Letter to the Editor
Chronic candidosis and oral cancer in APECED-patients: Production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde from glucose and ethanol by Candida albicans
Article first published online: 2 SEP 2008
Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
International Journal of Cancer
Volume 124, Issue 3, pages 754–756, 1 February 2009
How to Cite
Uittamo, J., Siikala, E., Kaihovaara, P., Salaspuro, M. and Rautemaa, R. (2009), Chronic candidosis and oral cancer in APECED-patients: Production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde from glucose and ethanol by Candida albicans. Int. J. Cancer, 124: 754–756. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23976
- Issue published online: 18 NOV 2008
- Article first published online: 2 SEP 2008
- Accepted manuscript online: 2 SEP 2008 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 AUG 2008
- Manuscript Received: 15 JUL 2008
- Sigrid Juselius Foundation
- Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation
- Finnish Dental Society Apollonia
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki
Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations of the AIRE (autoimmune regulator) gene.1–3 It is associated with a limited T lymphocyte defect and an autoimmune response to various tissues, particularly endocrine glands. It mainly causes a set of three abnormal features; chronic mucocutaneous candidosis, hypoparathyroidism and adrenal insufficiency.4 Most patients have chronic oral candidosis since early childhood. Of all the APECED patients in Finland that are beyond the age of 25, 10% have developed oral or oesophageal carcinoma at the site of chronic mucositis.5 It is the only malignancy diagnosed in these patients. The age at cancer diagnosis was markedly low (29–44 years), significantly lower than for oral or oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in general. The pathogenetic mechanism behind APECED associated oral cancer has so far remained unclear.6–9
The most important risk factors for upper digestive tract cancers are tobacco smoking, alcohol intake, and poor oral hygiene.10–12 They all associate with increased acetaldehyde (ACH) levels in saliva, and there is strong evidence supporting the role of ACH as a common dominator.13–18 The mechanism leading to increased ACH levels in saliva after alcohol consumption is local microbial ACH production, i.e. the oxidation of salivary ethanol (EtOH) to ACH by microbial alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)-enzyme.15–17 Previous studies have shown that Candida albicans can produce significant amounts of carcinogenic ACH in clinically relevant EtOH concentrations.19
It has been demonstrated that polyamines are able to facilitate the formation of mutagenic DNA-adducts in biologically relevant ACH concentrations (50–100 μM).14 The local in vivo carcinogenic effect of ACH is derived from epidemiological and biochemical studies on aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2)-deficient Asians. The mitochondrial ALDH2-enzyme is responsible for most of the ACH oxidation to acetate. Among ALDH2-deficient subjects this enzyme is partly inactive, which results in the accumulation of ACH in saliva after alcohol drinking.20 In Asian heavy drinkers ALDH2-deficiency is associated with a 10-fold risk of oral cancer when compared to those with the normal ALDH2-enzyme.21 However, the relationship between glucose and ACH production by Candida albicans has not been investigated previously. C. albicans may play a role in metabolizing glucose into carcinogenic ACH in the mouth and could participate in the pathogenesis of oral cancer in non-alcohol drinkers. The aim of this study was to compare the production of ACH from EtOH and glucose by oral candida isolates from APECED patients with control isolates.
A total of 67 clinical oral isolates and one reference strain (ATCC 90029) of Candida albicans were selected for this study. Of these, 44 were isolated from 21 APECED patients during the years 1994–2007 (1–4 isolates/patients) mainly as reported earlier.22 Twelve isolates from patients with oral carcinoma were designated as cancer-isolates and 11 isolates obtained from patients with oral candidosis but without any mucosal neoplasia were designated as control-isolates. The C. albicans isolates were identified from patient samples using conventional culture and identification methods at the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Helsinki University Central Hospital. The identification of C. albicans was based on colony morphology on CHROMagar® Candida medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France), and the negative Bichro-Dubli® latex co-agglutination test result (Fumouze Diagnostics, Levallois Perret, France). C. albicans strains were subcultured on Sabouraud Dextrose agar (SP; Saboraud Dextrose Agar (Lab M), Bacto Agar (Difco) supplemented with penicillin (100 000 ui/ml) and streptomycin) for 48 hr at 35°C. Colonies were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 0.4 at 492 nm (Multiscan RC spectrophotometer, Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) corresponding to 1 × 107 colony forming units per millilitre (CFU/ml) as controlled by dilution plating.
