• RCC;
  • PD-L1;
  • PD-1;
  • B7-H1;
  • melanoma


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Human tumors frequently escape immune destruction, despite the presence of cyototoxic T cells (CTL) recognizing tumor-associated antigens (TAA). We have previously shown that programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), a recently identified ligand of the B7 superfamily, is expressed on murine tumors and can inhibit antitumor immune responses. To evaluate the clinical relevance of our animal model findings, we examined human tumors and tumor-specific T cells. We found PD-L1 to be constitutively expressed on human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines and upregulated on human melanoma cell lines upon exposure to interferon-gamma. Similarly, we found binding of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) on frozen sections from RCC and melanomas, but not on normal tissues. The corresponding inhibitory receptor of PD-L1, PD-1, revealed a higher expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes than on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from melanoma patients upon specific antigen stimulation. Stimulation of PBL from healthy donors with peptide-loaded dendritic cells in the presence of anti-PD-L1 mAb altered neither the total T cell numbers after expansion, nor the percentage of peptide-specific CTL, when providing a T cell help by addition of cytokines. However, when stimulating TAA-specific CTL and T helper cells with Ag-pulsed dendritic cells in the absence of exogenous cytokines, PD-L1 blockade increased the cytokine production. Similar to the data achieved in the murine system, the blockade of PD-L1 on human tumors resulted in enhanced cytolytic activity of TAA-specific CTLs and cytokine production of TAA-specific T helper cells when interacting directly with the tumor. In summary, our data suggest that PD-L1/PD-1 interactions negatively regulate T cell effector functions predominately in the absence of exogenous cytokine support, indicating an important role for this pathway in tumor evasion. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Although the prognosis for patients with advanced solid tumors still remains poor,1 a number of promising approaches, such as cancer immunotherapy, have been developed over the past decade. However, it is still an unsolved question why existing tumor-specific T cells in cancer patients fail to effectively prevent tumor progression. Inefficient T cell stimulation, either due to the absence of efficient antigen-presentation and costimulation or due to the presence of coinhibitory molecules, may contribute to this phenomenon.

Data from animal models showing that CD8+ T cells can lead to regression and rejection of solid tumors, and metastases2 were reproduced with human cancer patients in clinical studies only partially.3, 4, 5, 6 Despite the fact that tumor-specific T cells can be expanded and transferred effectively and thus survive and localize into tumors,7, 8 tumor growth is not always controlled.

It appears that the microenvironment of cancers protects tumor cells from immune destruction.9, 10 Increasing appreciation of costimulation (via CD28 or ICOS) and coinhibition (via CTLA-4 or PD-1) in the modulation of T cell responses11, 12, 13 resulted in the development of new strategies for cancer immunotherapy.10, 14, 15 The concept that blockade of coinhibitory signals can overcome resistance has generated hope that manipulating second signals may lead to enhanced antitumor immune responses. CTLA-4 blockade, for example, has been demonstrated to improve antitumor responses in several experimental cancer models,16, 17 but failed as a single agent in the treatment of poorly immunogenic tumors,18, 19 perhaps because of the common absence of its ligands B7-1 and B7-2 on tumor cells themselves.

Recently, we and others demonstrated a mechanism by which tumors can evade immune destruction, the expression of programmed death ligand (PD-L1) (B7-H1) on tumor cells.20, 21, 22 PD-L1 (B7-H1) is a B7-family member that has been described to negatively regulate T cell functions by engagement with PD-1, a CD28 family member receptor.23, 24, 25, 26 PD-1 is upregulated on activated T cells and B cells.27, 28, 29 Several groups have shown that coligation of PD-1 negatively regulates cytokine production and proliferation of T cells.23, 24, 25, 26 Other groups have postulated a costimulatory effect of PD-L1, possibly mediated via an unidentified receptor different from PD-130, 31, 32, 33 or via modulation of the PD-1-signal at the immunoreceptor tyrosine switch motif (ITSM).34 However, studies using PD-1 deficient (–/–) mice revealed different types of autoimmune diseases, such as cardiomyopathy, lupus-like arthritis or glomerulonephritis, supporting its immune-inhibitory function.35, 36 In addition, PD-1 deficiency enhanced antiviral immunity.37, 38

The strong and widespread expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells led to the hypothesis of PD-L1/PD-1 interaction mediating tumor evasion. Indeed, Thompson et al. described a correlation between PD-L1 expression on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clinical cancer progression.39 In addition, poor prognosis of esophageal cancer patients has been shown to correlate with PD-L1 expression.40 Animal models revealed an improved tumor rejection from PD-1 deficient tumor-specific T cells20, 22 and decreased spread of poorly immunogenic melanoma and colon carcinoma cells in PD-1 deficient animals.41 Furthermore, PD-L1 was shown to be expressed at high levels on human glioma cells, and its blockade was shown to increase T cell function upon polyclonal stimulation.42 In addition, PD-L1 was found to be expressed at increased levels on murine monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) collected from cancer tissues.43

On the basis of these data, we addressed in the current study whether PD-L1 blockade could augment T cell responses against human cancers, and at which steps of immunotherapy protocols against human cancers PD-L1-blockade could be beneficial. We found PD-L1 to be expressed after interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) treatment on human melanoma cell lines and constitutively expressed on RCC lines. In situ, we detected PD-L1 on some melanoma metastases and in RCC tumors, but not on nevi or other normal tissues. In addition, higher levels of PD-1 receptor density were observed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) as compared to that on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), obtained from melanoma patients. Using PD-L1 blocking monoclonal antibodies, the cytokine production and expansion of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells was not altered when stimulating with peptide-loaded DCs in presence of T-cell growth factors. However, effector function of even optimized tumor antigen-specific T-cell receptor transgeneic (TCRtg) cytolytic and helper T cells44 was impaired by PD-L1 expressing human tumor cells and improved by the inhibition of PDL-1/PD-1 interactions. Furthermore, we found immune functions of these TCRtg T cells to be improved when interacting with peptide-loaded DCs, even if the costimulatory signal via CD80 was blocked. We conclude that PD-L1 blockade predominantely improves the immune function at the effector phase of human tumor-specific T cells in the absence of exogenous cytokine support.

Material and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Human tumors

Tumor material from RCC and melanoma patients was provided by the tumor banks of the University of Regensburg. The study was approved by the University of Regensburg institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients' data can be found in the supplemental Table.

