Communicated by Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Research Article
Comparative analysis of germline and somatic microlesion mutational spectra in 17 human tumor suppressor genes†
Article first published online: 22 MAR 2011
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21483
© 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ivanov, D., Hamby, S. E., Stenson, P. D., Phillips, A. D., Kehrer-Sawatzki, H., Cooper, D. N. and Chuzhanova, N. (2011), Comparative analysis of germline and somatic microlesion mutational spectra in 17 human tumor suppressor genes. Hum. Mutat., 32: 620–632. doi: 10.1002/humu.21483
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 22 MAR 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 24 FEB 2011 03:12PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 FEB 2011
- Manuscript Received: 7 OCT 2010
Keywords:
- germline and somatic mutational spectra;
- tumor suppressor genes;
- recurrent mutation;
- mutation hotspot;
- non-B DNA;
- driver mutations
Abstract
Mutations associated with tumorigenesis may either arise somatically or can be inherited through the germline. We performed a comparison of somatic, germline, shared (found in both soma and germline) and somatic recurrent mutational spectra for 17 human tumor suppressor genes, which focused upon missense single base-pair substitutions and microdeletions/microinsertions. Somatic and germline mutational spectra were similar in relation to C.G>T.A transitions but differed with respect to the frequency of A.T>G.C, A.T>T.A, and C.G>A.T substitutions. Shared missense mutations were characterized by higher mutability rates, greater physicochemical differences between wild-type and mutant residues, and a tendency to occur in evolutionarily conserved residues and within CpG/CpHpG oligonucleotides. Mononucleotide runs (≥4 bp) were identified as hotspots for shared microdeletions/microinsertions. Both germline and somatic microdeletions/microinsertions were found to be significantly overrepresented within the “indel-hotspot” motif, GTAAGT. Using a naïve Bayes' classifier trained to discriminate between five missense mutation groups, 63% of mutations in our dataset were on average correctly recognized. Applying this classifier to an independent dataset of probable driver mutations, we concluded that ∼50% of these somatic missense mutations possess features consistent with their being either shared or recurrent, suggesting that a disproportionate number of such lesions are likely to be drivers of tumorigenesis. Hum Mutat 32:1–13, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1098-1004/asset/HUMU_left.gif?v=1&s=4065e12063da1c0efe3c1a74d4f13c3cd92fba18)
1098-1004/asset/HUMU_right.gif?v=1&s=58026811b6aa5bee5a3d0e0563a705f8b681f34d)
