Fax: +011886-7-3221806
Epidemiology
Independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer in Taiwan
Article first published online: 28 SEP 2004
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20619
Copyright © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Lee, C.-H., Lee, J.-M., Wu, D.-C., Hsu, H.-K., Kao, E.-L., Huang, H.-L., Wang, T.-N., Huang, M.-C. and Wu, M.-T. (2005), Independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer in Taiwan. Int. J. Cancer, 113: 475–482. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20619
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 NOV 2004
- Article first published online: 28 SEP 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 JUL 2004
- Manuscript Received: 29 APR 2004
Funded by
- Taiwan National Science Council. Grant Numbers: NSC 90-2320-B-037-040, NSC 90-2320-B-037-052
- Taiwan National Health Research Institute. Grant Number: NHRI-CN-IN-9007P
- Faculty Research Innovation Fund of Kaohsiung Medical University
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- esophageal neoplasms;
- alcohol drinking;
- smoking;
- areca;
- risk factors
Abstract
A multicenter case-control study was conducted in northern and southern Taiwan to clarify the independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer. A total of 513 patients with newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and 818 gender, age and study hospital-matched controls were included. We found a significant dose-response relationship between the duration and intensity of consumption of the 3 substances and the development of this neoplasm in this site. Although the amount of alcohol consumed had a stronger effect on the risk of esophageal cancer than the number of years it was consumed, however, the number of years one smoked had a stronger effect on the risk than the amount of cigarettes consumed. The strongest risk factor of esophageal cancer was alcohol intake, with highest risk (OR = 13.9) being for those who consumed more than 900 g/day-year. Combined exposure to any 2 of 3 substances brought the risks up to 8.8–19.7 fold and, to all 3 substances, to 41.2-fold. A multiplicative interaction effect for alcohol drinkers who smoked on cancer risk was detected, whereas an additive interaction effect was found among drinkers who chewed. The combined effect of all 3 substances accounted for 83.7% of the attributable fraction of contracting esophageal cancer in this population. In conclusion, these results suggest that the intensity and the length of time alcohol and tobacco are used play different roles in the etiology of esophageal cancer. Alcohol separately interacts with tobacco and betel quid in a differently synergistic way in determining the development of this site of cancer.

1097-0215/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=45719cd7de57873027993264fcc568b335a8cd56)
1097-0215/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=5e0fba63c1309b3036eb9215a0e1e83dd02efd19)
