Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Copyright © 2013 SETAC

Cover image for Vol. 6 Issue 4

October 2010

Volume 6, Issue 4

Pages 615–404

  1. Editorial

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Bridging science, management and responses to environmental disasters (pages 615–616)

      Richard J Wenning

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.130

  2. Letter to the Editor

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Brief summary of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) advanced research workshop on global climate change and local adaptation (pages 617–618)

      Igor Linkov, Todd S Bridges, Ahmed Hady, Ingibjörg Jónsdóttir, Greg Kiker, James Lambert, Marvin MacBride, José Manuel Palma-Oliveira, Nicola Ranger, Edmond Russo and Alberto Troccoli

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.127

  3. Review—Global Environmental Issue

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging (pages 619–630)

      Todd S Bridges, Karl E Gustavson, Paul Schroeder, Stephen J Ells, Donald Hayes, Steven C Nadeau, Michael R Palermo and Clay Patmont

      Article first published online: 22 MAR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.71

  4. Original Research

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Risk-based analysis of polychlorinated biphenyl toxicity in harbor seals (pages 631–640)

      Lizzy Mos, Marc Cameron, Steven J Jeffries, Ben F Koop and Peter S Ross

      Article first published online: 16 JUN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.104

    2. Estimating sediment quality thresholds to prevent restrictions on fish consumption: Application to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins–furans in the Canadian Great Lakes (pages 641–652)

      Satyendra P Bhavsar, Sarah B Gewurtz, Paul A Helm, Tanya L Labencki, Christopher H Marvin, Rachael Fletcher, Alan Hayton, Eric J Reiner and Duncan Boyd

      Article first published online: 3 JUN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.102

    3. Environmental effect assessment for sexual endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Fish testing strategy (pages 653–662)

      Thomas Knacker, Melanie Boettcher, Tobias Frische, Hans Rufli, Hans-Christian Stolzenberg, Matthias Teigeler, Sabine Zok, Thomas Braunbeck and Christoph Schäfers

      Article first published online: 23 APR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.92

    4. Aquatic hazard assessment for pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine-disrupting compounds from biosolids-amended land (pages 663–676)

      KA Langdon, MStJ Warne and RS Kookana

      Article first published online: 26 MAR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.74

    5. Improving emissions estimates of home and personal care products ingredients for use in EU risk assessments (pages 677–684)

      Oliver R Price, Gregory O Hughes, Nicola L Roche and Paul J Mason

      Article first published online: 23 APR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.88

    6. A methodology for ecosystem-scale modeling of selenium (pages 685–710)

      Theresa S Presser and Samuel N Luoma

      Article first published online: 3 JUN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.101

    7. Incorporating linguistic, probabilistic, and possibilistic information in a risk-based approach for ranking contaminated sites (pages 711–724)

      Kejiang Zhang, Gopal Achari and Yuansheng Pei

      Article first published online: 12 MAR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.72

    8. Phytotoxicity assay for seed production using Brassica rapa L. (pages 725–734)

      David Olszyk, Thomas Pfleeger, E. Henry Lee and Milton Plocher

      Article first published online: 1 MAY 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.89

  5. Case Studies

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Meeting the challenge of identifying persistent pollutants at the state level (pages 735–748)

      Bruce K Hope, David Stone, Taku Fuji, Robert W Gensemer and Jeffrey Jenkins

      Article first published online: 29 APR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.94

    2. Review of thin-layer placement applications to enhance natural recovery of contaminated sediment (pages 749–760)

      Karen A Merritt, Jason Conder, Victoria Kirtay, D Bart Chadwick and Victor Magar

      Article first published online: 12 APR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.76

    3. Toxicity profiling: An integrated effect-based tool for site-specific sediment quality assessment (pages 761–773)

      Timo Hamers, Pim EG Leonards, Juliette Legler, A Dick Vethaak and Cor A Schipper

      Article first published online: 5 APR 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.75

  6. Debate and Commentary

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Revisiting the rationale for holistic, integrated risk assessments (pages 774–776)

      Larry Kapustka, Ken Froese and Ron McCormick

      Article first published online: 8 JUL 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.107

  7. Learned Discourses

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Learned discourses: Timely scientific opinions (page 777)

      Peter M. Chapman

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.131

    2. Why does earthworm mucus decrease metal mobility? (pages 777–779)

      Tom Sizmur, Barbara Palumbo-Roe and Mark E Hodson

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.124

    3. Habitats: Can they stress birds? An example of the use of biomarkers as an evaluation tool (pages 779–780)

      Nuno G C Ferreira, Luis Pascoal da Silva, Carlos Fonseca, Amadeu M V M Soares and Susana Loureiro

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.113

    4. Inclusion of economic mechanisms into life cycle analysis: Start with “framing the question” (pages 780–782)

      Alessandra Zamagni

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.112

    5. Strategies to improve chemical-related risk communication in Canada (pages 782–783)

      M C Croteau, D Bédard and D Krewski

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.115

    6. Communicating the processes of science to the news media, politicians, and the public (pages 783–784)

      John Cairns Jr.

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.114

    7. Ecological risk assessment should be value-relevant but not value-biased (pages 784–785)

      Peter Calow and Valery Forbes

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.117

  8. Book Reviews

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. Book reviews (pages 786–789)

      Glenn Suter

      Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.125

  9. Errata

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Letter to the Editor
    4. Review—Global Environmental Issue
    5. Original Research
    6. Case Studies
    7. Debate and Commentary
    8. Learned Discourses
    9. Book Reviews
    10. Errata
    1. You have free access to this content
      Erratum: Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study (page 790)

      Markus Liebig, Álvaro Alonso Fernandez, Elke Blübaum-Gronau, Alistair Boxall, Marvin Brinke, Gregoria Carbonell, Philipp Egeler, Kathrin Fenner, Carlos Fernandez, Guido Fink, Jeanne Garric, Bent Halling-Sørensen, Thomas Knacker, Kristine A Krogh, Anette Küster, Dirk Löffler, Miguel Ángel Porcel Cots, Louise Pope, Carsten Prasse, Jörg Römbke, Ines Rönnefahrt, Manuel K. Schneider, Natascha Schweitzer, José V Tarazona, Thomas A Ternes, Walter Traunspurger, Anne Wehrhan and Karen Duis

      Article first published online: 9 JUL 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.110

      This article corrects:

      Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study

      Vol. 6, Issue S1, 567–587, Article first published online: 23 APR 2010

    2. You have free access to this content
      Erratum: Probabilistic application of a fugacity model to predict triclosan fate during wastewater treatment (pages 393–404)

      Michael Bock, Jennifer Lyndall, Timothy Barber, Phyllis Fuchsman, Elyse Perruchon and Marie Capdevielle

      Article first published online: 24 AUG 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ieam.134

      This article corrects:

      Probabilistic application of a fugacity model to predict triclosan fate during wastewater treatment

      Vol. 6, Issue 3, 393–404, Article first published online: 1 FEB 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION