SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aldenberg Tand Jaworska JS. 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46: 118.
  • Ankley GT, Schubauer‒Berigan MK, Dierkes JR. 1991. Predicting the toxicity of bulk sediments to aquatic organisms with aqueous test fractions: Pore water vs elutriate. Environ Toxicol Chem 10: 13591366.
  • [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 2000. Test method for measuring the toxicity of sediment‒associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM. E 170600.
  • Babut M, Perrodin Y 2001. Evaluation écotoxicologique de sediments contaminés ou de matériauxde dragage. (I) Présentation et justification de la démarche. Compiegne (FR): Voies Navigables de France (VNF), Centre d'Etudes Techniques Maritimes et Fluviales (CETMEF). p 43.
  • Babut M, Perrodin Y, Bedell JP, Clément B, Cosnier S, Corriger B, Delmas H, Delolme C, Devaux A, Miège C, Péry A, Roulier J‒L, Vollat B. 2004. Méthodologie d'évaluation écotoxicologique de matériauxde dragage: Tests de la démarche et essais d'optimisation. Compiegne (FR): CETMEF, VNF. p 100.
  • Babut M, Perrodin Y, Bray M, Clement B, Delolme C, Devaux A, Durrieu C, Garric J, Vollat B, Becart D, Charrier C. 2002. Evaluation des risques écologiques causés par des matériaux de dragage. Proposition d'une approche adaptée aux dépôts de gravière en eau. Rev Sci l'Eau 15: 615639.
  • Blanck H, Wallin G, Wangberg SA. 1984. Species‒dependant variation in algal sensitivity to chemical compounds. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 8: 339351.
  • Bonnet C. 2000. Développement de bioessais sur sédiments et applications a l'étude, en laboratoire, de la toxicité de sédiments dulçaquicoles contaminés, Université de Metz: 198 p. + annexes.
  • Boxall ABA, Fogg LA, Kay P, Blackwell PA, Pemberton EJ, Croxford A. 2003. Prioritisation of veterinary medicines in the UK environment. Toxicol Lett 142: 207218.
  • Burton GA, Chapman PM, Smith EP. 2002. Weight‒of‒evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 16571673.
  • Cairns J. 1983. Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental hazard. Hydrobiologia 100: 4757.
  • Cairns JJ. 1993. Environmental science and resource management in the 21st century: Scientific perspective. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 13211329.
  • Casado‒Martinez MC, Riba I, Blasco J, DelValls TA. 2005. Linking sediment chemical and biological guidelines for characterization of dredged material. J Environ Sci Health, A 40: 289303.
  • Chapman PM. 1995. Extrapolating laboratory toxicity results to the field. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 927930.
  • Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Hopkins WA, Rowe CL, Hinton TG. 2001. Resource allocation‒based life histories: A conceptual basis for studies of ecological toxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 16981703.
  • Costan G, Bermingham N, Blaise C, Ferard JF. 1995. Potential ecotoxic effects probe (PEEP): A novel index to assess and compare the toxic potential of industrial effluents. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 8: 115140.
  • Cullimore R. 1975. The in vitro sensitivity of some species of Chlorophyceae to a selected range of herbicides. Weed Res 15: 401406.
  • DelValls TA, Andres A, Belzunce MJ, Buceta J, Casado‒Martinez MC, Castro R, Riba I, Viguri JR, Blasco J. 2004. Chemical and ecotoxicological guidelines for managing disposal of dredged material. Trac‒Trends Anal Chem 23: 819828.
  • Den Besten PJ, De Deckere E, Babut M, Power B, DelValls TA, Zago C, Oen AMP, Heise S. 2003. Biological Effects‒based Sediment Quality in Ecological Risk Assessment for European Waters. J Soils Sediments 3: 144162.
  • Den Besten PJ, Schmidt CA, Ohm M, Ruys MM, van Berghem JW, van der Guchte C. 1995. Sediment quality assessment in the delta of rivers Rhine and Meuse based on field observations, bioassays and food chain implications. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 4: 257270.
  • DeWitt TH, Hickey CW, Morrisey DJ, Nipper MG, Roper DS, Williamson RB, Van Dam L, Williams EK. 1999. Do amphipods have the same concentration—Response to contaminated sediment in situ as in vitro? Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 10261037.