Antibodies and reagents

The following antibodies were used: sterile antihuman PD-L1 (clone 5-496 or DF27226; both antibodies show similar reaction patterns, and cross blocking clearly revealed that they bind to the same epitope (not published)), anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (clone 5H1, provided by Lieping Chen, Mayo Medical School, Rochester), anti-PD-L1-biotin (eBioscience, San Diego), anti-HLA-A2 (Serotec, Düsseldorf, Germany), anti-CD8-FITC (Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany), anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (Becton Dickenson, San Jose). Isotype controls were sterile mouse IgG (Sigma–Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), mouse IgG-biotin (eBioscience, San Diego) and mouse-IgG-FITC (Becton Dickinson, San Jose). In addition, StreptAvidin-PE (Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany) and Melan-A-tetramer (Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) were used. Capture/detector antibody pairs for use in ELISA were purchased from the following companies: TNF-α (R&D Systems), IL-2 (R&D Systems), IL-4 (Endogen) and IL-12p70 (Endogen). Recombinant human IFN-γ was obtained from Promokine, Heidelberg, Germany.

Cell culture

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte line TIL067, peripheral blood lymphocyte line PBL067 and human melanoma line MeR190 were obtained from 1 patient, as described before.45 TIL and PBL were cultured in RPMI, supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 40 U/ml penicillin + 40 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco), 1 mM sodium-pyruvate (PAN), 1× non-essential amino acids (PAN), 1× MEM vitamines (PAN, Aidenbach, Germany), 50 μM 2-Mercato-Ethanol (ME) and 10% pooled AB human serum (PAN). The human melanoma cell lines Me275, Mel493, Mel108, MelImSi, Na8 and MeR190 have been described before,8, 46 and were cultured in supplemented RPMI plus 10% FCS. Cocultures of tumor cell lines and lymphocytes were performed in cell culture medium containing human serum. The RCC cell line MZ1851RC was kindly provided by Alexander Knuth, Zuerich, Switzerland. The cell line Saos-2 was kindly provided by Arnold Levine, Princeton.

Human TCR transgenic T cells

Cloning of TCR genes from a T cell specific for p53, and the generation and the use of human p53 TCRtg T cells has been described recently.44 In brief, full length TCR αβ coding sequences from p53 (264–272) A2.1-specific cyototoxic T cells (CTLs) clone 46 were cloned and inserted into the retroviral vector pBullet p53. The α- and β-TCR expression vectors contained either an IRES-puro or -neo cassette (BD Bioscience Clonetech) downstream of the TCR α and β chains, respectively. Cocultured packaging cells were transfected by Fugene (Takara, Gennevilliers, France) with pBullet(-TCR) constructs, gag-pol (pHIT60) and env (pCOLT-GALV) vectors. Activated human PBMC were transduced twice in the presence of 40–100 U/ml rhIL-2 (Proleukin™, Chiron, Munich, Germany) and polybrene (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) at 4 mg/ml with packaging cell supernatant containing retroviral ab-TCR, GFP-IRES-neo, or IRES-neo and IRES-puro vectors. T cells were expanded by weekly stimulation with anti-human-CD3/-CD28 Dynabeads™ (1 ml/106 cells) (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) and human rhIL-2 (40–100 U/ml) and, as indicated, after selection with geneticin (Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 800 mg/ml and puromycin (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) at 5 mg/ml for 1 week. Cells were negatively selected by a MACS™ device (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) to obtain more than 96–99% pure CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell subsets.

Flow cytometry

Surface expression was quantified after antibody staining by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson), using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland). A total of 5,000–10,000 events/staining condition were evaluated.


Frozen samples from nevi, melanoma metastases, renal tissues and RCC were cut (10 μm), fixed in acetone and immunostained with anti-PD-L1 mAb (clone 5H1), anti-PD-L1-biotin (ebioscience), and isotype-control. The first and the latter were stained using secondary antibody (anti-mouse-biotin) and all were visualized using streptavidin-peroxidase (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and AEC-solution (Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Counterstaining was performed with hematoxilin/eosin (H/E).

In vitro generation of autologous DC

DCs were generated from monocytes enriched by elutriation, and then, cultured in supplemented RPMI plus 2% autologous serum together with human GM-CSF + IL-4 to obtain immature dendritic cells (iDCs). To obtain mature DCs (mDCs), fresh complete medium containing GM-CSF + IL-4 and TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and PGE2 was added to the culture on day 6.47, 48 The culture was continued for an additional 18 hr. The DCs were then harvested and pulsed during 2h at 37°C either with a modified Melan-A26–35L peptide (ELAGIGILTV) (30 μg/ml) and human β2-microglobulin (10 μg/ml) in serum-free complete medium or 10−6 M p53 peptide.44

In vitro generation of antigen-specific CTL

Generation and expansion of peptide-specific CTLs by stimulation with peptide-loaded DCs has been described previously.49, 50 In brief, PBMC were obtained from HLA-A2+ healthy donors by leukapheresis. CD8+ T cells were enriched by depletion of CD4+, CD11b+, CD16+, CD19+, CD20+ and CD56+ cells, using a midi-MACS device (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The resulting population consisted of >80% CD8+ T cells and was used as responder population. CD8+ T cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were cocultured with 2.5 × 104 peptide-pulsed autologous DCs per well (96 well round-bottom plates and 200 μl complete medium with 10% human AB serum and 1–2% T-cell growth factor (TCGF).51 Medium was changed twice a week, and T cells were restimulated after 7 days with fresh peptide-pulsed DCs. After each stimulation, cell numbers were calculated by counting trypan-blue-negative cells. Phenotypic analysis of T cells was performed using anti-CD3, anti-CD8 mAb and Melan-A-Tetramer staining.

Coculture of Melan-A-specific T cells with tumor cells

Generation of melanoma-specific T-cell lines, obtained from either the patients' tumor or PBL, has been described before.45 After thawing, the lymphocytes were stimulated and expanded with irradiated (100 Gy) autologous tumor cells at a ratio of 1 T cell/5 tumor cells in 24-well flat bottom plates in complete medium supplemented with human serum and 50 U/ml IL-2. After 1 week of stimulation, TILs and PBLs were restimulated with autologous melanoma cells that had been pretreated with or without IFN-γ (200 ng/ml for 48 hr, and then, washed 2 times and irradiated with 100 Gy) at 1:5 ratio in complete medium containing 10% human AB serum. After further 48 hr, supernatants were analyzed by ELISA for IL-2 and IFN-γ content.

Coculture of p53 TCRtg T cells with DCs and tumor cells

The generation of p53 TCRtg T cells has been described before.44 CD4+ p53 TCRtg or CD8+ p53 TCRtg T cells (2 × 105) were cocultured for 48 hr with 2 × 105 peptide-loaded iDCs or mDCs, with the p53-expressing RCC cell line MZ1851RC or HLA-deficient K562 cells, in the absence of cytokines. The IFN-γ Elispot (Diaclone, Besancon, France) and 51Chromium-release-assay was performed in duplicate wells as reported.52 Cytokine content in 48 hr supernatants (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-4) was determined using ELISA according to standard protocols, using the afore-mentioned capture and detector antibodies.

