SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS. 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:118.
  • Allison VJ, Yermakov Z, Miller RM, Jastrow JD, Matamala R. 2007. Using landscape and depth gradients to decouple the impact of correlated environmental variables on soil microbial community composition. Soil Biol Biochem 39:505516.
  • Banerjee S, Si BC, Siciliano SD. 2011. Evidence of high microbial abundance and spatial dependency in three arctic soil ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:22272232.
  • Bissett A, Brown MV, Siciliano SD, Thrall PH. 2013. Microbial community responses to anthropogenically induced environmental change: Towards a systems approach. Ecol Lett 16:128139.
  • Bissett A, Richardson AE, Baker G, Wakelin S, Thrall PH. 2010. Life history determines biogeographical patterns of soil bacterial communities over multiple spatial scales. Mol Ecol 19:43154327.
  • Broos K, Mertens J, Smolders E. 2005. Toxicity of heavy metals in soil assessed with various soil microbial and plant growth assays: As comparative study. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:634640.
  • Cairns J. 1986. The myth of the most sensitive species. Bioscience 36:670672.
  • Carlon CE. 2007. Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
  • Carson JK, Gonzalez-Quinones V, Murphy DV, Hinz C, Shaw JA, Gleeson DB. 2010. Low pore connectivity increases bacterial diversity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:39363942.
  • [CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2006. A protocol for the derivation of Environmental and Human Health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg, MB: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
  • Chapman PM. 1999. The role of soil microbial tests in ecological risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assessment 5:657660.
  • Checkai RT, Van Genderen E, Sousa JP, Stephenson G, Smolders E. Forthcoming. Deriving site-specific clean-up criteria to protect ecological receptors (plants and soil invertebrates) exposed to soil contaminants via the direct contact exposure pathway. Integr Environ Assess Manag.
  • [EC] European Commission. 2002. Guidance document on terrestrial ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev 2 final. [cited 2002 October 17]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/guidance/wrkdoc09_en.pdf
  • [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008a. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
  • [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
  • [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix R.7.13-2: Environmental risk assessment for metals and metal compounds. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency.
  • [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their residues (PPR) related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market-ecotoxicological studies. EFSA J 461:144.
  • Faber JH, van Wensem J. 2012. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils. Sci Total Environ 415:38.
  • Wentsel R, Fairbrother A. 2014. Next steps in the development of ecological soil clean-up values for metals. Integr Environ Assess Manag Available from: DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1451.
  • Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:626631.
  • Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA. 1991. Factors affecting L-asparaginase activity in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 11:15.
  • Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E. 1996. Changes in microbial community structure during long-term incubation in two soils experimentally contaminated with metals. Soil Biol Biochem 28:5563.
  • Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP. 2009. Heavy metals and soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:20312037.
  • Grayston SJ, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Clegg CD, Ritz K, Griffiths BS, Rodwell JS, Edwards SJ, Davies WJ, et al. 2004. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Appl Soil Ecol 25:6384.
  • Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sørensen SJ, Bååth E, Bloem J, De Ruiter PC, et al. 2000. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279294.
  • Harvey AN, Snape I, Siciliano SD. 2012. Validating potential toxicity assays to assess petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity in polar soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:402407.
  • Hull RN, Klee U, Bryant D, Copeland T. 1999. Soil microbial communities and ecological risk assessment: Risk assessors' perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:707714.
  • Jaensch S, Römbke J, Schallnass H-J, Terytze K. 2007. Derivation of soil values for the path “soil–soil organisms” for metals and selected organic compounds using species sensitivity distribution. Environ Sci Poll Res 14:308318.
  • Kapustka LA. 1999. Microbial endpoints: The rationale for their exclusion as ecological assessment endpoints. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:691696.
  • Kuczynski J, Liu ZZ, Lozupone C, McDonald D, Fierer N, Knight R. 2010. Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat Methods 7:813819.
  • Ma WK, Bedard-Haughn A, Siciliano SD, Farrell RE. 2008. Relationship between nitrifier and denitrifier community composition and abundance in predicting nitrous oxide emissions from ephemeral wetland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:11141123.
