Early Detection and Diagnosis
New immunochemical fecal occult blood test with two-consecutive stool sample testing is a cost-effective approach for colon cancer screening: Results of a prospective multicenter study in Chinese patients
Article first published online: 19 JAN 2006
Copyright © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
International Journal of Cancer
Volume 118, Issue 12, pages 3078–3083, 15 June 2006
How to Cite
Li, S., Wang, H., Hu, J., Li, N., Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Zheng, Y., Wang, H., Wu, K., Ye, H. and Rao, J. (2006), New immunochemical fecal occult blood test with two-consecutive stool sample testing is a cost-effective approach for colon cancer screening: Results of a prospective multicenter study in Chinese patients. Int. J. Cancer, 118: 3078–3083. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21774
- Issue published online: 27 MAR 2006
- Article first published online: 19 JAN 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 NOV 2005
- Manuscript Received: 24 JUN 2005
- colon cancer;
- fecal occult blood test;
The purpose of the study is to evaluate a new immunochemical fecal occult blood test method (Hemosure IFOBT), and compare it to the Guaiac-based chemical method (CFOBT) for colorectal cancer detection. A hypothetical sequential method (SFOBT), in which IFOBT was used only as a confirmatory test for CFOBT, was also evaluated. A total of 324 patients were recruited from 5 major hospitals in Beijing, China. For each patient, 3 consecutive stool samples were collected for simultaneous CFOBT and IFOBT tests, followed by colonoscopic examination. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the 3 methods (CFOBT, IFOBT and SFOBT) in two settings, with the first 2 consecutive samples versus all 3 samples. Although the sensitivity for the detection of cancer and large (>20 mm) or multiple adenoma was similar for all 3 methods in the three-sample setting, in the two-sample setting IFOBT had higher sensitivity than SFOBT for detecting cancer (87.8% vs. 75.5%, respectively, p < 0.05) and large (>20 mm) or multiple adenomas (65.4% vs. 42.3%, respectively, p < 0.05). The IFOBT also had a higher specificity than the CFOBT (89.2% vs. 75.5%, respectively, p < 0.01) in “normal” individuals defined by colonoscopy in the three-sample setting. Comparing two-sample setting to the three-sample setting, both CFOBT and SFOBT showed significant loss of sensitivity for the detection of cancer as well as adenoma, whereas the sensitivity for IFOBT did not change significantly. Overall, IFOBT with two-sample testing showed compatible sensitivity and specificity to the three-sample testing, and had a lower relative cost per cancer detected than the three-sample testing. In conclusion, the new Hemosure IFOBT with two consecutive stool samples appears to be the most cost-effective approach for colon cancer screening. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.