This article was published online on 14 May 2013. Error was subsequently identified in the Abstract section. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected 24 May 2013.
The long and bumpy road to outcome-oriented management of long-term care in Germany: implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument in home-care services†
Article first published online: 14 MAY 2013
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Volume 29, Issue 3, pages 316–329, July/September 2014
How to Cite
2014), The long and bumpy road to outcome-oriented management of long-term care in Germany: implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument in home-care services, Int J Health Plann Mgmt, 29, 316–329. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2186, , and (
- Issue published online: 4 AUG 2014
- Article first published online: 14 MAY 2013
- long-term care;
- assessment instrument
Although the quality of long-term care has improved, many problems still remain, and better processes seem to be necessary. Hence, outcome-oriented management is of particular importance. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) is a tool that has been used successfully in many countries to improve quality of care. However, there are problems of implementation and it lacks information on the conditions of successful or failing information of the RAI. The aim of this article is to find out to what extent technical/qualification requirements help to introduce or lead to failure of the implementation of an assessment instrument like RAI.
Therefore, a cluster randomized controlled trial showed services using RAI intensively tend to have better outcomes after 12 months. But the effects depend on the success of the implementation. Using a factor analysis, an index was built to divide the care providers into “optimal” and “suboptimal” RAI users.
Some factors that seem to lead to a rather successful implementation could be detected: A higher proportion of qualified staff, a lower perceived quantitative workload, a small size of care providers, the type of ownership (for-profit) and a late entry in study [Correction made here after initial online publication.].
The success or failure of the implementation of an outcome-oriented control instrument is determined by professional, organizational restrictions. The results show that a better implementation leads to better outcomes for clients. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.