Tumor targeting properties of monoclonal antibodies with different affinity for target antigen CD44V6 in nude mice bearing head-and-neck cancer xenografts

Authors


Abstract

The CD44 protein family consists of isoforms with tissue-specific expression, which are encoded by standard exons and up to 9 alternatively spliced variant exons (v2–v10) of the same gene. The murine MAbs U36 and BIWA-1, directed against overlapping epitopes within the v6 region of CD44, have previously been shown to efficiently target HNSCC. We herein report on the construction of 1 chimeric (BIWA-2) and 2 humanized (BIWA-4 and BIWA-8) derivatives of BIWA-1. Together with U36 and BIWA-1, these new antibodies were evaluated for affinity to the antigen in vitro as well as for biodistribution and efficacy in RIT using nude mice bearing the HNSCC xenograft line HNX-OE. As determined by surface plasmon resonance, the MAbs bound to CD44v6 with an up to 46-fold difference in affinity (Kd ranging from 1.1 × 10−8 to 2.4 × 10−10 M) with the following ranking: mMAb U36 < hMAb BIWA-4 < hMAb BIWA-8 < mMAb BIWA-1 ∼ cMAb BIWA-2. To evaluate their in vivo tumor-targeting properties, 2 MAbs with identical murine or human isotype were labeled with either 131I or 125I and administered simultaneously (50 μg/10 μCi each) as pairs showing a stepwise decrease in the difference in affinity: U36 vs. BIWA-1 (35.0-fold difference), BIWA-4 vs. BIWA-2 (14.0-fold) and BIWA-4 vs. BIWA-8 (4.0-fold). Biodistribution was assessed at 1, 2, 3 or 4 and 7 days after injection. Remarkably, for all 3 MAb pairs tested, the lower-affinity MAb showed a higher degree and specificity of tumor localization. The difference in tumor localization was more pronounced when the difference in affinity was larger. For example, 3 days after injection, the lower-affinity mMAb U36 showed a 50% higher tumor uptake than the higher-affinity mMAb BIWA-1, while blood levels and uptake in organs were similar. After labeling with 186Re (300 or 400 μCi), the same MAb pairs showed RIT efficacy consistent with the biodistribution data: 186Re-U36 was more effective than 186Re-BIWA-1, 186Re-BIWA-4 was slightly more effective than 186Re-BIWA-2 and 186Re-BIWA-4 and 186Re-BIWA-8 demonstrated similar efficacy. Based on these data, we conclude that antibodies with markedly lower affinity to a given target antigen (e.g., U36, BIWA-4) may show superior tumor targeting in comparison with higher-affinity versions of these antibodies. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ancillary