver and KCs. This finding was consistent with previous studies demonstrating type I IFN-dependent induction of IL-1ra in liver injury. Originally, we questioned whether R848 treatment induces proinflammatory cytokines in IFNAR1-deficient mice. But significant changes were not found between groups. Of note, we found R848 treatment suppresses BDL-induced liver inflammation in WT mice, but not in IFNAR1-deficient mice, suggesting that R848-induced type I IFN may exert antiinflammatory effects in liver fibrosis (Supporting Fig. 5). Several reports demonstrated that type I IFN inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-12, and Th1 and Th17 type cytokines.[35-39] Furthermore, type I IFN directly suppresses IL-1β production and inflammasome activation by way of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and STAT1.35 In addition to previous reports, our data suggest that TLR7-induced IL-1ra for the prevention of liver fibrosis is dependent on type I IFN signaling. Also, we concluded that our treatment condition of R848 does not induce the additional increment of proinflammatory responses in excess of surgery (BDL)-induced inflammation.
TLR7 signaling activates two bifurcating pathways through the adapter protein MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88). The first cascade leads to the activation of proinflammatory cytokines and requires NF-κB, which is achieved by early endosomal activation (VAMP3+). The second cascade leads to the activation of type I IFN genes through phosphorylation of IRF7, which is achieved by late endosomal activation (LAMP2+). A recent study showed that AP3-deficient DCs fail to produce type I IFNs despite normal to moderately enhanced NF-κB-dependent cytokine production. In our study, mice deficient for TLR7 signaling showed significantly decreased AP3 expression and a lower LAMP2/VAMP3 ratio in the liver and specifically in DCs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that late endosomal activation is required for type I IFN production in response to R848 (Supporting Fig. 6). Taken together, these findings suggest that the enhanced liver fibrosis in TLR7-deficient mice is mediated by suppression of bifurcation toward type I IFN signaling through inhibition of AP3 and LAMP2, and this notion is being further investigated.
In summary, TLR7 signaling activates DCs to induce type I IFN signaling, which triggers the production of IL-1ra in KCs. This pathway plays a pivotal role in endogenous protection against liver fibrosis. Furthermore, we clarified that DCs are a major source of TLR7-induced type I IFN production, and KCs mainly produce IL-1ra in response to type I IFN in a paracrine manner. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that stimulation of TLR7 protects against chronic liver injury by antiinflammatory type I IFN-dependent induction of IL-1ra. Understanding of TLR7-type I IFN protective mechanisms will offer valuable insights for the prevention and treatment of fibrosis.