Research Article
A new temperature based method to separate rain and snow
Article first published online: 15 OCT 2008
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7131
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kienzle, S. W. (2008), A new temperature based method to separate rain and snow. Hydrol. Process., 22: 5067–5085. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7131
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 DEC 2008
- Article first published online: 15 OCT 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 JUL 2008
- Manuscript Received: 10 JAN 2008
Funded by
- Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Water Research. Grant Number: 42321
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- precipitation separation;
- snow;
- rain;
- mean annual snowfall;
- sensitivity analysis;
- model intercomparison analysis
Abstract
This paper presents the development and testing of a new method to estimate daily snowfall from precipitation and associated temperature records. The new method requires two variables; the threshold mean daily air temperature at which 50% of precipitation is considered snow, and the temperature range within which mixed precipitation can occur. Sensitivity analyses using 15 climate stations across south-western Alberta, Canada, and ranging from prairie to alpine regions investigates the sensitivity of those two variables on mean annual snowfall (MAS), the coefficient of determination, and the MAS-weighted coefficient of determination. Existing methods, including the static threshold method, one linear transition method used by Quick and Pipes, and the Leavesley method employed in the PRMS hydrological modelling system are compared with the new method, using a total of 963 years of daily data from the 15 climate stations used for the sensitivity analyses. Four different approaches to using the two input variables (threshold temperature and range) were tested and statistically compared: mean annual variables based on the 15 stations, mean annual variables for each station, mean monthly variables for each station, and a sine curve representing seasonal variation of the variables. In almost all cases the proposed new method resulted in higher MAS-weighted coefficients of determination, and, on average, they were significantly different from those of other methods. The paper concludes with a decision tree to help decide which method and approach to apply under a variety of data availabilities. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1085/asset/HYP_left.gif?v=1&s=8c6e69ce38a58268c0e774ff4d5fcba763fb1022)
1099-1085/asset/HYP_right.gif?v=1&s=2949a9e19dd518eed31b7ef95c7b6631bb69e22b)
1099-1085/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=76d4ef1a9cca2fed0ae2507c6de984a0c96ede1d)