Blocking of PD-L1, CTLA-4 and CD80

To block costimulatory and coinhibitory signals during interaction of TIL, PBL and TCRtg CD4+ or CD8+ T cells with either of the tumor cells, iDCs or mDCs, blocking antibodies were added at the following concentrations to the medium: anti-PD-L1 (9 μg/ml), anti-CD80 (10 μg/ml) and anti-CTLA-4 (10 μg/ml). As a read-out, cytokine production was determined by Elispot or ELISA 48 hr later.

T cell stimulation with beads

TIL or PBL each from the same patient were stimulated by Beads (Dynal, Norway) that had been precoated (for 12 hr) with anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml). They were incubated for the indicated times at a ratio of 1 T cell/5 beads in supplemented RPMI plus 200 U/ml IL-2.


Statistical analysis applying 2 sample t-tests was performed using either MINITAB statistical software (Minitab) or Microsoft Excel.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

PD-L1 is expressed on human melanoma and RCC cell lines in vitro

Comparative data of constitutive expression of PD-L1 mRNA in normal tissue and absent surface expression of PD-L1 indicate a posttranscriptional control of PD-L1 surface expression.21, 53 Thus, most data concerning PD-L1 expression using analysis of mRNA levels are not representative. Eight human melanoma and 8 RCC cell lines were stained for their PD-L1 surface expression in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (200 ng/ml, 48 hr). All melanoma cell lines upregulated PD-L1 surface expression upon IFN-γ exposure, and 3 of them (Na8, Mel 108 and MeV20) expressed PD-L1 constitutively (Fig. 1a). In contrast, all except one RCC line constitutively expressed PD-L1 and upregulated the ligand upon IFN-γ treatment (Fig. 1b). Expression of HLA class I was detected on all cell lines and upregulated upon IFN-γ exposure (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Human melanoma and RCC lines express PD-L1 constitutively and increase upon IFN-γ. Human melanoma (a) and RCC lines (b) were cultured with (black) or without (grey) IFN-γ (200 ng/ml) for 48 hr in supplemented RPMI, stained for anti-PD-L1-PE (filled) or isotype control (black line) and analyzed using flow cytometry. Representative data of 3 independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint

PD-L1 is expressed on human melanoma metastases and primary RCC but not on normal tissues in situ

In a second approach, we examined cryosections from 8 human melanoma metastases and 8 primary RCC tumors. In line with other groups, we found PD-L1 to be expressed on some melanoma metastases and on some RCC,21, 39 but not on normal tissues (Fig. 2). None of the nevi or the nonmalignant renal tissues stained positively for PD-L1. In contrast, we found PD-L1 expression at significant levels (>30% of the cells) on 3 of the 8 melanoma metastases and on 2 of the 8 RCC (for patients' data see supplemental Table).

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Human melanoma metastasis and RCC express PD-L1 in vivo. Random samples of frozen tissues from biopsies of nevi (a), melanoma metastasis (b), renal tissue (c) and primary RCC (d) were stained using H/E and anti-PD-L1 mAb or isotype control Ab (inserts), biotinylated secondary antibody using streptavidin-peroxidase and AEC-solution for visualization. Representative data of 2 independent staining rounds of the identical samples.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Expression of the coinhibitory receptor PD-1 is elevated on TIL compared to that on PBL

A functional relevance of PD-L1 expression on human tumor cells would require a significant expression of the corresponding coinhibitory receptor PD-1 on the surface of tumor-specific T cells. To address this question, tumor-specific T cells generated from either PBL or TIL from the same melanoma patients were analyzed for PD-1 expression at different time points after stimulation with irradiated autologous tumor cells or anti-CD3/CD28 mAb beads plus IL-2. Similar to our previous data from murine T cells,22 we found PD-1 to be upregulated upon stimulation with a peak at day 2 after stimulation. In contrast to murine T cells, human TIL (Fig. 3a) and PBL (data not shown) do not express PD-1 constantly elevated after restimulation. In addition, PD-1 was expressed on TIL at higher levels compared to that on PBL, upon stimulation with autologous tumor cell lines (Fig. 3b). To exclude different TCR signals gained from different affinities towards the unknown tumor antigens when interacting with the tumor line, we also stimulated the TIL and the PBL lines with anti-CD3/CD28 bead-bound mAbs. Under these stimulation conditions, the TIL revealed still higher levels of PD-1 expression (Fig. 3c), whereas other activation markers, like CD25 or CD69, were elevated to similar or higher levels on PBL compared to that on TIL, after anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation (see supplemental Figure). Furthermore, the stimulation in absence of IL-2 resulted in cell death of both populations (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 3. PD-1 expression on TIL and PBL. (a) Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte line TIL067 was repeatedly stimulated with autologous tumor cells (MeR190), stained for PD-1 surface expression using FITC anti-PD-1 mAb at the indicated time points after stimulation and analyzed by flow cytometry. (b) TIL067 and peripheral blood lymphocyte line (PBL067) from the same patient were stimulated with MeR190 and stained for PD-1 surface expression. (c) TIL067 and PBL067 were stimulated with bead bound anti-CD3/CD28 mAb (1 μg/ml) and stained for PD-1 surface expression. Increased expression of PD-1 on TIL compared to that on PBL was observed while examining 3 different patients' TIL/PBL pairs.

Download figure to PowerPoint

PD1/PD-L1 interactions do not influence in vitro priming of tumor-associated antigen-specific T cells

Improving T cell immunotherapies could be reached by faster expansion of tumor-specific T cells from PBL up to the required numbers before transfusion. We therefore examined whether the presence of anti-PD-L1 mAb could lead to higher numbers of tumor-specific T cells during priming and early expansion phase, using peptide (Melan-A26–35L)-loaded DCs in the presence of T cell conditioned medium (TCGF).51 Addition of anti-PD-L1 led neither to higher overall numbers of CD8+ T cells, during 2 weeks of stimulation (Fig. 4, left panel, p = 0.786), nor to a higher yield of MelanA-tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4, right panel, p = 0.599). Stimulation of PBL in the absence of TCGF resulted in cell death of all PBL (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 4. In vitro priming of TAA-specific T cells is not influenced by PD1/PD-L1 interaction. PBLs from healthy donors were stimulated for 2 weeks with Melan-A-loaded autologous DC in supplemented RPMI medium plus T cell growth factor (TCGF) in the presence or absence of anti-PD-L1 mAb (10 μg/ml) or isotype control, stained with APC-CD8 mAb and PE-MelanA tetramer and analyzed using flow cytometry. The left panel shows the yield of total CD8+ T cells, and the left panel shows those of CD8+ Melan-A-tetramer+ T cells. Similar results were observed when adding anti-PD-L1 mAb after 4 weeks to the coculture (data not shown). Representative data of 3 independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Effector function of TAA-specific CTL and T helper cells is enhanced by neutralizing PD-1/PD-L1 interactions