A total of 400 μl of the yeast suspension was transferred into a gas chromatograph vial. Thereafter, 50 μl of PBS-buffer containing EtOH or glucose was added and the vial was immediately closed tightly. The final EtOH concentration was adjusted to 11 mM and the final glucose concentration to 100 mM. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and the reaction was stopped by injecting 50 μl of perchloric acid (PCA, 6M) through the rubber septum of the test vial. Every isolate was assayed in triplicate and the mean was used for the analyses. To measure the baseline and artefactual ACH, 50 μl of PCA was immediately added to control vials and the suspension was equally incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The formed ACH was measured by gas chromatography as reported earlier.23
Results are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data was analyzed by using Graph Pad Prism version 5.00 (GraphPad Inc. San Diego, California, USA). The two-tailed Mann Whitney U-test was used for the comparisons between the patient groups. The two-tailed paired t-test was used for the comparisons within patient groups. p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
When incubated in glucose the mean ACH production by the 44 C. albicans isolates from APECED patients was 53.5 μM (±2.3 μM). The means for the cancer and control isolates were 33.7 μM (±3.5 μM) and 34.6 μM (±1.9 μM), respectively (Fig. 1a). The APECED isolates produced significantly higher amounts of ACH than the cancer isolates (p < 0.0001) and the control isolates (p < 0.0001). The differences between the cancer and the control isolates were not significant. The mean ACH production by the reference strain of C. albicans ATCC 90029 was 38.02 μM ± 2.06 μM in glucose incubation.
When incubated in EtOH the mean ACH production of the APECED isolates was 247.9 μM (±4.2 μM). The means for the cancer and control isolates were 280.2 μM (±11.8 μM) and 299.1 μM (±12.7 μM) (Fig. 1b). The cancer and control isolates produced significantly higher amounts of ACH from EtOH than APECED isolates (p = 0.0072 and p = 0.0003, accordingly). The differences between the cancer and the control isolates were not significant. The mean ACH production by the reference strain of C. albicans ATCC 90029 was 157.43 μM (±1.57 μM) in EtOH incubation. All C. albicans isolates produced significantly more ACH in EtOH than glucose incubation (p = <0.0001).
From 14 APECED patients multiple isolates (2–4 per patient) from years apart were tested. There was no significant difference in the ACH production from EtOH or glucose between the earlier and more recent isolates from 6 patients. There were some differences between the earlier and more recent isolates from 8 patients, mostly when incubated in glucose, but there was no obvious temporal trend nor were the differences significant.
In this study we were able to show that C. albicans isolated from APECED patients produced potentially mutagenic amounts of ACH when incubated in 100 mM glucose. The amount of ACH produced was significantly higher when compared to C. albicans strains isolated from groups of patients with oral cancer or from healthy controls. 100 mM glucose is equivalent to 18 g/L, which can commonly be found in food and drinks.24 Consumption of sweeter products may lead to even higher ACH levels and prolonged exposure. 100 mM glucose has also been shown to increase biofilm formation and adhesion of C. albicans in the oral cavity that may enhance the local mucosal exposure to ACH.24, 25
The mean age at diagnosis of oral cancer in Finland is over 60 years and oral cancer is very uncommon among healthy young adults.26 In APECED patients, however, the mean age at diagnosis is only 37 years.5 The early onset of oral cancer in APECED patients could be partially due to their immune defect and other intrinsic factors. However, both extrinsic and intrinsic factors may operate, and with many of the factors, only long exposure might be carcinogenic. Most APECED patients suffer from refractory oral candidosis since early childhood and the oral carcinoma typically develops at the site of chronic mucositis. This supports the role of C. albicans in the pathogenesis of the carcinoma.5
According to our results all C. albicans isolates analysed were capable of producing carcinogenic levels of ACH from EtOH. The isolates from cancer and control subjects produced significantly higher amounts of ACH than those from APECED patients but the clinical relevance of this difference is questionable since all isolates produced very high amounts. The 11 mM EtOH concentration used can be found in saliva for hours after social alcohol consumption or naturally in many products produced by fermentation.17
The main finding of this study is that C. albicans may play a role in metabolizing glucose to carcinogenic ACH in the mouth and could participate in the pathogenesis of oral cancer in non-alcohol drinkers. The observation supports the concept of a novel microbially mediated mechanism in the pathogenesis of oral cancer and could partly explain why chronic oral candidosis is carcinogenic in APECED patients and why they have a high risk for oral cancer at an early age.
