SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Apitz SE, Carlon C, Oen A, White S. Strategic frameworks for managing sediment risk at the basin and site-specific scale. In: HeiseS, editor. Sediment risk management and communication. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier (forthcoming).
  • Apitz SE, Davis JW, Finkelstein K, Hohreiter DL, Hoke R, Jensen RH, Kirtay VJ, Jersac J, Mack EE, Magar VM, Moore DW, Reible D, Stahl RS. 2005a. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: Part I, developing an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy. Integ Environ Assess Manag 1: 28.
  • Apitz SE, Davis JW, Finkelstein K, Hohreiter DL, Hoke R, Jensen RH, Kirtay VJ, Jersac J, Mack EE, Magar VM, Moore DW, Reible D, Stahl RS. 2005b. Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: Part II, evaluating risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness. Integ Environ Assess Manag 1: e1e14.
  • Apitz SE, Elliot M, Fountain M. European trends in holistic environmental management. Integ Environ Assess Manag (submitted).
  • Apitz SE, Power B. 2002. From risk assessment to sediment management: An international perspective. J Soils Sediments 2: 6166.
  • Apitz SE, White S. 2003. A conceptual framework for river-basin-scale sediment management. J Soils Sediments 3: 132138.
  • [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 1995. Standard guide for developing conceptual site models for contaminated sites. In: ASTM. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol 04.08. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM. E16891695.
  • Belton V, Stewart T. 2001. Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic.
  • Bergmann H, Maass V. Diversity of sediment regulations and monitoring programmes in Europe. In: HeiseS, editor. Sediment risk management and communication. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier (forthcoming).
  • Bridges TS, Berry W, Ells S, Ireland S, Maher E, Menzie C, Porebski L, Stronkhorst J, Dorn P. 2005. A risk-based assessment framework for contaminated sediments. In: WenningRJ, IngersollCG, BatleyGE, MooreDW, editors. Use of sediment quality guidelines and related tools for the assessment of contaminated sediments. Pensacola (FL): SETAC. p 227266.
  • Bridges T, Kiker G, Cura J, Apul D, Linkov I. 2005. Towards using comparative risk assessment to manage contaminated sediments. In: LevnerE, LinkovI, ProthJM, editors. Strategic management of marine ecosystems. Dordrecht (NL): Springer. p 261269.
  • Brils JM. 2003. The SedNet Strategy Paper: The opinion of SedNet on environmentally, socially and economically viable sediment management SedNet. http://www.sednet.org/materiale/SedNet_SP.pdf.
  • Brooke J. 2004a. The EU Water Framework Directive—a wake up call. In: 39th DEFRA Flood and Coastal Management Conference; 2004 June 29-July 1; York, UK. London (UK): Defra.
  • Brooke J. 2004b. The EU Water Framework Directive—one year on. In: Proceedings of the XVIIth World Dredging Congress, Environmental Day; 2004 Sept 29; Hamburg, Germany. Delft (NL): CEDA Secretariat.
  • Cura J, Bridges TS, McArdie M. 2004. Comparative risk assessment methods and their applicability to dredged material management decision-making. Int J Human Ecol Risk Assess 10: 485503.
  • den Besten PJ, de Deckere E, Babut MP, Power B, DelValls TA, Zago C, Oen AMP, Heise S. 2003. Biological effects-based sediment quality in ecological risk assessment for European waters. J Soils Sediments 3: 144162.
  • Gerrits L, Edelenbos J. 2004. Management of sediments through stakeholder involvement—The risks and value of engaging stakeholders when looking for solutions for sediment-related problems. J Soils Sediments 4: 239246.
  • Heise S, Apitz SE. The role of risk management and communication in sustainable sediment management. In: HeiseS, editor. Sediment risk management and communication. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier http://www.sednet.org/materiale/SedNet_SP.pdf (forthcoming).
  • Kane Driscoll SB, Wickwire WT, Cura JJ, Vorhees DJ, Butler CL, Moore DW, Bridges TS. 2002. A comparative screening-level ecological and human health risk assessment for dredged material management alternatives in New York/New Jersey Harbor. Int J Human Ecol Risk Assess 8: 603626.
  • Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Linkov I, Varghese A, Seager TP. 2005. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision-making. Integ Environ Assess Manag 1: 95108.
  • Köthe H. 2003. Existing sediment management guidelines: An overview. What will happen with the sediment/dredged material? J Soils Sediments 3: 139143.
  • Linkov I, Sahay S, Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Seager T. 2005. Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for managing contaminated sediments. In: LevnerE, LinkovI, ProthJM, editors. In strategic management of marine ecosystems. Dordrecht (NL): Springer. p 271297.
  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T. From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International (forthcoming).
  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Bridges TS, Benjamin S, Belluck D. 2006. From optimization to adaptation: Shifting paradigms in environmental management and their application to remedial decisions. Integ Environ Assess Manag 2: 9398.
  • Linkov I, Varghese A, Jamil S, Seager TP, Kiker G, Bridges TS. 2004. Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites. In: LinkovI, Bakr RamadanA, editors. Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision-making. Amsterdam (NL): Kluwer Academic. p 1554.
  • [NRC] National Research Council. 2001. A risk-management strategy for PCB contaminated sediments. Committee on Remediation of PCB-Contaminated Sediments, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Division on Life and Earth Studies, National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy.
  • [NRC] National Research Council, Marine Board, ommission of Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Contaminated Sediments. 1997. Contaminated sediments in ports and waterways: Cleanup strategies and technologies. Washington DC: National Academy.
  • Reible D, Hayes D, Lue-Hing C, Patterson J, Bhowmik N, Johnson M, Teal J. 2003. Comparison of the long-term risks of removal and in situ management of contaminated sediments in the Fox River. Soil Sediment Contamination 12: 325344.
  • Sorensen MT, Gala WR, Margolin JA. 2004. Approaches to ecological risk characterization and management: Selecting the right tools for the job. Int J Human Ecol Risk Assess 10: 245269.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. The incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States: Volume 1, National sediment quality survey. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-823-R-97–006.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Draft report on the incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States, national sediment quality survey. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-823-F-01–031.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Principles for managing contaminated sediment risks at hazardous waste sites. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER 9285.6–08.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. DRAFT. Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazardous waste sites. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
  • von Stackelberg K, Burmistrov D, Vorhees D, Bridges TS, Linkov I. 2002. Importance of uncertainty and variability to predicted risks from trophic transfer of PCBs in dredged sediments. Risk Analysis 22: 499512.
  • Vorhees DJ, Kane Driscoll SB, von Stackelberg K, Cura JJ, Bridges TS. 2002. An evaluation of sources of uncertainty in dredged material assessments. Int J Human Ecol Risk Assess 8: 369389.
  • Wenning RJ, Sorensen MT, Magar VM. 2006. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation. Integ Environ Assess Manag 2: 6066.