As described earlier, neither DC-expanded PBL nor TIL lines were capable of surviving in vitro in the absence of high concentrations of cytokines. However, PD-L1 coinhibition has been shown to be most relevant under suboptimal TCR stimulation in absence of cytokines.25, 30 Stimulation of human p53 transgenic T cells with p53.264–272 peptide-loaded mature DCs allowed us to examine the effector function in the absence of exogenous cytokines. As shown in Figure 5a, we found increased numbers of IFN-γ-producing bulk T cells (detected by EliSpot) after coincubation of anti-PD-L1 mAb with peptide-loaded DCs. This holds also true for isolated CD4+ T cells (data not shown). Murine data indicate that PD-L1 inhibition predominantly occurs at TCR stimulation with anti-CD3 only and can be overcome by additional anti-CD28 costimulation.24, 30 Therefore, we analyzed T cell interaction with DCs in the absence or presence of costimulation. CD4+ T cells deliver essential activation and maturation signals to DC through CD40-CD40L interaction.54, 55, 56 and IFN-γ release.57 We found a slightly increased IL-2 production of human p53 TCRtg CD4+ T cells, when stimulated with is (p = 0.075), and significantly, when stimulated with mDCs (p = 0.013) by blockade of PD-L1 (Fig. 5b). IFN-γ was increased when stimulated with iDCs (p = 0.004) as well after stimulation with mDCs (p = 0.009) (Fig. 5c). We have previously shown that p53 TCRtg CD4+ can induce maturation of iDCs as assessed by induction of IL12p70.44 IL-12p70 production could be further enhanced in the presence of an anti-PD-L1 mAb (p = 0.010) (Fig. 5d).

thumbnail image

Figure 5. Anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment of p53 loaded DC increases p53-specific T cell activity independent of the level of CD80 costimulation. (a) 15 × 103 p53 tg T cells (80% CD4+, 20% CD8+) were cocultured with p53.264–272 peptide-loaded mature DC (E:T 0.3:1) or with HIV peptide-loaded DC in the presence of anti-PD-L1 mAb (6 μg/ml) or isotype control and analyzed after 16 hr for number of IFN-γ producing T cells, using EliSpot. (b) 2 × 105 CD4+ p53 TCRtg T cells were cocultured with 2 × 105 peptide-loaded iDCs or mDCs in the presence or absence of anti-PD-L1 (9 μg/ml) or anti-CTLA-4 (10 μg/ml) mAbs. IL-2 was determined in 48 hr supernatants by ELISA. (c) Identical to (b) CD4+ TCRtg T cells were cultured, and IFN-γ content in 48 hr supernatants was determined by ELISA. (D) 2 × 105 CD4+ p53 TCRtg T cells were cocultured with 2 × 105 peptide-loaded iDCs in the presence or absence of anti-PD-L1 (9 μg/ml), and IL-12p70 content in 48 hr supernatants was determined by ELISA. (E) 2 × 105 CD4+ p53 TCRtg T cells were cocultured with 2 × 105 peptide-loaded mDC in presence or absence of anti-PD-L1 (9 μg/ml) or anti-CD80 (10 μg/ml) mAb, and IFN-γ content was determined by ELISA. Representative data of at least 2 independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Recently, different signaling pathways have been postulated for PD-1 and CTLA-4.58 We therefore examined the effects on cytokine production when CTLA-4 blockade was introduced in addition to our system. CTLA-4 blockade improved the cytokine production of p53 TCRtg CD4+ T cells only in coculture with mDCs, but not with iDCs. However, synergistic effects of blockade of PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 on IL-2 production could be observed during coculture of the T cells with both iDCs (p = 0.008) and mDCs (p = 0.033) (Fig. 5b).

To examine the influence of costimulation on the effects of PD-L1 blockade, anti-CD80 mAb was added additionally during stimulation of human CD4+ p53 TCRtg T cells with peptide-loaded mDCs in the presence or absence of anti-PD-L1. In line with previous findings, blockade of CD80 decreased cytokine production of mDC-stimulated T cells (100% CD4+, FACS sorted). In contrast to the murine data, we found anti-PD-L1 blockade to improve human T cell function in the presence (p = 0.009) or absence of costimulation via CD80 (p = 0,003) (Fig. 5e). Similar results were observed when using bulk T cells populations (80% CD4, 20% CD8) (data not shown). Thus, in our system using TCRtg T cells, anti-PD-L1 blockade improves antigen-specific effector function in the absence as well as in the presence of CD80-costimulation.

Neutralization of PD-L1 increases CTL and T helper activity against p53 expressing RCC

To examine the coinhibitory role of PD-1 during the effector phase of the antitumor T cell response, PD-L1 expressing tumor cells were incubated with neutralizing anti-PD-L1 mAb. The HLA-A2-positive RCC cell line MZ1851RC expresses p53 and is recognized by high-affinity p53 TCRtg human CTL and T helper cells.44 As shown in Figure 1b, PD-L1 is constitutively expressed on this cell line and upregulated upon IFN-γ exposure. Previous experiments using human tumor cell lines transfected with PD-L1 indicated an inhibitory effect of PD-L1 on tumor-specific T cells.21 Similarly, cytokine production and expression of T cell activation markers were increased when CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were stimulated with allogeneic PD-L1 expressing glioma cells.42 Using p53 TCRtg CD4+ and CD8+ T cells allowed to examine the modulation of cytokine production from TAA-specific T cells upon interaction with their target cells. We found that endogenous (and thus lower) PD-L1 expression on human tumor cells is already capable in mediating coinhibition of tumor-specific T cells. The number of IFN-γ-producing p53-specific TCRtg T cells tends to be increased (p = 0.178) when neutralizing anti-PD-L1 was added to the coculture with the tumor line (Fig. 6a). In addition, we found increased TNF-α production by CD8+ p53 TCRtg T cells (p = 0.071), which was significantly elevated when coculturing CD4+ p53 TCRtg T cells (p = 0.011) with p53 expressing tumor cells (Fig. 6b). IFN-γ production could be elevated significantly in both subpopulations (p = 0.033 for CD8+ and p = 0.026 for CD4+) by blockade of PD-L1 (Fig. 6c), as well as the lytic activity of p53-specific CTL (Fig. 6d). IL-2 and IL-4 production was not detectable in both T cell subpopulations (data not shown). Similar results for the inhibitory role of PD-L1 were observed for selected CD4+ as well as CD8+ T cells when coculturing with the p53 transfected osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2/143 (data not shown).

