Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Development of hepatitis C virus genotype 3a cell culture system
Article first published online: 14 JUL 2014
© 2014 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Volume 60, Issue 6, pages 1838–1850, December 2014
How to Cite
Kim, S., Date, T., Yokokawa, H., Kono, T., Aizaki, H., Maurel, P., Gondeau, C. and Wakita, T. (2014), Development of hepatitis C virus genotype 3a cell culture system. Hepatology, 60: 1838–1850. doi: 10.1002/hep.27197
Supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and from the Research on Health Sciences Focusing on Drug Innovation from the Japan Health Sciences Foundation.
See Editorial on Page 1806
- Issue published online: 24 NOV 2014
- Article first published online: 14 JUL 2014
- Accepted manuscript online: 3 MAY 2014 04:18AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 APR 2014
- Manuscript Received: 28 NOV 2013
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3a infection poses a serious health problem worldwide. A significant association has been reported between HCV genotype 3a infections and hepatic steatosis. Nevertheless, virological characterization of genotype 3a HCV is delayed due to the lack of appropriate virus cell culture systems. In the present study, we established the first infectious genotype 3a HCV system by introducing adaptive mutations into the S310 strain. HCV core proteins had different locations in JFH-1 and S310 virus-infected cells. Furthermore, the lipid content in S310 virus-infected cells was higher than Huh7.5.1 cells and JFH-1 virus-infected cells as determined by the lipid droplet staining area. Conclusion: This genotype 3a infectious cell culture system may be a useful experimental model for studying genotype 3a viral life cycles, molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis, and genotype 3a-specific antiviral drug development. (Hepatology 2014;60:1837–1849)