Communicated by Peter Oefner
Mutation in Brief
Molecular dissection of the Y chromosome haplogroup E-M78 (E3b1a): a posteriori evaluation of a microsatellite-network-based approach through six new biallelic markers†‡
Article first published online: 11 JUL 2006
DOI: 10.1002/humu.9445
© 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cruciani, F., La Fratta, R., Torroni, A., Underhill, P. A. and Scozzari, R. (2006), Molecular dissection of the Y chromosome haplogroup E-M78 (E3b1a): a posteriori evaluation of a microsatellite-network-based approach through six new biallelic markers. Hum. Mutat., 27: 831–832. doi: 10.1002/humu.9445
- †
- ‡
Online Citation: Human Mutation, Mutation in Brief #916 (2006) Online http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/homepages/38515/pdf/916.pdf
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 11 JUL 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 APR 2006
- Manuscript Received: 12 FEB 2006
- Abstract
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Y-chromosome;
- microsatellite;
- polymorphism;
- haplogroup;
- network;
- human evolution
Abstract
The human Y chromosome haplogroup E-M78 (E3b1a) occurs commonly and is distributed in northern and eastern Africa, western Asia, and all of Europe. Previously, only two rarely observed internal biallelic markers (UEPs) were known within the E-M78 clade. Here we report the identification of six novel UEPs that significantly refine the phylogeny of this haplogroup. Then, we evaluate the correspondence between the newly defined sub-haplogroups and the E-M78 haplotype clusters previously identified by an 11-microsatellite loci-based network encompassing 232 chromosomes (Cruciani et al., 2004). We observed considerable correspondence between the trees generated by the two types of markers, but also noted important discrepancies between microsatellite and UEP findings. Overall, this analysis reveals that the currently visible terminal branches of the Y tree still contain a large amount of information, in terms of undiscovered biallelic markers, and that caution is needed when using the microsatellite alleles as surrogates of unique event polymorphisms. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1098-1004/asset/HUMU_left.gif?v=1&s=4065e12063da1c0efe3c1a74d4f13c3cd92fba18)
1098-1004/asset/HUMU_right.gif?v=1&s=58026811b6aa5bee5a3d0e0563a705f8b681f34d)
1098-1004/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b02ab57a64d28403f477b09d50f72a4d63f4c8eb)