thumbnail image

Figure 6. Anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment of p53 expressing RCC increases p53-specific T cell activity. (a) 7.5 × 103 P53 TCRtg T cells (>95% CD4+) were cocultured with p53- and PD-L1-expressing RCC line MZ1851RC for 40 hr with or without the inhibitory antibody anti-PD-L1 (6 μg/ml), and the number of IFN-γ producing T cells was detected. HLA-negative K562 and HLA-A2-positive but p53-negative cell line Saos-2 served as negative controls. (b, c) 2 × 105 p53 TCRtg T cells (CD4+ or CD8+) were cocultured with 2 × 105 MZ1851RC tumor cells in presence or absence of anti-PD-L1 mAb (9 μg/ml). TNF-α (b) and IFN-γ (c) content in 48 hr supernatants was determined. (d) p53 TCRtg or Mock infected T cells (>95% CD8+) were incubated with MZ1851 RC (triangle), p53-negative Saos-2 (circle) or HLA-negative K562 (square) with (closed symbols) or without (open symbols) anti-PD-L1 (9 μg/ml). Representative data of 2 independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

PD-L1 (B7-H1) is the first T cell coinhibitory molecule that has been reported to exhibit a strong correlation of its expression on RCC with the patient's cancer-specific survival rate.39 Data from experiments using transfected human tumor cell lines and from animal models indicate a negative regulatory role of PD-L1 on tumor cells for tumor-specific T cells, resulting in impaired immune control of tumor growth and spread.20, 21, 22, 41 However, to our knowledge, the functional relevance of endogenous (and thus lower) PD-L1 expression on tumor cells towards human tumor-specific T cells has not been examined so far. Our study supports the hypothesis of PD-L1 as a mediator of tumor escape from tumor-specific T cells.53 Furthermore, we were able to show that TIL express PD-1 at higher levels compared to PBL, which may explain the observations of clinical tumor progression despite the presence of tumor-specific T cells infiltrating the tumors.46

PD-L1 represents a recently identified coinhibitory molecule belonging to the B7 family molecules.24 In the majority of studies, ligation of the cognate receptor PD-1 leads to negative regulation of T cell responses in vitro.25, 59 Studies using PD-1−/ T cells supported the notion of PD-1 impairing T cell proliferation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity.22, 24

Despite a wide mRNA expression in murine and human tissues,24, 59, 60, 61 constitutive surface expression of PD-L1 has been described only on endothelial cells and at the human maternal-fetal interface.62, 63 These data and the fact that PD-1 gene-deficient mice develop autoimmune diseases early led to the hypothesis of PD-L1/PD-1 interactions regulating peripheral tolerance.60 In addition, PD-L1 was reported to be expressed on a wide variety of murine and human tumors, either constitutively or upon exposure to IFN-γ.22, 42, 53, 64 Tumor-associated PD-L1 has been shown in animal models to inhibit antitumoral T cell responses,20 implying PD-L1 to play a pivotal role in tumor evasion from antitumor immune responses.20, 53, 65 Furthermore, it has been shown that activated T cells also express PD-L1, raising the possibility of self-restriction of an antitumor T cell response during the priming phase.22, 66 We thus addressed, in our study, the question at which stages and under which conditions of induction and effector phases of human tumor-specific T cell responses the addition of neutralizing anti-PD-L1 mAb might be beneficial.

Human melanoma and RCC are thought to be the most immunogenic tumors and are thus focus of different immunotherapeutic studies.3, 6, 67, 68, 69 As there are conflicting data concerning PD-L1 expression depending on mRNA or surface analysis,21, 24, 59 we decided to focus on surface expression analysis of human melanoma and RCC. In line with other groups,21, 39 we found no PD-L1 expression on normal tissues, but to some extent on RCC and on melanoma metastases, when examining cryosections. FACS analysis revealed PD-L1 expression on all human tumor lines, either constitutive or upon stimulation with IFN-γ. Interestingly, we found a constitutive PD-L1 expression on a vast majority of RCC lines, while most melanoma cell lines were negative in the absence of IFN-γ. Together with the findings concerning a prognostic relevance of PD-L1 on RCC,39 our data suggest that the blockade of PD-L1 for T cell based therapies might be the most promising approach for RCC patients.

Despite sufficient survival and tumor localization of tumor-specific lymphocytes,7 adoptive cell transfer therapies (ACT) using melanoma-specific T-cell clones or TIL seldom induce objective clinical responses.3, 4, 70, 71, 72 Latter results are contrary to the notion of TIL to show a higher activation status and a superior production of effector cytokines compared to PBL.73, 74, 75, 76 We thus hypothesized that TIL might be, despite a superior activation, more susceptible to a tumor mediated inhibition because of an increased upregulation of PD-1 during stimulation. Indeed, we found higher PD-1 surface expression on TIL compared to that on PBL from the same patients. As one could argue that this might result from a better interaction of the TIL with the tumor, and thus, a better activation-associated PD-1 upregulation, we also stimulated TIL and PBL with anti-CD3/CD28 mAb. We found consistent higher levels of PD-1 expression on TIL, and therefore, conclude that TIL might be more susceptible towards PD-L1/PD-1 mediated coinhibition than PBL. Thus, the superior ability of TIL to infiltrate cancer tissues might be negated by a higher susceptibility for coinhibtion.

High expression of PD-1 on primed T cells and TIL, but absence on resting T cells22 indicates that PD-L1 mediated inhibition might play only a role on effector T cells but not on resting T cells. We thus first addressed the question, whether PD-L1 blockade during priming of Melan-A-specific T cells by peptide-loaded DCs might alter the yield of tumor-specific T cells. As expected, we found no improved expansion of PBL when stimulated with peptide-loaded DCs in the presence of supporting cytokines. These data indicate that resting T cells are not susceptible for a PD-L1 mediated inhibition. A challenge to this conclusion is that our data were generated in the presence of cytokines, including IL-2, which has been previously shown to overcome PD-L1 inhibitory effects at high doses.25 Even though only very low doses are present in our setting, we cannot rule out the influence of the cytokines. Unfortunately, stimulating the T cells with peptide-loaded DCs in the absence of exogenous cytokines resulted in complete apoptosis of the stimulated T cells. Thus, the examination of an inhibitory effect of PD-L1 on resting human T cells in vitro in absence of cytokines could not be addressed.

To examine the role of PD-L1 inhibitory effects on effector T cells, we used p53 TCRtg human T cells.44 In contrast to our data using resting T cells, anti-PD-L1 mAb improved immune functions of these effector T cells when stimulating with peptide-loaded DCs.

