SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ashford NA, Hall RP, Ashford RH. 2012. The crisis in employment and consumer demand: Reconciliation with environmental sustainability. EIST 2:122.
  • Ayres RU. 2006. Turning point: The end of exponential growth? Technol Forecast Soc Change 73:11881203.
  • Baronsky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, Getz WM, Harte J, Hastings A, Marquet PA., et al. 2012. Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere. Nature 486:5258.
  • Barton DN, Kuikka S, Varis O, Uusitalo L, Jørgen H, Borsku M, de la Herz A, Farmani R, Johnson S, Linnell JDC. 2012. Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 8:418429.
  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR, Flick P, Pilgrim J, Oldfield S, Magin G., et al. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Cons Biol 16:909923.
  • Butler PB, Larsen-Hallock L, Lewis R, Glenn C, Armstead R. 2011. Metrics for integrating sustainability evaluations into remediation projects. Remed J 21:8187.
  • Cairns J. 2009. The influence of contaminated sediments on sustainable use of the planet. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 5, Part T: 1–19. Available from: DOI 10.1007/698_5_110
  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:5967.
  • Carey JM, Burgman MA, Chee YE. 2004. Risk assessment and the concept of ecosystem condition in park management. Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 13. Parks Victoria, Melbourne. [cited 2012 January]. Available from http://parkweb.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/314451/19_1163.pdf
  • Clemen RT, Reilly T. 2003. Making hard decisions with DecisionTools. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press. 752 p.
  • Costanza R, Alperovitz G, Daly HE, Farley J, Franco C, Jackson T, Kubiszewski I, Schor J, Victor P. 2012. Building a sustainable and desirable economy-in-society-in-nature. New York: United Nations Division for Sustainable Development.
  • Dale VH, Biddinger GR, Newman MC, Oris JT, Suter GW, Thompson T, Armitage TM, Meyer JL, Allen-King RM, Burton GA., et al. 2008. Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4:306313.
  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393408.
  • Etter A, McApine CA, Seabrook L, Wilson KA. 2011. Incorporating temporality and biophysical vulnerability to quantify the human spatial footprint on ecosystems. Biol Conserv 144:15851594.
  • Galic N, Schmolke A, Forbes VE, Baveco H, van den Brink P. 2012. The role of ecological models in linking ecological risk assessment to ecosystem services in agroecosystems. Sci Tot Environ 415:93100.
  • Glass JH, Scott AJ, Price MF. 2013. The power of the process: Co-producing a sustainability assessment toolkit for upland estate management in Scotland. Land Use Policy 30:254265.
  • Global Footprint Network. 2012. The National Footprint Accounts, 2011 edition. Oakland (CA): Global Footprint Network.
  • Graham CH, Mortiz C, Williams SE. 2006. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. PNAS 103:632636.
  • Gratwicke B, Speight MR. 2005. The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. J Fish Biol 66:650667.
  • Haines-Young R. 2011. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Progress Phys Geogr 35:681699.
  • Hämäläinen RP, Alaja S. 2008. The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis. Ecol Econ 68:556569.
  • Holzman DC. 2012. Accounting for nature's benefits: The dollar value of ecosystem services. Environ Health Perspect 120:a152a157.
  • Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O'Connor MI. 2012. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105108.
  • Johnson S, Low-Choy S, Mengersen K. 2012. Integrating Bayesian networks and geographic information systems: Good practice examples. Integr Environ Assess Manag 8:473479.
  • Karvera P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S. (editors). 2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 365 p.
  • Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. 2005. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:95108.
  • [KPMG] KPMG International. 2012. Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Available from: http://www.kpmg.com
  • Levin SA, Clark WC. 2010. Toward a science of sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference, Airlie Center, Warrenton, Virginia, Nov. 29–Dec. 2, 2009. CID Working Paper No. 196. Center for International Development at Harvard University. Available from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-workingpapers/cid-working-paper-no.-196
  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Seager TP, Bridges T, Gardner KH, Rogers SH, Belluck DA, Meyer A. 2006. Multicriteria decision analysis: A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments. Risk Analysis 26:6178.
  • Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services: Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185:5478.
  • Malczewski J. 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Intl J Geograph Inform Sci 20:703726.
  • Marttunen M, Hämäläinen RP. 1995. Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Eur J Op Res 87:551563.