  • Ma WK, Schautz A, Fishback LAE, Bedard-Haughn A, Farrell RE, Siciliano SD. 2007. Assessing the potential of ammonia oxidizing bacteria to produce nitrous oxide in soils of a high arctic lowland ecosystem on Devon Island, Canada. Soil Biol Biochem 39:20012013.
  • Mertens J, Broos K, Wakelin SA, Kowalchuk GA, Springael D, Smolders E. 2009. Bacteria, not archaea, restore nitrification in a zinc-contaminated soil. ISME J 3:916923.
  • Mertens J, Ruyters S, Springael D, Smolders E. 2007. Resistance and resilience of zinc tolerant nitrifying communities is unaffected in long-term zinc contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:18281831.
  • Mertens J, Wakelin SA, Broos K, McLaughlin MJ, Smolders E. 2010. Extent of copper tolerance and consequences for functional stability of the ammonia-oxidizing community in long-term copper-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2737.
  • Nannipieri P, Badalucco L, Landi L, Pietramellara G. 1997. Measurement in assessing the risk of chemicals to the ecosystem. In: Zelikoff JT, editor. Ecotoxicology: Responses, biomarkers and risk assessment, an OECD workshop Chapter 32. Fair Haven (NY): SOS Publications. p 507534.
  • [NEPC] National Environmental Protection Council. 2011. National Environmental Protection Council Measures 2011—Guideline on Method to Derive Ecological Investigation Levels in Contaminated Soils, Schedule B5b. Canberra, Australia: National Environmental Protection Council.
  • Oorts K. 2012. Effects assessment of molybdenum in the terrestrial environment. Final report for the International Molybdenum Association (IMOA). Leuven, Belgium: Arche.
  • Oorts K, Ghesquiere U, Swinnen K, Smolders E. 2006. Soil properties affecting the of CuCl2 and NiCl2 for soil microbial processes in freshly spiked soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:836844.
  • Reith F, Brugger J, Zammit CM, Gregg AL, Goldfarb KC, Andersen GL, DeSantis TZ, Piceno YM, Brodie EL, Lu Z., et al. 2012. Influence of geogenic factors on microbial communities in metallogenic Australian soils. ISME J 6:21072118.
  • Römbke J, Heimbach F, Hoy S, Kula C, Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Sousa P, Stepenson G, Weeks J. 2003. Effects of plant protection products on functional endpoints in soil. Pensacola (FL): Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
  • Ruyters S, Mertens J, Springael D, Smolders E. 2010. Stimulated activity of the soil nitrifying community accelerates community adaptation to Zn stress. Soil Biol Biochem 42:766772.
  • Schafer AN, Snape I, Siciliano SD. 2007. Soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for sub-Antarctic islands contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:890897.
  • Smolders E, Brans K, Coppens F, Merckx R. 2001. Potential nitrification rate as a tool for screening toxicity in metal-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:24692474.
  • Smolders E, Buekers J, Waegeneers N, Oliver I, McLaughlin M. 2003. Effects of field and laboratory Zn contamination on soil microbial processes and plant growth (final report of ILZRO project ZEH-SO-2), Laboratory of Soil and Water Management, Leuven University, Heverlee, Belgium, and CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Smolders E, Oorts K, van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen CR, McGrath SP, McLaughlin MJ. 2009. Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: Using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:16331642.
  • Swartjes F. 2011. Dealing with contaminated sites. From theory towards practical application. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. 1114 p.
  • [UKEA] UK Environmental Agency. 2002. Review of sublethal ecotoxicological tests for measuring harm in terrestrial ecosystems. R&D Technical Report P5-063/TR1. Bristol (UK): UKEA. 192 p.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Soil microbial community toxicity test. EPA 40 CFR Part 797.3700. Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines; Proposed rule. September 28, 1987.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Attachment 1-2: Assessment of whether to develop ecological soil screening levels for microbes and microbial processes. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55. Washington DC: USEPA.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55. Washington DC: USEPA
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Fate, transport and transformation test guidelines. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) 835.4100 October 2008. EPA 712-C-08-016.