Inhibitory effects of anti-PD-L1 were observed in both subpopulations, however, CD4+ T cells seemed to be more dependent on PD-L1 inhibition. As these observations were made in the absence of cytokine support, but in the presence of CD28 costimulation, we addressed, in further experiments, whether inhibition of costimulation via CD80 increases PD-L1 inhibitory effects, as shown for naïve murine T cells.30 We found in our system that PD-1/PD-L1-blockade improved IFN-γ production independent of the presence or absence of CD80 costimulation. In contrast to previous murine data using PD-L1 overexpressing leukemia cells as stimulators,77 we found no synergistic effects of blockade of PD-L1 and CD80. Taking together, we thus conclude (in line with our and others previous data from mouse models) that PD-L1 plays a more critical role at the effector phase of T cell responses.22, 37 Considering the data that show increased PD-L1 expression on DCs from tumor draining lymph nodes,43 the inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction seems to be crucial for the maintenance of a sufficient antitumor immune response, even after transfer of optimized tumor antigen-specific T cells.

Recent data hypothesized independent inhibitory mechanisms of PD-1 and CTLA-4.58 Addressing these ideas, we found the blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 to synergistically improve immune cytokine production of p53 TCRtg CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, additional PD-L1 blockade seems to improve immune functions synergistically with CTLA-4, in situations when CTLA-4 blockade doesn't alter T cell function (stimulation with iDCs), supporting the ideas of both molecules signaling via independent pathways. Inhibiting both inhibitory signals thus could mediate anti-tumor immune responses superior to the ones seen in absence of one coinhibitory molecule.22, 78

Finally, we addressed whether PD-L1 blockade could improve immune functions of tumor-specific effector T cells when interacting with their target tumor cells. Indeed, we found increased numbers of effector T cells, increased cytokine production and improved tumor lysis, when PD-L1 was inhibited by mAb. These data are in line with previous findings using PD-L1 transfected tumor lines.21, 64 To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that blockade of endogenous (and thus much lower) PD-L1 expression on human cancer cells still can improve the immune functions of tumor-specific T cells.

Our studies support the notion that PD-L1 blockade, alone and in synergy with CTLA-4, can improve the efficiency of cancer immunotherapies. These improved signals can overcome, at least in part, the absence of costimulation. Thus, the selective blocking of PD-L1 in T cell based immunotherapy, especially of RCC, should be of high priority for future studies.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

