SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Adam D. 2006. 14C-triclosan: Route and rate of degradation in aerobic aquatic sediment systems. Prepared by RCC Ltd, Switzerland. Prepared for Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc. RCC Study #A33300.
  • Bester K. 2003. Triclosan in a sewage treatment process – balances and monitoring data. Water Res 37: 38913896.
  • Bester K. 2005. Fate of triclosan and triclosan-methyl in sewage treatment plants and surface waters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49: 917.
  • Beyer A, Wania F, Guin T, Mackay D, Matthies M. 2002. Selecting internally consistent physiochemical properties of organic compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 941953.
  • Boyd GR, Reemtsma H, Grimm DA, Mitra S. 2003. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in surface and treated waters of Louisiana, USA and Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 311: 135149.
  • BudavariS, editor. 1989. The Merck index, 11th ed. Rahway (NJ): Merck. p 9573.
  • Christensen KP. 1994a. Triclosan – aerobic biodegradation in water. Springborn Laboratories, Inc., Wareham (MA): Prepared for Colgate-Palmolive Company, Piscataway (NJ): SLI Report# 93-4-4731.
  • Christensen KP. 1994b. Triclosan - determination of anaerobic aquatic biodegradation. Springborn Laboratories, Inc., Wareham (MA): Prepared for The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati (OH): SLI Report# 93-12-5076.
  • Ciba Specialty Chemical Corporation. 2004. Material Safety Data Sheet: Irgasan DP 300.
  • Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, Gans O, Kroiss H. 2005. The solids retention time—A suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res 39: 97106.
  • Clark B, Henry JG, Mackay D. 1995. Fugacity analysis and model of organic chemical fate in a sewage treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 29: 14881494.
  • [EC] European Commission. 2001. Pollutants in urban wastewater and sewage sludge. Final Report.
  • Federle TW, Kaiser SK, Nuck BA. 2002. Fate and effects of triclosan in activated sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 13301337.
  • Fuchsman P, Lyndall J, Bock M, Lauren D, Barber T, Leigh K, Perruchon E, Capdevielle M. 2010. Terrestrial ecological risk evaluation for triclosan in land-applied biosolids. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 405418 (this issue).
  • Gómez MJ, Bueno MJM, Lacorte S, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A. 2007. Pilot survey monitoring pharmaceuticals and related compounds in a sewage treatment plant located on the Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere 66: 9931002.
  • Hanstveit AO, Hamwijk C. 2003. Environmental report. V5330/01. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc.
  • Heidler J, Halden RU. 2007. Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment. Chemosphere 66: 362369.
  • Jacangelo JG, Trussell RR. 2002. International report: Water and wastewater disinfectionüTrends, issues and practices. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 2: 147157.
  • Jäkel K. 1990. Report on dissociation constant in water. Ciba-Geigy Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. Test #FC90-1T.
  • Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ. 2009. The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res 43: 363380.
  • Kinney CA, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD, Burkhardt MR, Werner SL, Cahill JD, Jorgensen GR. 2006. Survey of organic wastewater contaminants in biosolids destined for land application. Environ Sci Technol 40: 72077215.
  • La Guardia MJ, Hale RC, Harvey E, Bush EO, Mainor TM, Gaylor MO. 2004. Organic contaminants of emerging concern in land-applied sewage sludge (biosolids). J Residuals Sci Technol 1: 111122.
  • Lindström A, Buerge IJ, Poiger T, Bergqvist PA, Müller MD, Buser HR. 2002. Occurrence and environmental behavior of the bactericide triclosan in and its methyl derivative in surface waters and in wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 36: 23222329.
  • Lishman L, Smyth SA, Sarafin K, Kleywegt S, Toito J, Peart T, Lee B, Servos M, Beland M, Seto P. 2006. Occurrence and reductions of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and estrogens by municipal wastewater treatment plants in Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 367: 544558.
  • Lyndall J, Fuchsman P, Bock M, Barber T, Lauren D, Leigh K, Perruchon E, Capdevielle M. 2010. Probabilistic risk evaluation for triclosan in surface water, sediments, and aquatic biota tissues. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 419440 (this issue).
  • Mackay D. 2001. Multimedia environmental models: The fugacity approach, 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis/CRC. 257 p.
  • McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff WS. 2002. Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 13231329.
  • Meylan WM, Howard PH. 1993. Computer estimation of the atmospheric gas-phase reaction rate of organic compounds with hydroxyl radicals and ozone. Chemosphere 26: 22932299.
  • Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H, Kiri K, Takada H. 2006. Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water Res 40: 32973303.
  • NeelyWB, BlauGE, editors. 1985. Environmental exposure from chemicals. Vol 1, Boca Raton (FL): CRC.
  • [NICNAS] Australian National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. 2009. Triclosan. Priority Existing Chemical Report No. 30. Government Department of Health and Ageing, Sydney, NSW.
  • Paxeus N. 2004. Removal of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NDAIDs), gemfibrozil, carbamazepine, beta-blockers, trimethoprim, and triclosan in conventional wastewater treatment plants in 5 EU countries and their discharge to the aquatic environment. Water Sci Technol 50: 253260.
  • Pointurier R, Volz E. 1990. Report on water solubility. Ciba Specialty Chemical, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Qasim SR. 1999. Wastewater treatment plants planning, design, and operation, 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 1107 p.
  • Reimer S. 2003. One example of how emerging pollutants come to our attention. US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Laboratory.
  • Reiss R, Mackay N, Habig C, Griffin J. 2002. An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in lotic systems following discharge from wastewater treatment plants in the United States. Environ Toxicol Chem 11: 24832492.
  • Sabaliunas D, Webb SF, Hauk A, Jacob M, Eckhoff WS. 2003. Environmental fate of triclosan in the River Aire Basin, UK. Water Res 37: 31453154.
  • Shelver WL, Kamp LM, Church JL, Rubio FM. 2007. Measurement of triclosan in water using a magnetic particle enzyme immunoassay. J Agric Food Chem 55: 37583763.
  • Singer H, Muller S, Tixier C, Pillonel L. 2002. Triclosan: Occurrence and fate of a widely used biocide in the aquatic environment: Field measurements in wastewater treatment plants, surface waters, and lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 36: 49985004.
  • Snyder SA, Lei H, Wert EC. 2008. Removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals during water treatment. In: AgaDS, editor. Fate of pharmaceuticals in the environment and in water treatment systems, Boca Raton (FL): CRC. p 229259.
  • Speir T, Northcott G. 2006. Organic residues in sewage biosolids: Summary of the New Zealand CDRP project results. Presentation at the Biosolids Specialty III Conference, 7–8 June 2006, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Spellman FR. 2003. Handbook of water and wastewater treatment plant operations, Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 661 p.
  • Stasinakis AS, Petalas AV, Mamais D, Thomaidis NS, Gatidou G, Lekkas TD. 2007. Investigation of triclosan fate and toxicity in continuous-flow activated sludge systems. Chemosphere 68: 375381.
  • Stasinakis AS, Petalas AV, Mamais D, Thomaidis NS. 2008. Application of the OECD 301F respirometric test for the biodegradability assessment of various potential endocrine disrupting chemicals. Bioresour Technol 99: 34583467.
  • Ternes TA, Joss A, Siegrist H. 2004. Scrutinizing pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 38: 393A399A.
  • Thomas PM, Foster GD. 2005. Tracking acidic pharmaceuticals, caffeine, and triclosan through the wastewater treatment process. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 2530.
  • Thompson A, Griffin P, Steutz R, Cartmell E. 2005. The fate and removal of triclosan during wastewater treatment. Water Environ Res 77: 6367.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000a. Clean watersheds needs survey: Report to Congress 2000. Office of Wastewater Management. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/cwns/2000rtc/toc.htm
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000b. Interim guidance for using ready and inherent biodegradability tests to derive input data for multimedia models and wastewater treatment plants (WWT) models. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. [cited 2000 September 1]. Available from: http://epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/halflife.htm
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000c. EPI Suite v 3.12 Office of Pollution Protection and Toxics.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Region/ORD workshop on emerging pollutants: Summary report. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/osp/regions/emerpoll_rep.pdf
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Targeted national sewage sludge survey statistical analysis report. EPA-822-R- 08-018. Office of Water, Washington, DC.
  • Waltman EL, Venables BJ, Waller WT. 2006. Triclosan in a north Texas wastewater treatment plant and the influent and effluent of an experimental constructed wetland. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 367372.
  • Wyler H, Jäkel K. 1990. Report on partition coefficient. Ciba-Geigy Ltd, Basle, Switzerland. Test #FC-90/1T.
  • Yalkowsky SH, Dannenfelser RM. 1992. The AQUASOL DATABASE of aqueous solubility. Version 5, Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona, College of Pharmacy.
  • Ying GG, Kookana RS. 2007. Triclosan in wastewaters and biosolids from Australian wastewater treatment plants. Environ Int 33: 199205.