SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    John W Green, Issues with using only regression models for ecotoxicity studies, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2016, 12, 1
  2. 2
    Yuichi Iwasaki, Kensuke Kotani, Shosaku Kashiwada, Shigeki Masunaga, Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?, Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49, 15, 9326

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Amy Beasley, Scott E. Belanger, Jessica L. Brill, Ryan R. Otter, Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2015, 34, 10
  4. 4
    Christopher A. Mebane, In Response: Biological arguments for selecting effect sizes in ecotoxicological testing—A governmental perspective, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2015, 34, 11
  5. 5
    John W. Green, In Response: Challenges for statistical evaluation of ecotoxicological experiments—An industry perspective, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2015, 34, 11
  6. 6
    Tjalling Jager, Reconsidering sufficient and optimal test design in acute toxicity testing, Ecotoxicology, 2014, 23, 1, 38

    CrossRef

  7. You have free access to this content7
    Yuichi Iwasaki, Niklas Hanson, Using population level consequences as a basis for determining the “x” in ECx for toxicity testing, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2013, 9, 2
  8. 8
    Peter Calow, Valery E Forbes, Ecotoxicology, eLS,