We thank T. Schunder, J. Schweimer and E. Antunes for excellent technical assistance and J. Heymann, M. Laumer and S. Vogl for technical support.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information
  • 1
    Abbott A. Cancer research: on the offensive. Nature 2002; 416: 4704.
  • 2
    Ryan MH, Bristol JA, McDuffie E, Abrams SI. Regression of extensive pulmonary metastases in mice by adoptive transfer of antigen-specific CD8(+) CTL reactive against tumor cells expressing a naturally occurring rejection epitope. J Immunol 2001; 167: 428692.
  • 3
    Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry R, Restifo NP, Hubicki AM, Robinson MR, Raffeld M, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 2002; 298: 8504.
  • 4
    Marincola FM, Jaffee EM, Hicklin DJ, Ferrone S. Escape of human solid tumors from T-cell recognition: molecular mechanisms and functional significance. Adv Immunol 2000; 74: 181273.
  • 5
    Cohen PA, Peng L, Kjaergaard J, Plautz GE, Finke JH, Koski GK, Czerniecki BJ, Shu S. T-cell adoptive therapy of tumors: mechanisms of improved therapeutic performance. Crit Rev Immunol 2001; 21: 21548.
  • 6
    Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Topalian SL, Restifo NP, Royal RE, Kammula U, White DE, Mavroukakis SA, Rogers LJ, Gracia GJ, et al. Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 234657.
  • 7
    Meidenbauer N, Marienhagen J, Laumer M, Vogl S, Heymann J, Andreesen R, Mackensen A. Survival and tumor localization of adoptively transferred Melan-A-specific T cells in melanoma patients. J Immunol 2003; 170: 21619.
  • 8
    Mackensen A, Wittnebel S, Veelken H, Noppen C, Spagnoli GC, Lindermann A. Induction and large-scale expansion of CD8+ tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes from peripheral blood lymphocytes by in vitro stimulation with CD80-transfected autologous melanoma cells. Eur Cytokine Netw 1999; 10: 32936.
  • 9
    Singh S, Ross SR, Acena M, Rowley DA, Schreiber H. Stroma is critical for preventing or permitting immunological destruction of antigenic cancer cells. J Exp Med 1992; 175: 13946.
  • 10
    Romero P, Dunbar PR, Valmori D, Pittet M, Ogg GS, Rimoldi D, Chen JL, Lienard D, Cerottini JC, Cerundolo V. Ex vivo staining of metastatic lymph nodes by class I major histocompatibility complex tetramers reveals high numbers of antigen-experienced tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1998; 188: 164150.
  • 11
    Carreno BM, Collins M. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2002; 20: 2953.
  • 12
    Chambers CA. The expanding world of co-stimulation: the two-signal model revisited. Trends Immunol 2001; 22: 21723.
  • 13
    Subudhi SK, Alegre ML, Fu YX. The balance of immune responses: costimulation verse coinhibition. J Mol Med 2005; 83: 193202.
  • 14
    Subudhi SK, Zhou P, Yerian LM, Chin RK, Lo JC, Anders RA, Sun Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Alegre ML, Fu YX. Local expression of B7-H1 promotes organ-specific autoimmunity and transplant rejection. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 694700.
  • 15
    Abken H, Hombach A, Heuser C, Kronfeld K, Seliger B. Tuning tumor-specific T-cell activation: a matter of costimulation? Trends Immunol 2002; 23: 2405.
  • 16
    Egen JG, Kuhns MS, Allison JP. CTLA-4: new insights into its biological function and use in tumor immunotherapy. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 61118.
  • 17
    Chambers CA, Kuhns MS, Egen JG, Allison JP. CTLA-4-mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol 2001; 19: 56594.
  • 18
    van Elsas A, Hurwitz AA, Allison JP. Combination immunotherapy of B16 melanoma using anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing vaccines induces rejection of subcutaneous and metastatic tumors accompanied by autoimmune depigmentation. J Exp Med 1999; 190: 35566.
  • 19
    Hurwitz AA, Yu TF, Leach DR, Allison JP. CTLA-4 blockade synergizes with tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for treatment of an experimental mammary carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 1006771.
  • 20
    Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Minato N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 122937.
  • 21
    Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, Lennon VA, Celis E, et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med 2002; 8: 793800.
  • 22
    Blank C, Brown I, Peterson AC, Spiotto M, Iwai Y, Honjo T, Gajewski TF. PD-L1/B7H-1 inhibits the effector phase of tumor rejection by T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 11405.
  • 23
    Brown JA, Dorfman DM, Ma FR, Sullivan EL, Munoz O, Wood CR, Greenfield EA, Freeman GJ. Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances T cell activation and cytokine production. J Immunol 2003; 170: 125766.
  • 24
    Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, Fitz LJ, Malenkovich N, Okazaki T, Byrne MC, Horton HF, Fouser L, et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 2000; 192: 102734.
  • 25
    Carter L, Fouser LA, Jussif J, Fitz L, Deng B, Wood CR, Collins M, Honjo T, Freeman GJ, Carreno BM. PD-1:PD-L inhibitory pathway affects both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and is overcome by IL-2. Eur J Immunol 2002; 32: 63443.
  • 26
    Selenko-Gebauer N, Majdic O, Szekeres A, Hofler G, Guthann E, Korthauer U, Zlabinger G, Steinberger P, Pickl WF, Stockinger H, Knapp W, Stockl J. B7-h1 (programmed death-1 ligand) on dendritic cells is involved in the induction and maintenance of T cell anergy. J Immunol 2003; 170: 363744.
  • 27
    Blank C, Brown I, Marks R, Nishimura H, Honjo T, Gajewski TF. Absence of programmed death receptor 1 alters thymic development and enhances generation of CD4/CD8 double-negative TCR-transgenic T cells. J Immunol 2003; 171: 457481.
  • 28
    Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J 1992; 11: 388795.
  • 29
    Nishimura H, Agata Y, Kawasaki A, Sato M, Imamura S, Minato N, Yagita H, Nakano T, Honjo T. Developmentally regulated expression of the PD-1 protein on the surface of double-negative (CD4−CD8−) thymocytes. Int Immunol 1996; 8: 77380.
  • 30
    Tamura H, Dong H, Zhu G, Sica GL, Flies DB, Tamada K, Chen L. B7-H1 costimulation preferentially enhances CD28-independent T-helper cell function. Blood 2001; 97: 180916.
  • 31
    Dong H, Zhu G, Tamada K, Chen L. B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med 1999; 5: 13659.
  • 32
    Youngnak P, Kozono Y, Kozono H, Iwai H, Otsuki N, Jin H, Omura K, Yagita H, Pardoll DM, Chen L, Azuma M. Differential binding properties of B7-H1 and B7-DC to programmed death-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 307: 6727.
  • 33
    Wang S, Bajorath J, Flies DB, Dong H, Honjo T, Chen L. Molecular modeling and functional mapping of B7-H1 and B7-DC uncouple costimulatory function from PD-1 interaction. J Exp Med 2003; 197: 108391.
  • 34
    Chemnitz JM, Parry RV, Nichols KE, June CH, Riley JL. SHP-1 and SHP-2 associate with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif of programmed death 1 upon primary human T cell stimulation, but only receptor ligation prevents T cell activation. J Immunol 2004; 173: 94554.
  • 35
    Nishimura H, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, Nakatani K, Hara M, Matsumori A, Sasayama S, Mizoguchi A, Hiai H, Minato N, Honjo T. Autoimmune dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1 receptor-deficient mice. Science 2001; 291: 31922.
  • 36
    Nishimura H, Nose M, Hiai H, Minato N, Honjo T. Development of lupus-like autoimmune diseases by disruption of the PD-1 gene encoding an ITIM motif-carrying immunoreceptor. Immunity 1999; 11: 14151.
  • 37
    Iwai Y, Terawaki S, Ikegawa M, Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 inhibits antiviral immunity at the effector phase in the liver. J Exp Med 2003; 198: 3950.
  • 38
    Bachmann MF, Waterhouse P, Speiser DE, McKall-Faienza K, Mak TW, Ohashi PS. Normal responsiveness of CTLA-4-deficient anti-viral cytotoxic T cells. J Immunol 1998; 160: 95100.
  • 39
    Thompson RH, Gillett MD, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Dong H, Webster WS, Krejci KG, Lobo JR, Sengupta S, Chen L, Zincke H, Blute ML, et al. Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 171749.
  • 40
    Ohigashi Y, Sho M, Yamada Y, Tsurui Y, Hamada K, Ikeda N, Mizuno T, Yoriki R, Kashizuka H, Yane K, Tsushima F, Otsuki N, et al. Clinical significance of programmed death-1 ligand-1 and programmed death-1 ligand-2 expression in human esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 294753.
  • 41
    Iwai Y, Terawaki S, Honjo T. PD-1 blockade inhibits hematogenous spread of poorly immunogenic tumor cells by enhanced recruitment of effector T cells. Int Immunol 2005; 17: 13344.
  • 42
    Wintterle S, Schreiner B, Mitsdoerffer M, Schneider D, Chen L, Meyermann R, Weller M, Wiendl H. Expression of the B7-related molecule B7-H1 by glioma cells: a potential mechanism of immune paralysis. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 74627.
  • 43
