Research Article
Runoff modelling of the glacierized Alpine Upper Salzach basin (Austria): multi-criteria result validation
Article first published online: 26 AUG 2008
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7112
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)
Hydrological Processes
Special Issue: Glaciers in Watershed and Global Hydrology
Volume 22, Issue 19, pages 3950–3964, 15 September 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Koboltschnig, G. R., Schöner, W., Zappa, M., Kroisleitner, C. and Holzmann, H. (2008), Runoff modelling of the glacierized Alpine Upper Salzach basin (Austria): multi-criteria result validation. Hydrol. Process., 22: 3950–3964. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7112
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 AUG 2008
- Article first published online: 26 AUG 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Received: 12 OCT 2007
Funded by
- Austrian Academy of Sciences
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- glacier melt;
- glacier mass balance;
- snow melt;
- SCA remote sensing;
- water balance of high elevation sites
Abstract
Snow cover and glaciers are the most important long-term forms of water storage and, hence, the main sources of runoff during the ablation period for many alpine headwater basins. We therefore investigated the application of the conceptual, distributed hydrological precipitation runoff evapotranspiration hydrological response unit model (PREVAH) to the alpine glacierized headwater basin of the Upper Salzach (593 km2, 5% glacierized) river in Austria. Hourly meteorological data from 17 stations for a 6-year period were available for the calibration and validation of the hourly runoff simulations. Multi-criteria validation included hourly discharge, snow covered area (SCA), and glacier mass balances. SCA maps were generated from optical satellite images for six dates. These maps were compared to simulated maps of SCA to (1) calculate differences in SCA, (2) calculate altitudinal differences, and (3) show the ability to accurately model snow cover on different aspects. The differences between observed and simulated SCA for glacierized areas were between 1 and 9% during June and July, and between 10 and 36% during August and September observations. In general, the model overestimated SCA, which is the result of PREVAH not including redistribution of snow by wind or avalanches. The temporal variability of the simulated mass balance agreed well with observations from surrounding glaciers. Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency Criteria (R2) of the hourly discharge simulations were between 0·83 and 0·89 with the exception of the extreme summer of 2003 which had an R2 of 0·74. Contributions of glacier melt (firn/ice melt) to annual total runoff were between 1 and 4%. Again, the exception was 2003, when glaciers contributed 15% of the annual runoff and 60% to the August runoff alone. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)