  • [MEA] Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. Living beyond our means: Natural assets and human well-being. Statement from the Board. [cited 2012 March]. Available from: http://www.maweb.org/en/Reports.aspx
  • [NAP] National Academies Press. 2012. Ecosystem services: Charting a path to sustainability. Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries Conference, Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center, Irvine, California, November 10–11, 2011; The National Academies Keck Futures Initiative. [cited 2012 June]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu
  • [NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1996. Injury assessment: Guidance document for natural resource damage assessment under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Damage Assessment Remediation and Restoration Program. [cited 2012 January]. Available from: http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/1_d.html
  • [NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. Habitat equivalency analysis: An overview. Damage Assessment and Restoration Program. [cited 2008 September 15]. Available from: http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/heaoverv.pdf
  • Natural Capital Declaration. 2012. The Natural Capital Declaration: A commitment by the finance sector for Rio+20 and beyond. Available from: www.naturalcapitaldeclaration.org
  • Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp SK, Brown C., et al. 2012. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Tot Environ 415:3138.
  • Plowright RK, Sokolow SH, Gorman ME, Daszak P, Foley JE. 2008. Causal inference in disease ecology: investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence. Front Ecol Environ 6:420429.
  • Schultz MT, Borrowman TD, Small MJ. 2011. Bayesian networks for modeling dredging decisions. US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. ERDC/ELTR-11-14.
  • Smith CS, Howes AL, Price B, McAlpine CA. 2007. Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal—The Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi). Biol Conserv 139:333347.
  • Stelzenmüller V, Lee J, Garnacho E, Rogers SI. 2010. Assessment of a Bayesian Belief Network—GIS framework as a practical tool to support marine planning. Marine Poll Bull 60:17431745.
  • Suter GW, Maciorowski AF. 2012. The future of ecological assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16:12211226.
  • Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP, Munishi PKT, Willcock S, Ricketts T, Mwakalila S, Balmford A, Burgess ND, Marshall AR., et al. 2011. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modeling. J Environ Manag 92:563574.
  • Tallis H, Polasky S. 2011. Assessing multiple ecosystem services: An integrated tool for the real world. In: Karvera P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S, editors Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p 3452.
  • Thompson KM, Graham JD. 1996. Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:10081034.
  • Turner RK, Morse-Jones S, Fisher B. 2010. Ecosystem valuation: A sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185:79101.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund, process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA 540-R-97-006.
  • [USEPA BOSC] US Environmental Protection Agency, Board of Scientific Counselors. 2010. Proceedings of the USEPA Board of Scientific Counselors, Decision analysis: supporting environmental decision makers workshop. [cited 2012 September]. Available from: http://epa.gov/osp/bosc/pdf/deci1005proc.pdf.
  • [USEPA RAF] US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. 2010. Integrating ecological assessment and decision-making at EPA: A path forward results of a colloquium in response to Science Advisory Board and National Research Council recommendations. EPA/100/R-10/004.
  • [USEPA RAF] US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. 2003. Generic ecological assessment endpoints (GEAEs). EPA/630/P-02/004F.
  • [USEPA RAF] US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F.
  • [USEPA RAF] US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001.
  • [USEPA SAB] US Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board. 2007. Integrating ecological assessment and decision making at EPA. Science Advisory Board, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee. EPA-SAB-08-002.
  • von Stackelberg K, Burmistrov D, Linkov I, Cura J, Bridges TS. 2002. The use of spatial modeling in an aquatic food web to estimate exposure and risk. Sci Tot Environ 288:97110.
  • von Stackelberg K, Luoma S, McCormick R, Scrabis K, Dorward-King E, Polasky S. 2007. Complexity in ecological systems. In Stahl RG, Kapustka L, Munns W, Bruins R, editors. Valuation of ecological resources: Integration of ecological risk assessment and socio-economics to support environmental decisions. Pensacola (FL): SETAC Press. p 97128.
  • [WBCSD] World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2010. Guide to corporate ecosystem valuation: A framework for improving corporate decision-making. [cited 2011 December]. Available from: http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/ecosystems/cev/downloads.aspx
  • World Bank. 2012. Moving beyond GDP: How to factor natural capital into economic decision making. Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES). [cited 2012 June]. Available from: http://www.wavespartnership.org