    Curiel TJ, Wei S, Dong H, Alvarez X, Cheng P, Mottram P, Krzysiek R, Knutson KL, Daniel B, Zimmermann MC, David O, Burow M, et al. Blockade of B7-H1 improves myeloid dendritic cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Nat Med 2003; 9: 5627.
  • 44
    Kuball J, Schmitz FW, Voss RH, Ferreira EA, Engel R, Guillaume P, Strand S, Romero P, Huber C, Sherman LA, Theobald M. Cooperation of human tumor-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after redirection of their specificity by a high-affinity p53A2.1-specific TCR. Immunity 2005; 22: 11729.
  • 45
    Mackensen A, Veelken H, Lahn M, Wittnebel S, Becker D, Kohler G, Kulmburg P, Brennscheidt U, Rosenthal F, Franke B, Mertelsmann R, Lindemann A. Induction of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by immunization with autologous tumor cells and interleukin-2 gene transfected fibroblasts. J Mol Med 1997; 75: 2906.
  • 46
    Meidenbauer N, Zippelius A, Pittet MJ, Laumer M, Vogl S, Heymann J, Rehli M, Seliger B, Schwarz S, Le Gal FA, Dietrich PY, Andreesen R, et al. High frequency of functionally active Melan-a-specific T cells in a patient with progressive immunoproteasome-deficient melanoma. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 631926.
  • 47
    Jonuleit H, Kuhn U, Muller G, Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Schmitt E, Knop J, Enk AH. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27: 313542.
  • 48
    Jonuleit H, Giesecke-Tuettenberg A, Tuting T, Thurner-Schuler B, Stuge TB, Paragnik L, Kandemir A, Lee PP, Schuler G, Knop J, Enk AH. A comparison of two types of dendritic cell as adjuvants for the induction of melanoma-specific T-cell responses in humans following intranodal injection. Int J Cancer 2001; 93: 24351.
  • 49
    Oelke M, Moehrle U, Chen JL, Behringer D, Cerundolo V, Lindemann A, Mackensen A. Generation and purification of CD8+ melan-A-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes for adoptive transfer in tumor immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 19972005.
  • 50
    Oelke M, Kurokawa T, Hentrich I, Behringer D, Cerundolo V, Lindemann A, Mackensen A. Functional characterization of CD8(+) antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes after enrichment based on cytokine secretion: comparison with the MHC-tetramer technology. Scand J Immunol 2000; 52: 5449.
  • 51
    Mackensen A, Carcelain G, Viel S, Raynal MC, Michalaki H, Triebel F, Bosq J, Hercend T. Direct evidence to support the immunosurveillance concept in a human regressive melanoma. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1397402.
  • 52
    Kuball J, Schuler M, Antunes Ferreira E, Herr W, Neumann M, Obenauer-Kutner L, Westreich L, Huber C, Wolfel T, Theobald M. Generating p53-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by recombinant adenoviral vector-based vaccination in mice, but not man. Gene Ther 2002; 9: 83343.
  • 53
    Dong H, Chen L. B7-H1 pathway and its role in the evasion of tumor immunity. J Mol Med 2003; 81: 2817.
  • 54
    Bennett SR, Carbone FR, Karamalis F, Flavell RA, Miller JF, Heath WR. Help for cytotoxic-T-cell responses is mediated by CD40 signalling. Nature 1998; 393: 47880.
  • 55
    Ridge JP, Di Rosa F, Matzinger P. A conditioned dendritic cell can be a temporal bridge between a CD4+ T-helper and a T-killer cell. Nature 1998; 393: 4748.
  • 56
    Schoenberger SP, Toes RE, van der Voort EI, Offringa R, Melief CJ. T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40-CD40L interactions. Nature 1998; 393: 4803.
  • 57
    Snijders A, Kalinski P, Hilkens CM, Kapsenberg ML. High-level IL-12 production by human dendritic cells requires two signals. Int Immunol 1998; 10: 15938.
  • 58
    Parry RV, Chemnitz JM, Frauwirth KA, Lanfranco AR, Braunstein I, Kobayashi SV, Linsley PS, Thompson CB, Riley JL. CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 954353.
  • 59
    Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T, Chaudhary D, Borde M, Chernova I, Iwai Y, Long AJ, Brown JA, Nunes R, Greenfield EA, Bourque K, et al. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 2618.
  • 60
    Nishimura H, Honjo T. PD-1: an inhibitory immunoreceptor involved in peripheral tolerance. Trends Immunol 2001; 22: 2658.
  • 61
    Ozkaynak E, Wang L, Goodearl A, McDonald K, Qin S, O'Keefe T, Duong T, Smith T, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Rottman JB, Coyle AJ, Hancock WW. Programmed death-1 targeting can promote allograft survival. J Immunol 2002; 169: 654653.
  • 62
    Eppihimer MJ, Gunn J, Freeman GJ, Greenfield EA, Chernova T, Erickson J, Leonard JP. Expression and regulation of the PD-L1 immunoinhibitory molecule on microvascular endothelial cells. Microcirculation 2002; 9: 13345.
  • 63
    Petroff MG, Chen L, Phillips TA, Azzola D, Sedlmayr P, Hunt JS. B7 family molecules are favorably positioned at the human maternal-fetal interface. Biol Reprod 2003; 68: 1496504.
  • 64
    Strome SE, Dong H, Tamura H, Voss SG, Flies DB, Tamada K, Salomao D, Cheville J, Hirano F, Lin W, Kasperbauer JL, Ballman KV, et al. B7-H1 blockade augments adoptive T-cell immunotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 65015.
  • 65
    Blank C, Gajewski TF, Mackensen A. Interaction of PD-L1 on tumor cells with PD-1 on tumor-specific T cells as a mechanism of immune evasion: implications for tumor immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2005; 54: 30714.
  • 66
    Dong H, Strome SE, Matteson EL, Moder KG, Flies DB, Zhu G, Tamura H, Driscoll CL, Chen L. Costimulating aberrant T cell responses by B7-H1 autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 36370.
  • 67
    Mackensen A, Herbst B, Chen JL, Kohler G, Noppen C, Herr W, Spagnoli GC, Cerundolo V, Lindemann A. Phase I study in melanoma patients of a vaccine with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells generated in vitro from CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells. Int J Cancer 2000; 86: 38592.
  • 68
    Thompson JA, Figlin RA, Sifri-Steele C, Berenson RJ, Frohlich MW. A phase I trial of CD3/CD28-activated T cells (Xcellerated T cells) and interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 356270.
  • 69
    Kawai K, Saijo K, Oikawa T, Morishita Y, Noguchi M, Ohno T, Akaza H. Clinical course and immune response of a renal cell carcinoma patient to adoptive transfer of autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Clin Exp Immunol 2003; 134: 2649.
  • 70
    Yee C, Thompson JA, Byrd D, Riddell SR, Roche P, Celis E, Greenberg PD. Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1616873.
  • 71
    Dudley ME, Wunderlich J, Nishimura MI, Yu D, Yang JC, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM, Sherry R, Leitman SF, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive transfer of cloned melanoma-reactive T lymphocytes for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. J Immunother 2001; 24: 36373.
  • 72
    Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry RM, Marincola FM, Leitman SF, Seipp CA, Rogers-Freezer L, Morton KE, et al. A phase I study of nonmyeloablative chemotherapy and adoptive transfer of autologous tumor antigen-specific T lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Immunother 2002; 25: 24351.
  • 73
    Elsasser-Beile U, Przytulski B, Gierschner D, Grussenmeyer T, Katzenwadel A, Leiber C, Deckart A, Wetterauer U. Comparison of the activation status of tumor infiltrating and peripheral lymphocytes of patients with adenocarcinomas and benign hyperplasia of the prostate. Prostate 2000; 45: 17.
  • 74
    Elsasser-Beile U, Rindsfuser M, Grussenmeyer T, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U. Enhanced expression of IFN-gamma mRNA in CD4(+) or CD8(+) tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes compared to peripheral lymphocytes in patients with renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 63741.
  • 75
    Oliver G, Yannelli J, Solomon D. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Cytologic, phenotypic and morphometric analysis. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 6914.
  • 76
    Santin AD, Hermonat PL, Ravaggi A, Bellone S, Roman JJ, Smith CV, Pecorelli S, Radominska-Pandya A, Cannon MJ, Parham GP. Phenotypic and functional analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared with tumor-associated lymphocytes from ascitic fluid and peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2001; 51: 25461.
  • 77
    Saudemont A, Quesnel B. In a model of tumor dormancy, long-term persistent leukemic cells have increased B7-H1 and B7.1 expression and resist CTL-mediated lysis. Blood 2004; 104: 212433.
  • 78
    Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science 1996; 271: 17346.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

This article contains supplementary material available via the Internet at .

jws-ijc.21775.fig1.pdf2633KSupporting Information file jws-ijc.21775.fig1.pdf
jws-ijc.21775.tbl1.pdf39KSupporting Information file jws-ijc.21775.tbl1.pdf

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.