• Brock TCM, Arts GHP, Maltby L, Van den Brink PJ. In press. Aquatic risks of pesticides, ecological protection goals and common claims in EU Legislation. Integr Environ Assess Manag.
  • Campbell PJ, Arnold DJS, Brock TCM, Grandy NJ, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund SJ, Streloke M. 1999. HARAP guidance Document: Higher-tier Aquatic Risk Assessment for Pesticides. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC)-Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Crane M, Giddings J. 2004. “Ecologically Acceptable Concentrations” when assessing the environmental risks of pesticides under European Directive 91/414/EEC. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10: 733747.
  • Crane M, Norton A, Leaman J, Chalak A, Bailey A, Yoxon M, Smith J, Fenlon J. 2006. Acceptability of pesticide impacts on the environment: what do United Kingdom stakeholders and the public value? Pest Manag Sci 62: 519.
  • De Jong FMW, Mensink BJWG, Smit CE, Montforts MHMM. 2005. Evaluation of ecotoxicological field studies for authorization of plant protection products in Europe. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 11: 11571176.
  • De Jong FMW, Montforts MHMM. 2006. Workshop critical effect values for field studies with pesticides. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. SEC report 10308a00, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • EFSA. 2006. Opinion of the scientific panel on plant health, plant protection products and their residues on a request from the EFSA related to the aquatic risk assessment for cyprodinil and the use of a mesocosm study in particular. The EFSA journal 329: 177.
  • [EU] European Union. 1997. Council Directive 97/57/EC of September 21, 1997; Establishing annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC Concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Communities L265: 87109.
  • [EU] European Union. 2002. Guidance document on aquatic toxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. Working Document of the European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Brussels, Belgium.
  • Giddings JM, Brock TCM, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund SJ, Norman SM, Ratte HT, Schafers C, Streloke M. 2002. Community-Level Aquatic Systems Studies—Interpretation Criteria: CLASSIC. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, FL, USA.
  • Hanson ML, Sanderson H, Solomon KR. 2003. Variation, replication, and power analysis of Myriophyllum spp. Microcosm toxicity data. Environ Tox Chem 22: 13181329.
  • Hurlbert SH. 1975. Secondary effects of pesticides on aquatic ecosystems. Residue Reviews 57: 81148.
  • Liess M, Brown C, Dohmen P, Duquesne S, Hart A, Heimbach F, Kreuger J, Lagadic L, Maund S, Reinert W, Streloke M, Tarazona JV. 2005. Effects of pesticides in the field. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Brussels, Belgium.
  • Sanderson H. 2002. Pesticide studies. Replicability of micro/mesocosms. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 9: 429435.
  • Sanderson H, Petersen S. 2001. Power analysis as a reflexive scientific tool for interpretation and implementation of the precautionary principle in the European Union. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 8: 16.
  • Timmerman ME, Ter Braak CJF. 2006. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Principal Response Curves. Submitted.
  • Van den Brink PJ, Brown CD, Dubus IG. 2005. Using the expert model PERPEST to translate measured and predicted pesticide exposure data into ecological risks. Ecological Modelling 191: 106117.
  • Van Wijngaarden RPA. 2006. Interpretation and extrapolation of ecological responses in model ecosystems stressed with non-persistent insecticides. [PhD Thesis]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
  • Wogram J. 2005. Aquatic higher-tier tests in regulatory ecotoxicology—between easy way out and dead end. Platform presentation at the 5th ECOTOX Conference, 2005 Dec 8–9, Cologne, Germany.