SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Barnthouse LW. 2004. Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 23: 500508.
  • Brock TCM, Arts GHP, Maltby L, van den Brink PJ. 2006. Aquatic risks of pesticides, ecological protection goals, and common aims in European Union legislation. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2: e20e46.
  • Calow P, Sibly RM, Forbes V. 1997. Risk assessment on the basis of simplified life-history scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 19831989.
  • Casida JE, Quistad GB. 1998. Golden age of insecticide research: Past, present, or future? Annu Rev Entomol 43: 116.
  • Caswell H. 1996. Analysis of life table response experiments. 2. Alternative parameterizations for size- and stage-structured models. Ecol Model 88: 7382.
  • Caswell H. 2001. Matrix population models. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. 712 p.
  • Cavallini F. 1993. Fitting a Logistic Curve to Data. College Math J 24: 247253.
  • Cleveland CB, Bormett GA, Saunders DG, Powers FL, McGibbon AS, Reeves GL, Rutherford L, Balcer JL. 2002. Environmental fate of spinosad. 1. Dissipation and degradation in aqueous systems. J Agric Food Chem 50: 32443256.
  • Cleveland CB, Mayes MA, Cryer SA. 2002. An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton. Pest Manag Sci 58: 7084.
  • Cooper J, Dobson H. 2007. The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment. Crop Prot 26: 13371348.
  • Costanza R. 2006. Thinking broadly about costs and benefits in ecological management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2: 166173.
  • Crouse GD, Sparks TC, Schoonover J, Gifford J, Dripps J, Bruce T, Larson LL, Garlich J, Hatton C, Hill RL, Worden TV, Martynow JG. 2001. Recent advances in the chemistry of spinosyns. Pest Manag Sci 57: 177185.
  • Deardorff AD, Stark JD. 2009. Acute toxicity and hazard assessment of spinosad and R-11 to three cladoceran species and coho salmon. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82: 549553.
  • Duchet C, Larroque M, Caquet T, Franquet E, Lagneau C, Lagadic L. 2008. Effects of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis on a natural population of Daphnia pulex in field microcosms. Chemosphere 74: 7077.
  • [EC] European Commission. 2003. Technical guidance document in support of Commission Directive 93/67 EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) no. 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Chemical Bureau, Ispra, Italy.
  • Forbes VE, Calow P, Grimm V, Hayashi T, Jager T, Palmqvist A, Pastorok R, Salvito D, Sibly R, Spromberg J., et al. 2010. Integrating population modeling into ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 191193.
  • Forbes VE, Calow P, Sibly RM. 2008. The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 19871994.
  • Galic N, Hommen U, Boveco JM, van den Brink PJ. 2010. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals II: Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 338360.
  • Grimm V, Ashauer R, Forbes V, Hommen U, Preuss TG, Schmidt A, van den Brink PJ, Wogram J, Thorbek P. 2009. CREAM: a European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Environ Sci Polluti Res 16: 614617.
  • Hanson N. 2009. Population level effects of reduced fecundity in the fish species perch (Perca fluviatilis) and the implications for environmental monitoring. Ecol Model 220: 20512059.
  • Hanson N, Stark JD. 2011a. A comparison of simple and complex population models to reduce uncertainty in ecological risk assessments of chemicals: Example with three species of Daphnia. Ecotoxicology 20: 12681276.
  • Hanson N, Stark JD. 2011b. Extrapolation from individual level responses to population growth rate using population modeling. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 17: 13321347.
  • Hanson N, Åberg P, Sundelöf A. 2005. Population-level effects of male-biased broods in eelpout (Zoarces viviparus). Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 12351241.
  • Hommen U, Baveco J, Galic N, van den Brink PJ. 2010. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 325337.
  • Lampert W. 2006. Daphnia: Model herbivore, predator and prey. Polish J Ecol 54: 607620.
  • McLaughlin A, Mineau P. 1995. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 55: 201212.
  • [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Test No. 211: Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals/section 2: Effects on biotic systems. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A., et al. 2000. Biodiversity—Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 17701774.
  • [SANCO] Santé des Consommateurs. 2002. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. European Comission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, Belgium. Report No. SANCO/3268/2001.
  • [SANCO] Santé des Consommateurs. 2006. Review report on the active substance Spinosad. European Comission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, Belgium. Report No. SANCO/1428/2001.
  • Spromberg JA, Birge WJ. 2005. Modeling the effects of chronic toxicity on fish populations: The influence of life-history strategies. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 15321540.
  • Stark JD, Sugayama RL, Kovaleski A. 2007. Why demographic and modeling approaches should be adopted for estimating the effects of pesticides on biocontrol agents. Biocontrol 52: 365374.
  • Stark JD, Vargas RI. 2003. Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides spinosad and diazinon. Ecotox Environ Safe 56: 334338.
  • Suter G. 1993. Ecological risk assessment. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers. 538 p.
  • Tilman D. 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 59956000.
  • [USEPA] United States Unvironmental Protection Agency. 2004. Overview of the ecological risk assessment process in the office of pesticide programs. Washington DC: Office of Pesticide Programs. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/espp/consultation/ecorisk-overview.pdf