Environmental Policy & Regulation
Simplification of biotic ligand models of Cu, Ni, and Zn by 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter transfer functions
Article first published online: 3 MAY 2012
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1298
Copyright © 2012 SETAC
Issue

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume 8, Issue 4, pages 738–748, October 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Verschoor, A. J., Vink, J. P. and Vijver, M. G. (2012), Simplification of biotic ligand models of Cu, Ni, and Zn by 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter transfer functions. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 8: 738–748. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1298
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 3 MAY 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 8 FEB 2012 02:29PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 30 JAN 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 16 DEC 2011
- Manuscript Received: 22 SEP 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Biotic ligand models;
- Risk assessment;
- Regulatory tools;
- Water Framework Directive;
- Metals;
- Speciation;
- Surface water
Abstract
Biotic ligand models for calculation of watertype-specific no effect concentrations are recognized as a major improvement in risk assessment of metals in surface waters. Model complexity and data requirement, however, hamper the regulatory implementation. To facilitate regulatory use, biotic ligand models (BLM) for the calculation of Ni, Cu, and Zn HC5 values were simplified to linear equations with an acceptable level of accuracy, requiring a maximum of 3 measured water chemistry parameters. In single-parameter models, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is the only significant parameter with an accuracy of 72%–75% to predict HC5s computed by the full BLMs. In 2-parameter models, Mg, Ca, or pH are selected by stepwise multiple regression for Ni, Cu, and Zn HC5, respectively, and increase the accuracy to 87%–94%. The accuracy is further increased by addition of a third parameter to 88%–97%. Three-parameter models have DOC and pH in common, the third parameter is Mg, Ca, or Na for HC5 of Ni, Cu, and Zn, respectively. Mechanisms of chemical speciation and competitive binding to the biotic ligand explain the selection of these parameters. User-defined requirements, such as desired level of reliability and the availability of measured data, determine the selection of functions to predict HC5. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 738–748. © 2012 SETAC

1551-3793/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=f3927167b091c84d51d45fbfb21043919822dc93)
1551-3793/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=046acc572bd7fc6893d0b88d876eb3ede9215f68)