Research Article
The effects of water table draw-down (as a surrogate for climate change) on the hydrology of a fen peatland, Canada
Article first published online: 18 OCT 2006
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6376
Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)
Hydrological Processes
Special Issue: Canadian Geophysical Union — Hydrology Section
Volume 20, Issue 17, pages 3589–3600, 15 November 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Whittington, P. N. and Price, J. S. (2006), The effects of water table draw-down (as a surrogate for climate change) on the hydrology of a fen peatland, Canada. Hydrol. Process., 20: 3589–3600. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6376
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2006
- Article first published online: 18 OCT 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 NOV 2005
- Manuscript Received: 1 AUG 2005
Funded by
- Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- patterned peatland;
- water table draw-down;
- peat physical properties;
- climate change;
- compression
Abstract
Hydrological response to climate change may alter the biogeochemical role that peatlands play in the global climate system, so an understanding of the nature and magnitude of this response is important. In 2002, the water table in a fen peatland near Quebec City was lowered by ∼20 cm (Experimental site), and hydrological response was measured compared to Control (no manipulation) and Drained (previously drained c. 1994) sites. Because of the draw-down, the surface in the Experimental pool decreased 5, 15 and 20 cm in the ridge, lawn and mat, respectively, increasing bulk density by ∼60% in the Experimental lawn. Hydraulic conductivity (K) generally decreased with depth and from Control (25–125 cm) 10−1 to 10−5 cm s−1 to Experimental (25–125 cm) 10−2 to 10−7 cm s−1 and to Drained (25–75 cm) 10−2 to 10−6 cm s−1. In similar topographic locations (ridge, lawn, mat), K trended Control > Experimental > Drained, usually by an order of magnitude at similar depths in similar topographic locations. Water table fluctuations in the Drained site averaged twice those of the Control site. The water table in the Control lawn remained at a stable depth relative to the surface (∼− 1 cm) because the lawn peat floats with changes in water table position. However, the Drained lawn peat was more rigid because of the denser degraded peat, forcing the water to fluctuate relative to the surface and further enhancing peat decay and densification. This provides a positive feedback loop that could intensify further peat degradation, changing the carbon cycling dynamics. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)