Research Article
Evaluation of gridded snow water equivalent and satellite snow cover products for mountain basins in a hydrologic model
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2006
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6130
Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)
Hydrological Processes
Special Issue: Eastern Snow Conference/Western Snow Conference
Volume 20, Issue 4, pages 673–688, 15 March 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Dressler, K. A., Leavesley, G. H., Bales, R. C. and Fassnacht, S. R. (2006), Evaluation of gridded snow water equivalent and satellite snow cover products for mountain basins in a hydrologic model. Hydrol. Process., 20: 673–688. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6130
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 FEB 2006
- Article first published online: 27 FEB 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 SEP 2005
- Manuscript Received: 10 JUN 2005
Funded by
- NASA Southwest Regional Earth Science Applications Center. Grant Number: NAG13-99005
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: NSF EAR9876800
- NASA/Raytheon Hydrological Data and Information System. Grant Numbers: NAG5-8503, NAG-3006
- NOAA-OGP. Grant Number: NA116GP2758
- UC Merced School of Engineering
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- assimilation;
- snow water equivalent;
- snow-covered area;
- hydrologic modelling;
- PRMS
Abstract
The USGS precipitation-runoff modelling system (PRMS) hydrologic model was used to evaluate experimental, gridded, 1 km2 snow-covered area (SCA) and snow water equivalent (SWE) products for two headwater basins within the Rio Grande (i.e. upper Rio Grande River basin) and Salt River (i.e. Black River basin) drainages in the southwestern USA. The SCA product was the fraction of each 1 km2 pixel covered by snow and was derived from NOAA advanced very high-resolution radiometer imagery. The SWE product was developed by multiplying the SCA product by SWE estimates interpolated from National Resources Conservation Service snow telemetry point measurements for a 6 year period (1995-2000). Measured SCA and SWE estimates were consistently lower than values estimated from temperature and precipitation within PRMS. The greatest differences occurred in the relatively complex terrain of the Rio Grande basin, as opposed to the relatively homogeneous terrain of the Black River basin, where differences were small. Differences between modelled and measured snow were different for the accumulation period versus the ablation period and had an elevational trend. Assimilating the measured snowfields into a version of PRMS calibrated to achieve water balance without assimilation led to reduced performance in estimating streamflow for the Rio Grande and increased performance in estimating streamflow for the Black River basin. Correcting the measured SCA and SWE for canopy effects improved simulations by adding snow mostly in the mid-to-high elevations, where satellite estimates of SCA are lower than model estimates. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)