SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Daily G. 1997. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press. 392 p.
  • [Defra] Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2007. An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 66 p.
  • Diamond J. 2004. Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. London (UK): Viking. 608 p.
  • Diederichs N, Markewicz T, Mander M, Martens A, Zama Ngubane S. 2002. eThekwini catchments: A strategic tool for management. South Africa: eThekwini Municipality.
  • DuBowy PJ. 2010. Navigation, flood risk management, and Mississippi River ecosystem rehabilitation. In: Potter KW, Frevert DK, editors. Watershed Management 2010: Innovations in watershed management under land use and climate change. Proceedings of the 2010 Watershed Management Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, August 23–27, 2010, p 431442, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41143(394)39
  • Dufour S, Piegay H. 2009. From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Res App 25:568581.
  • Eden S, Tunstall S. 2006. Ecological versus social restoration? Environ Plann C: Govt Policy 24:661680.
  • Eigenbrod F, Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Heinemeyer A, Jackson SF, Parnell M, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ. 2009. Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:29032911.
  • Everard M. 2009. The Business of biodiversity. Ashurst (UK): WIT Press. 208 p.
  • Everard M. 2011. Common ground: The sharing of land and landscapes for sustainability. London (UK): Zed Books. 192 p.
  • Everard M. 2012a. 25. What have rivers ever done for us? Ecosystem services and river systems. In: Boon PJ, Raven PJ, editors. River conservation and management. Chichester (UK): Wiley. p 313324.
  • Everard M. 2012b. Why does ‘good ecological status’ matter? Water Environ J 26:165174.
  • Everard M, Bramley M, Tatem K, Appleby T, Watts W. 2009. Flood management: From defense to sustainability. Environmental Liability 2:3549.
  • Everard M, Moggridge HL. 2012. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosystems 15:293314.
  • Everard M, Shuker L, Gurnell AM. 2012. Mayesbrook Park, East London: An ecosystem services assessment. Environment Agency Evidence report. The Rivers Trust. Available from: http://www.theriverstrust.org/projects/water/water_project.html
  • Findlay SJ, Taylor MP. 2006. Why rehabilitate urban river systems? Area 38:312325.
  • Gleick PH. 2000. The changing water paradigm: A look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Intl 25:127138.
  • HM Government. 2011. The natural choice: Securing the value of nature. London (UK): The Stationary Office. 78 p.
  • Johnston P, Everard M, Santillo D, Robèrt K-H. 2007. Commentaries: Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut R 14:6066.
  • Maltby LL, Paetzold A, Warren PH. 2010. Sustaining industrial activity and ecological quality: the potential role of an ecosystem services approach. In: Batty LC, Hallberg KB, editors. Ecology of industrial pollution. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 327344.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005a. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press. 137 p.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005b. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. 68 p.
  • Niemelä J, Saarela R-R, Söderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Väre S, Kotze DJ. 2010. Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers Conserv 19:32253243.
  • [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010. Paying for biodiversity: Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services. Paris: OECD Publishing. 196 p.
  • Paetzold A, Warren PH, Maltby LL. 2010. A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecol Compl 7:273281.
  • Times of India. 2012. Maha must assess its ecosystem: Scientists. 2nd April 2012. Mumbai: Times of India.
  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
  • [UNFPA] United Nations Population Fund. 2007. State of the world population 2007: Unleashing the potential of urban growth. New York (NY): United Nations.
  • Whitford V, Ennos AR, Handley JF. 2001. City form and natural process: Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their implication to Merseyside, UK. Landscape Urban Plan 57:91103.
  • World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and development: A new framework for better decision-making. London (UK): Earthscan. 404 p.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. 400 p.