Communicated by A. Jamie Cuticchia
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2006
This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A. Published in 2006 by Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Volume 27, Issue 9, pages 957–964, September 2006
How to Cite
McDonald, R., Scott Winters, R., Ankuda, C. K., Murphy, J. A., Rogers, A. E., Pereira, F., Greenblatt, M. S. and White, P. S. (2006), An automated procedure to identify biomedical articles that contain cancer-associated gene variants. Hum. Mutat., 27: 957–964. doi: 10.1002/humu.20363
This article is a US government work, and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
- Issue published online: 17 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 APR 2006
- Manuscript Received: 5 DEC 2005
- David Lawrence Altschuler Endowed Chair
- Penn Genomics Institute
- National Science Foundation (NSF) Information Technology Research. Grant Number: 0205448
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute. Grant Number: CA 96536
- text mining;
- conditional random fields;
- relevance ranking
The proliferation of biomedical literature makes it increasingly difficult for researchers to find and manage relevant information. However, identifying research articles containing mutation data, a requisite first step in integrating large and complex mutation data sets, is currently tedious, time-consuming and imprecise. More effective mechanisms for identifying articles containing mutation information would be beneficial both for the curation of mutation databases and for individual researchers. We developed an automated method that uses information extraction, classifier, and relevance ranking techniques to determine the likelihood of MEDLINE abstracts containing information regarding genomic variation data suitable for inclusion in mutation databases. We targeted the CDKN2A (p16) gene and the procedure for document identification currently used by CDKN2A Database curators as a measure of feasibility. A set of abstracts was manually identified from a MEDLINE search as potentially containing specific CDKN2A mutation events. A subset of these abstracts was used as a training set for a maximum entropy classifier to identify text features distinguishing “relevant” from “not relevant” abstracts. Each document was represented as a set of indicative word, word pair, and entity tagger-derived genomic variation features. When applied to a test set of 200 candidate abstracts, the classifier predicted 88 articles as being relevant; of these, 29 of 32 manuscripts in which manual curation found CDKN2A sequence variants were positively predicted. Thus, the set of potentially useful articles that a manual curator would have to review was reduced by 56%, maintaining 91% recall (sensitivity) and more than doubling precision (positive predictive value). Subsequent expansion of the training set to 494 articles yielded similar precision and recall rates, and comparison of the original and expanded trials demonstrated that the average precision improved with the larger data set. Our results show that automated systems can effectively identify article subsets relevant to a given task and may prove to be powerful tools for the broader research community. This procedure can be readily adapted to any or all genes, organisms, or sets of documents. Hum Mutat 0, 1–8, 2006. Published 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.