Invited Commentary
You have free access to this content
Effects of ionizing radiation on wildlife: What knowledge have we gained between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents?
Article first published online: 20 JUN 2011
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.238
Copyright © 2011 SETAC
Issue

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Special Issue: Challenges Posed by Radiation and Radionuclide Releases to the Environment
Volume 7, Issue 3, pages 371–373, July 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Beresford, N. A. and Copplestone, D. (2011), Effects of ionizing radiation on wildlife: What knowledge have we gained between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents?. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 7: 371–373. doi: 10.1002/ieam.238
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 20 JUN 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 23 MAY 2011 08:27AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 MAY 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 3 MAY 2011
- Manuscript Received: 11 APR 2011
REFERENCES
- , , , , , , . 2008. Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales. J Environ Radioact 99: 1430–1439.
- , , , , , , , , , . 2008. Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone – a test application of the ERICA Tool. J Environ Radioact 99: 1496–1502.
- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . 2000. Concentrations and dose rate estimates of 134,137cesium and 90strontium in small mammals at Chornobyl, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 305–312.
- , , . 2008. Effects of non-human species irradiation after the Chernobyl NPP accident. Environ Int 34: 880–897.
- , , , , , , , , , . 2010. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context – an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project. J Radiol Prot 30: 195–214.
- [IAEA] International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. Vienna (AT): IAEA. STI/PUB/1239.
- , , , . 2000. Genetic diversity of Clethrionomys glareolus populations from highly contaminated sites in the Chornobyl region, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 2130–2135.
- , . 2007. Species richness and abundance of forest birds in relation to radiation at Chernobyl. Biol Lett 3: 483–486.
- , . 2009. Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl 20 years after the accident. Biol Lett 5: 356–359.
- , . 2011. Efficiency of bio-indicators for low-level radiation under field conditions. Ecol Indicators 11: 424–430.
- , . 2011. Landscape portrait: a look at the impact of radioactive contaminants on Chernobyl's wildlife. Bull Atomic Scientists 67: 38–46.
- , . 2000. Frequencies of micronuclei in bank voles from zones of high radiation at Chornobyl, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 1644–1648.
- , . 2006. Transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl fallout. Radiat Environ Biophys 45: 167–177.
- , , , . 2005. Long-term development of the radionuclide exposure of murine rodent populations in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys 44: 169–181.
- . 2008. Is Chernobyl radiation really causing negative individual and population-level effects on barn swallows? Biol Lett 4: 63–64.
- , . 1982. Radioecology: nuclear energy and the environment. Volume II. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 228 p.
- , . 2011. Clarification and explanation of experimental design and mechanistic dose-response effects for significant radioecological impacts. Biol Lett 5: 356–359.

1551-3793/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=f3927167b091c84d51d45fbfb21043919822dc93)
1551-3793/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=046acc572bd7fc6893d0b88d876eb3ede9215f68)