  • Dorioz JM, Pelletier JP, Benoit P. 1998. Proprietes physico‒chimiques et biodisponibilite potentielle du phosphore particulaire selon l'origine des sediments dans un bassin versant du Lac Leman (France) [Physico‒chemical properties and bioavailability of particulate phosphorus of various origin in a watershed of Lake Geneva (France)]. Water Res 32: 275286.
  • [ECB] European Chemicals Bureau. 2001. Draft revised technical guidance document on environmental effects assessment. Ispra (IT): ECB.
  • Giesy JP, Rosiu JL, Graney RL, Henry MG. 1990. Benthic invertebrate bioassays with toxic sediment and pore water. Environ Toxicol Chem 9: 233248.
  • Goldstein BD. 2003. Risk characterization and the Red Book. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 9: 12831289.
  • Gupta JP, Edwards DW. 2003. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety. J Hazard Mater 104: 1530.
  • Imbert T, Py C, Duchene M. 1998. Enlèvement des sédiments—Guide méthodologique—Faut‒il curer? Pour une aide à la prise de décision. Douai, FRA: Pôle de compétence sur les sites et sols pollués Nord‒Pas de Calais‒Agence de l'Eau Artois‒Picardie.
  • Ingersoll CG, McDonald DD, Brumbaugh WG, Johnson BT, Kemble NE, Kunz JL, May TW, Wang N, Smith JR, Sparks DW, Ireland DS. 2002. Toxicity assessment of Sediments from the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Canal in northwestern Indiana, USA. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 43: 156167.
  • Isnard P. 1998. Assessing the environmental impact of wastewaters. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 40: 8893.
  • Isnard P, Flammarion P, Roman G, Babut M, Bastien P, Bintein S, Esserméant L, Férard JF, Gallotti‒Schmitt S, Saouter E, Saroli M, Thiébaud H, Tomassone R, Vindimian E. 2001. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicology tests. Chemosphere 45: 659669.
  • Johnston RK, Munns WR, Tyler PL, Marajh‒Whittemore P, Finkelstein K, Munney K, Short FT, Melville A, Hahn SP. 2002. Weighing the evidence of ecological risk from chemical contamination in the estuarine environment adjacent to the Portsmouth naval shipyard, Kittery, Maine, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 182194.
  • Jouany JM, Vaillant M, Blarez B, Cabridenc R, Ducloux R, Schmitt S. 1982. Approach to hazard assessment by a qualitative system based on interaction concepts between variables. In: Chemicals in the environment; 18–20 October 1982. Lingby‒Copenhague (DK). p 367387.
  • Kelly EJ, Campbell K. 2000. Separating variability and uncertainty in environmental risk assessment—Making choices. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 6: 113.
  • Kemble NE, Brumbaugh WG, Brunson EL, Dwyer FJ, Ingersoll CG, Monda DP, Woodward DF. 1994. Toxicity of metal‒contaminated sediments from the upper Clark Fork River, Montana, to aquatic invertebrates and fish in laboratory exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 13: 19851997.
  • Kimball KD, Levin SA. 1985. Limitations of laboratory bioassays: The need for ecosystem‒level testing. Bioscience 35: 165171.
  • Lewis MA. 1995. Use of freshwater plants for phytotoxicity testing. A review. Environ Pollut 87: 319336.
  • Long ER, McDonald DD, Smith SL, Calder FD. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ Manag 19: 8197.
  • MacDonald DD, Carr RS, Calder FD, Long ER, Ingersoll CG. 1996. Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253278.
  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA. 2000. Development and evaluation of consensus‒based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 39: 2031.
  • [MATE] MdlAdTed l'Environnement. 1997. Critères et méthodes d'évaluation de l'écotoxicité des déchets. Paris (FR): MATE. p 35.
  • [MATE] MdlAdTed l'Environnement. 2002. Décret 2002–540 du 18 avril 2002 relatif à la classification des déchets—NOR: ATEP0190045D. Paris (FR): MATE. 2002. p 7074.
  • McDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Smorong DE, Lindskoog RA, Sparks DW, Smith JR, Simon TP, Hanacek MA. 2002. Assessment of injury to fish and wildlife resources in the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Area of Concern, USA. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 43: 130140.
  • Menzie C, Henning MH, Cura J, Finkelstein K, Gentile J, Maughan J, Mitchell D, Petron S, Potocki B, Svirski S, Tyler P. 1996. Special report of the Massachussetts Weight‒of‒Evidence Workgroup: A weight‒of‒evidence approach for evaluating ecological risks. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 2: 277304.
