SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • [ADEC] Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. 2003. Alaska water quality criteria manual for toxic and other deleterious organic and inorganic substances. As amended through 15 May 2003. 51 p. Available from: http://www.dec.state.ak.us/water/wqsar/wqs/pdfs/70wqsmanual.pdf
  • [ANZECC/ARMCANZ] Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council/Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council/Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
  • Baldwin DH, Sandahl JF, Labenia JS, Scholz NL. 2003. Sublethal effects of copper on coho salmon: Impacts on nonoverlapping receptor pathways in the peripheral olfactory nervous system. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 22662274.
  • Baldwin DH, Tatara CP, Scholz NL. 2011. Copper-induced olfactory toxicity in salmon and steelhead: Extrapolation across species and rearing environments. Aquat Toxicol. 101: 295297.
  • [CTR] California Toxics Rule. 2000. Water quality standards; establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the state of California; rule. 40 CFR Part 131. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2000/May/Day-18/w11106.pdf
  • Di Toro DM, Allen HE, Bergman HL, Meyer JS, Paquin PR, Santore RC. 2001. Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. I. Technical basis. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 23832396.
  • [Ecology] Washington State Department of Ecology. 2006a. Zinc and copper concentrations in an industrial area creek during storm events. Publication No. 06-03-023. Available from: www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0603023.html
  • [Ecology] Washington State Department of Ecology. 2006b. Water quality standards for surface waters of the state of Washington. Chapter 173-201A WAC. Available from: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173-201A
  • Green WW, Mirza RS, Wood CM, Pyle GG. 2010. Copper binding dynamics and olfactory impairment in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Environ Sci Technol 44: 14311437.
  • Hansen JA, Rose JD, Jenkins RA, Gerow KG, Bergman HL. 1999. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to copper: Neurophysiological and histological effects on the olfactory system. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 19791991.
  • Hansen JA, Marr JCA, Lipton J, Cacela D, Bergman HL. 1999. Differences in neurobehavioral responses of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to copper and cobalt: Behavioral avoidance. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 19721978.
  • Hara TJ, Law YMC, Macdonald S. 1976. Effects of mercury and copper on the olfactory response in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. J Fish Res Board Can 33: 15681573.
  • HydroQual. 2007. The Biotic Ligand Model Windows Interface, Version 2.2.1: User's Guide and Reference Manual. HydroQual, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, February 2007. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/copper/2007/index.htm
  • [IDEQ] Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. 2009. Water quality standards. IDAPA 58.01.02. Available from: http://adm.idaho.gov/adminrules/rules/idapa58/0102.pdf
  • Linbo TL, Baldwin DH, McIntyre JK, Scholz NL. 2009. Effects of water hardness, alkalinity, and dissolved organic carbon on the toxicity of copper to the lateral line of developing fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 28: 14551461.
  • Markich SJ, Batley GE, Stauber JL, Rogers NJ, Apte SC, Hyne RV, Bowles KC, Wilde KL, Creighton NM. 2005. Hardness corrections for copper are inappropriate for protecting sensitive freshwater biota. Chemosphere 60: 18.
  • McIntyre JK, Baldwin DH, Meador JP, Scholz NL. 2008a. Chemosensory deprivation in juvenile coho salmon exposed to dissolved copper under varying water chemistry conditions. Environ Sci Technol 42: 13521358.
  • McIntyre JK, Baldwin DH, Meador JP, Scholz NL. 2008b. Additions and corrections: Chemosensory deprivation in juvenile coho salmon exposed to dissolved copper under varying water chemistry conditions. Environ Sci Technol 42: 67746775.
  • [MDEQ] Montana Department of Environmental Quality. 2008. Montana numeric water quality standards. Circular DEQ-7. Available from: http://www.deq.state.mt.us/wqinfo/standards/pdf/CompiledDEQ7.pdf
  • Meyer JS, Adams WJ. 2010. Relationship between biotic ligand model-based water quality criteria and avoidance and olfactory responses. Environ Toxicol Chem 29: 20962103.
  • [ODEQ] Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 2004. Water quality criteria summary. Available from: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/rules/div041/table20.pdf
  • Sandahl JF, Baldwin DH, Jenkins JJ, Scholz NL. 2007. A sensory system at the interface between urban stormwater runoff and salmon survival. Environ Sci Technol 41: 29983004.
  • Sandahl JF, Miyasaka G, Koide N, Ueda H. 2006. Olfactory inhibition and recovery in chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) following copper exposure. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63: 18401847.
  • Scherer E, McNicol RE. 1998. Preference-avoidance responses of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) to competing gradients of light and copper, lead, and zinc. Water Res 32: 924929.
  • Tierney KB, Baldwin DH, Hara TJ, Ross PS, Scholz NL, Kennedy CJ. 2010. Olfactory toxicity in fishes. Aquat Toxicol 96: 226.
  • Tipping E, Hurley M. 1992. A unifying model of cation binding by humic substances. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56: 36273641.
  • Tipping E. 1993. Modeling the competition between alkaline earth cations and trace metals species for binding by humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 27: 520529.
  • Tipping E. 1994. WHAM-A computer equilibrium model and computer code for waters, sediments, and soils incorporating a discrete site/electrostatic model of ion-binding by humic substances. Comput Geosci 20: 9731023.
  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1985a. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. NTIS No. PB85-227049. 98 p.
  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1985b. Ambient water quality criteria for copper - 1984. Washington, DC: Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 440/5-84-031.
  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics control. Washington, DC: Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 505/2-90-001.
  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. 1995 updates: Water quality criteria documents for the protection of aquatic life in ambient water. Washington, DC: Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-820-B-96-001.
  • [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Aquatic life ambient freshwater quality criteria - copper. Washington, DC: Office of Water and Office of Science and Technologies, US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-822-R-07-001.
  • Van Genderen E, Gensemer R, Smith C, Santore R, Ryan A. 2007. Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model relative to other site-specific criteria derivation methods for copper in surface waters with elevated hardness. Aquat Toxicol 84: 279291.