Research Article
Springs on rangelands: runoff dynamics and influence of woody plant cover
Article first published online: 25 SEP 2006
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6332
Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)
Hydrological Processes
Special Issue: Emerging Issues in Rangeland Ecohydrology
Volume 20, Issue 15, pages 3277–3288, 15 October 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Huang, Y., Wilcox, B. P., Stern, L. and Perotto-Baldivieso, H. (2006), Springs on rangelands: runoff dynamics and influence of woody plant cover. Hydrol. Process., 20: 3277–3288. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6332
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 SEP 2006
- Article first published online: 25 SEP 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 DEC 2005
- Manuscript Received: 1 JUN 2005
Funded by
- Edwards Aquifer Authority
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority
- Edward Region GCLI
- San Antonio Water System
- National Science Foundation (NSF). Grant Number: 0233667
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- water yield;
- streamflow;
- woody plants;
- range hydrology;
- spring flow;
- ecohydrology;
- Edwards Plateau
Abstract
To date, little effort has been devoted to understanding the nature of streamflow from dryland catchments where springs are found, and little is known about how changes in vegetation may alter that streamflow. But where they do occur in drylands, springs are important—ecologically as well as hydrologically. Areas that naturally support spring flow, such as those having an underlying karst geology, hold the most promise for increasing streamflow through control of woody plants. For rangelands, this possibility is a particularly appealing one. However, few studies have documented that such a method is effective (except in Mediterranean climates). For this reason, we studied runoff generation for a site on the Edwards Plateau of Texas: a first-order (19-ha) rangeland catchment supplied with intermittent streamflow from a spring at its base. Using hydrometric as well as isotopic characterization, we evaluated the extent to which runoff changed following removal of most of the woody plant cover (predominantly Ashe juniper). After monitoring streamflow for 4 years (two before plant removal and two following removal), we found that (1) streamflow increased following removal of juniper, by about 46 mm annually, except during the summer; (2) for the 4 years of observation, runoff made up about 22% of the water budget, with baseflow from the spring accounting for about half the total flow; and (3) hydrograph separation analysis conducted for two events following juniper removal indicated that pre-event water made up 25% and 50% of the runoff (these numbers represent lower bounds for the percentage of water derived from the spring during storm events). These findings are important, not only because they add to our understanding of runoff generation from spring-fed catchments, but also in particular because they demonstrate that where springs are present, decreasing woody plant cover may augment runoff. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)