  • Mitchell RR, Summer CL, Blonde SA, Bush DM, Hurlburt GK, Snyder EM, Giesy JP. 2002. SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes—Resulting chemical scores and rankings. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 537557.
  • Nebeker AV, Cairns MA, Gakstetter JH, Malueg KW, Schuytema GS, Krawczyck DF. 1984. Biological methods for determining toxicity of contaminated freshwater sediments to invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 3: 617630.
  • [NRC] National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the Federal government: Managing the process. Washington (DC): National Research Council/National Academies.
  • Nyholm N, Lyngby JE. 1988. Algal bioassays in eutrophication research—A discussion in the framework of a mathematical analysis. Water Res 22: 12931300.
  • Oudin LC, Maupas D. 2003. Système d'évaluation de la Qualité des Cours d'eau‒Rapport de présentation (version 2). Paris (FR): Ministère de l'Ecologie et du Développement Durable, Agences de l'eau. p 106.
  • Padovani L, Trevisan M, Capri E. 2004. A calculation procedure to assess potential environmental risk of pesticides at the farm level. Ecol Indic 4: 111123.
  • Péry ARR, Ducrot V, Mons R, Miège C, Gahou J, Gorini D, Garric J. 2003. Survival tests with Chironomus riparius exposed to spiked sediments can profit from DEBtox model. Water Res 37: 26912699.
  • Péry ARR, Mons R, Flammarion P, Lagadic L, Garric J. 2002. A modeling approach to link food availability, growth, emergence, and reproduction for the midge Chironomus riparius. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 25072513.
  • Phipps GL, Mattson VR, Ankley GT. 1995. Relative sensitivity of three freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates to ten contaminants. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 28: 281286.
  • Rasmussen JB. 1984. The life‒history, distribution, and production of Chironomus riparius and Glyptotendipes paripes in a prairie pond. Hydrobiologia 119: 6572.
  • Sanchez‒Bayo F, Baskaran S, Kennedy IR. 2002. Ecological relative risk (EcoRR): another approach for risk assessment of pesticides in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91: 3757.
  • Smith SL, McDonald DD, Keenleyside KA, Gaudet CL. 1996. The development and implementation of Canadian sediment quality guidelines. In: MunawarM, DaveG, editors. Ecovision World Monograph Series—Development and progress in sediment quality assessment: Rationale, challenges, techniques & strategies. Amsterdam (NL): SPB Academic. p 233249.
  • Snell TW, Carmona MJ. 1995. Comparative toxicant sensitivity of sexual and asexual reproduction in the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 415420.
  • Snell TW, Moffat BD. 1992. A 2‒D life cycle test with the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Environ Toxicol Chem 11: 12491257.
  • Spugnoli P, Vieri M. 1998. Operational risk assessment of sprayers by environmental impact analysis. J Agric Eng Res 71: 405414.
  • Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio‒Polatera P. 2000. Invertébrés d'eau douce—Systématique, biologie, écologie. Paris (FR): CNRS. p 588. Underwood AJ. 1995. Toxicological testing in laboratories is not ecological testing of toxicology. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 1: 178182.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Washington DC: USEPA. EPA‒630/R‒95/002F.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Evaluation of toxicity and bioaccumulation of contaminants in sediments samples from Waukegan Harbor, Illinois. Chicago (IL): USEPA. EPA‒905‒R‒99–009.
  • Vaillant M, Jouany JM, Devillers J. 1995. A multicriteria estimation of the environmental risk of chemicals with the SIRIS method. Toxicol Model 1: 5772.
  • Vindimian E, Garric J, Flammarion P, Thybaud E, Babut M. 1999. An index of effluent aquatic toxicity designed by partial least squares regression, using acute and chronic tests and expert judgements. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 23862391.
  • Wang FY, Goulet RR, Chapman PM. 2004. Testing sediment biological effects with the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca: The gap between laboratory and nature. Chemosphere 57: 17131724.
  • Ward JV. 1992. Aquatic insect ecology—1. Biology and habitat. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons. 438 p.
  • West CW, Mattson VR, Leonard EN, Phipps GL., Ankley GT. 1993. Comparison of relative sensitivity of three benthic invertebrates to copper contaminated sediment from Keweenaw waterways. Hydrobiologia 262: 5763.
  • Wildhaber ML, Schmitt CJ. 1996. Hazard ranking of contaminated sediments based on chemical analysis, laboratory toxicity tests, and benthic community composition: Prioritizing sites for remedial action. J Great Lakes Res 22: 639652.