Research Article
Interpolating local snow depth data: an evaluation of methods
Article first published online: 8 JUN 2006
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6199
Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)
Hydrological Processes
Special Issue: Contribution from Glaciers and Snow Cover to Runoff from the Mountains in Different Climates
Volume 20, Issue 10, pages 2217–2232, 30 June 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
López-Moreno, J. I. and Nogués-Bravo, D. (2006), Interpolating local snow depth data: an evaluation of methods. Hydrol. Process., 20: 2217–2232. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6199
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 JUN 2006
- Article first published online: 8 JUN 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 SEP 2005
- Manuscript Received: 10 MAY 2005
Funded by
- Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (CICYT). Grant Numbers: REN 2003-08678/HID, CGL 2004-04919-c02-01
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- snowpack;
- spatial interpolation;
- error estimators;
- central Spanish Pyrenees
Abstract
Snow depth measurements have been taken since 1986 at 106 snow poles distributed in the Spanish Pyrenees. Here, we compared the capacity of several local, geostatistical and global interpolator methods for mapping the spatial distribution of averaged snowpack (1986–2000) and the snowpack distribution in two single years with different climatic conditions. The error estimators indicate that the terrain complexity of the area makes it difficult to apply local and geostatistical methods satisfactorily. Regression-tree models provide an accurate description of the data set used (the calibration phase), but they show a relatively low predictive capability for the study case (the validation phase). Using linear regression and generalized additive models (GAMs), we achieved more robust estimations than by means of a regression-tree model. The GAMs give the most accurate prediction because they consider the non-linear relationships between snowpack and the external characteristics (physical features) of the sampling points. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)