- 1A decade of AIRE. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 645–650., .
- 2APECED mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene. Hum Mutat 2001; 18: 205–211., , , , , , .
- 3The genetic background of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy and its autoimmune disease components. J Mol Med 2002; 80: 201–211., , , , .
- 4Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 2843–2850..
- 5Oral and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma—a complication or component of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED. APS-I). Oral Oncol 2007; 43: 607–613., , , , .
- 6Candida albicans as a promoter of oral mucosal neoplasia. Carcinogenesis 1992; 13: 783–786., .
- 7Oral squamous cell carcinoma in a young person with candidosis endocrinopathy syndrome: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 42–44., , .
- 8Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and oesophageal cancer. Med Mycol 2008; 46: 85–91., , .
- 9Chronic muco-cutaneous candidiasis and oral neoplasia. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: 643–645., .
- 10Epidemiology and prevention of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 1997; 33: 302–312., , , , , .
- 11Alcohol and cancer. Alcohol Alcohol 2004; 39: 155–165., .
- 12Recent advances in Oral Oncology 2007: imaging, treatment and treatment outcomes. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 211–215., .
- 13Acetaldehyde, microbes, and cancer of the digestive tract. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2003; 40: 183–208..
- 14Polyamines stimulate the formation of mutagenic 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts from acetaldehyde. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 3513–3520., , , , .
- 15Increased salivary acetaldehyde levels in heavy drinkers and smokers: a microbiological approach to oral cavity cancer. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21: 663–668., , , , , , , .
- 16High acetaldehyde levels in saliva after ethanol consumption: methodological aspects and pathogenetic implications. Carcinogenesis 1997; 18: 1739–1743., , , , .
- 17Acetaldehyde production from ethanol by oral streptococci. Oral Oncol 2007; 43: 181–186., , , , , , , .
- 18Synergistic effect of alcohol drinking and smoking on in vivo acetaldehyde concentration in saliva. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 480–483., .
- 19Role of yeasts in the salivary acetaldehyde production from ethanol among risk groups for ethanol-associated oral cavity cancer. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 1409–1415., , , , .
- 20High salivary acetaldehyde after a moderate dose of alcohol in ALDH2-deficient subjects: strong evidence for the local carcinogenic action of acetaldehyde. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24: 873–877., , , , .
- 21Alcohol flushing, alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genotypes, and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkes Prev 2003; 12: 1227–1233., , , , , , , , , , , .
- 22Decreased susceptibility of Candida albicans to azole antifungals: a complication of long-term treatment in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 889–892., , , , , .
- 23In vitro acetaldehyde formation by human colonic bacteria. Gut 1994; 35: 1271–1274., , , , .
- 24Biofilm formation of Candida albicans is variably affected by saliva and dietary sugars. Arch Oral Biol 2004; 49: 789–798., , , .
- 25Effects of dietary sugars and, saliva and serum on Candida bioflim formation on acrylic surfaces. Mycopathologia 1997; 139: 87–91., , , , .
- 26Is the incidence of oral and pharyngeal cancer increasing in Finland? An epidemiological study of 17,383 cases in 1953–1999. Oral Dis 2004; 10: 167–172., , , .
Johanna Uittamo, Emilia Siikala, Pertti Kaihovaara, Mikko Salaspuro, Riina Rautemaa.