Early Detection and Diagnosis
Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia
Article first published online: 30 MAY 2006
Copyright © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
International Journal of Cancer
Volume 119, Issue 8, pages 1908–1914, 15 October 2006
How to Cite
Wisman, G. B. A., Nijhuis, E. R., Hoque, M. O., Reesink-Peters, N., Koning, A. J., Volders, H. H., Buikema, H. J., Boezen, H. M., Hollema, H., Schuuring, E., Sidransky, D. and van der Zee, A. G.J. (2006), Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia. Int. J. Cancer, 119: 1908–1914. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22060
- Issue published online: 11 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 30 MAY 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 MAR 2006
- Manuscript Received: 4 OCT 2005
- OncoMethylome Sciences S.A., Liège, Belgium
- Dutch Cancer Society (NKB). Grant Number: RUG 2004-3161
- cervical cancer;
Current cervical cancer screening is based on morphological assessment of Pap smears and associated with significant false negative and false positive results. Previously, we have shown that detection of hypermethylated genes in cervical scrapings using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) is a promising tool for identification of squamous cell cervical cancer. Aim of the present pilot-study was to evaluate presence of hypermethylated genes in cervical carcinogenesis, both in squamous cell as well as adenocarcinomas. Cervical scrapings were obtained from 30 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (20 squamous cell carcinomas and 10 adenocarcinomas) and 19 women with histologically normal cervices. The scraped cells were used for determination of promoter hypermethylation by QMSP for 12 genes and for morphological assessment. Overall, CALCA, DAPK, ESR1, TIMP3, APC and RAR-β2 promoters were significantly more often hypermethylated in cancers than in controls, while adenocarcinomas were more often hypermethylated above the highest control ratio for APC, TIMP3 and RASSF1A promoters. Combining 4 genes (CALCA, DAPK, ESR1 and APC) yielded a sensitivity of 89% (with all adenocarcinomas identified), equal to cytomorphology (89%) and high-risk human papilloma virus (Hr-HPV; 90%). The 4-gene QMSP proved theoretically superior to cytomorphology as well as Hr-HPV in specificity (100% vs. 83 and 68%, respectively), because cytology identified 3 controls as moderate or severe dyskaryosis and 6 controls were positive for Hr-HPV. In conclusions, QMSP of 4 gene promoters combined appears to have comparable sensitivity and potentially better specificity in comparison to “classic” cytomorphological assessment and Hr-HPV detection. QMSP holds promise as a new diagnostic tool for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.