EDITOR'S NOTE: This article represents 1 of 6 articles generated from a workshop entitled “Ecological Soil Levels: Next Steps in the Development of Metal Clean-Up Values” (September 2012, Sundance, Utah, USA). The purpose of the workshop was to provide managers and decision makers of contaminated sites in North America with appropriate methods for developing soil clean-up values that are protective of ecological resources. The workshop focused on metals and other inorganic contaminants because of their ubiquity at contaminated sites and because their natural occurrence makes it difficult to determine adverse levels.
Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes
Article first published online: 26 FEB 2014
© 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management Published by SETAC
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
How to Cite
Kuperman, R. G., Siciliano, S. D., Römbke, J. and Oorts, K. (2014), Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes. Integr Environ Assess Manag. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1513
- Article first published online: 26 FEB 2014
- Accepted manuscript online: 27 DEC 2013 01:20AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 DEC 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 21 JUN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 20 MAY 2013
- 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:1–18. ,
- 2007. Using landscape and depth gradients to decouple the impact of correlated environmental variables on soil microbial community composition. Soil Biol Biochem 39:505–516. , , , ,
- 2011. Evidence of high microbial abundance and spatial dependency in three arctic soil ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:2227–2232. , ,
- 2013. Microbial community responses to anthropogenically induced environmental change: Towards a systems approach. Ecol Lett 16:128–139. , , ,
- 2010. Life history determines biogeographical patterns of soil bacterial communities over multiple spatial scales. Mol Ecol 19:4315–4327. , , , ,
- 2005. Toxicity of heavy metals in soil assessed with various soil microbial and plant growth assays: As comparative study. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:634–640. , ,
- 1986. The myth of the most sensitive species. Bioscience 36:670–672.
- 2007. Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
- 2010. Low pore connectivity increases bacterial diversity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3936–3942. , , , , ,
- [CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2006. A protocol for the derivation of Environmental and Human Health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg, MB: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
- 1999. The role of soil microbial tests in ecological risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assessment 5:657–660.
- Deriving site-specific clean-up criteria to protect ecological receptors (plants and soil invertebrates) exposed to soil contaminants via the direct contact exposure pathway. Integr Environ Assess Manag. , , , , Forthcoming.
- [EC] European Commission. 2002. Guidance document on terrestrial ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev 2 final. [cited 2002 October 17]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/guidance/wrkdoc09_en.pdf
- [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008a. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
- [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
- [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix R.7.13-2: Environmental risk assessment for metals and metal compounds. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
- [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their residues (PPR) related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market-ecotoxicological studies. EFSA J 461:1–44.
- 2012. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils. Sci Total Environ 415:3–8. ,
- 2014. Next steps in the development of ecological soil clean-up values for metals. Integr Environ Assess Manag Available from: DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1451. ,
- 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:626–631. ,
- 1991. Factors affecting L-asparaginase activity in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 11:1–5. ,
- 1996. Changes in microbial community structure during long-term incubation in two soils experimentally contaminated with metals. Soil Biol Biochem 28:55–63. , ,
- 2009. Heavy metals and soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2031–2037. , ,
- 2004. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Appl Soil Ecol 25:63–84. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2000. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279–294. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2012. Validating potential toxicity assays to assess petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity in polar soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:402–407. , ,
- 1999. Soil microbial communities and ecological risk assessment: Risk assessors' perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:707–714. , , ,
- 2007. Derivation of soil values for the path “soil–soil organisms” for metals and selected organic compounds using species sensitivity distribution. Environ Sci Poll Res 14:308–318. , , ,
- 1999. Microbial endpoints: The rationale for their exclusion as ecological assessment endpoints. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:691–696.
- 2010. Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat Methods 7:813–819. , , , , ,
- 2008. Relationship between nitrifier and denitrifier community composition and abundance in predicting nitrous oxide emissions from ephemeral wetland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1114–1123. , , ,
- 2007. Assessing the potential of ammonia oxidizing bacteria to produce nitrous oxide in soils of a high arctic lowland ecosystem on Devon Island, Canada. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2001–2013. , , , , ,
- 2009. Bacteria, not archaea, restore nitrification in a zinc-contaminated soil. ISME J 3:916–923. , , , , ,
- 2007. Resistance and resilience of zinc tolerant nitrifying communities is unaffected in long-term zinc contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1828–1831. , , ,
- 2010. Extent of copper tolerance and consequences for functional stability of the ammonia-oxidizing community in long-term copper-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:27–37. , , , ,
- 1997. Measurement in assessing the risk of chemicals to the ecosystem. In: Zelikoff JT, editor. Ecotoxicology: Responses, biomarkers and risk assessment, an OECD workshop Chapter 32. Fair Haven (NY): SOS Publications. p 507–534. , , ,
- [NEPC] National Environmental Protection Council. 2011. National Environmental Protection Council Measures 2011—Guideline on Method to Derive Ecological Investigation Levels in Contaminated Soils, Schedule B5b. Canberra, Australia: National Environmental Protection Council.
- 2012. Effects assessment of molybdenum in the terrestrial environment. Final report for the International Molybdenum Association (IMOA). Leuven, Belgium: Arche.
- 2006. Soil properties affecting the of CuCl2 and NiCl2 for soil microbial processes in freshly spiked soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:836–844. , , ,
- 2012. Influence of geogenic factors on microbial communities in metallogenic Australian soils. ISME J 6:2107–2118. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2003. Effects of plant protection products on functional endpoints in soil. Pensacola (FL): Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. , , , , , , ,
- 2010. Stimulated activity of the soil nitrifying community accelerates community adaptation to Zn stress. Soil Biol Biochem 42:766–772. , , ,
- 2007. Soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for sub-Antarctic islands contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:890–897. , ,
- 2001. Potential nitrification rate as a tool for screening toxicity in metal-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2469–2474. , , ,
- 2003. Effects of field and laboratory Zn contamination on soil microbial processes and plant growth (final report of ILZRO project ZEH-SO-2), Laboratory of Soil and Water Management, Leuven University, Heverlee, Belgium, and CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia. , , , ,
- 2009. Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: Using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1633–1642. , , , , , ,
- 2011. Dealing with contaminated sites. From theory towards practical application. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. 1114 p.
- [UKEA] UK Environmental Agency. 2002. Review of sublethal ecotoxicological tests for measuring harm in terrestrial ecosystems. R&D Technical Report P5-063/TR1. Bristol (UK): UKEA. 192 p.
- [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Soil microbial community toxicity test. EPA 40 CFR Part 797.3700. Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines; Proposed rule. September 28, 1987.
- [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Attachment 1-2: Assessment of whether to develop ecological soil screening levels for microbes and microbial processes. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55. Washington DC: USEPA.
- [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55. Washington DC: USEPA
- [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Fate, transport and transformation test guidelines. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) 835.4100 October 2008. EPA 712-C-08-016.