Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and endometrial cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study
Article first published online: 9 OCT 2008
Copyright © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
International Journal of Cancer
Volume 124, Issue 9, pages 2139–2147, 1 May 2009
How to Cite
Gierach, G. L., Chang, S.-C., Brinton, L. A., Lacey, J. V., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A. and Leitzmann, M. F. (2009), Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and endometrial cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int. J. Cancer, 124: 2139–2147. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24059
- Issue published online: 24 FEB 2009
- Article first published online: 9 OCT 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 SEP 2008
- Manuscript Received: 20 MAY 2008
- National Cancer Institute (Intramural Research Program of the NIH)
- endometrial neoplasms/epidemiology;
- health behavior;
- prospective studies
Consistent with a strong hormonal etiology, endometrial cancer is thought to be influenced by both obesity and physical activity. Although obesity has been consistently related to risk, associations with physical activity have been inconclusive. We examined relationships of activity patterns with endometrial cancer incidence in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort, which included 109,621 women, ages 50–71, without cancer history, who in 1995–1996 completed a mailed baseline questionnaire capturing daily routine and vigorous (defined as any period of ≥20 min of activity at work or home causing increases in breathing, heart rate, or sweating) physical activity. A second questionnaire, completed by 70,351 women, in 1996–1997 collected additional physical activity information. State cancer registry linkage identified 1,052 primary incident endometrial cancers from baseline through December 31, 2003. In multivariate proportional hazards models, vigorous activity was inversely associated with endometrial cancer in a dose-response manner (p for trend = 0.02) (relative risk (RR) for ≥5 times/week vs. never/rarely = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–0.95); this association was more pronounced among overweight and obese women (body mass index ≥25; RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47–0.79) than among lean women (body mass index <25; RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.52–1.10; p for interaction = 0.12). Although we observed no associations with light/moderate, daily routine or occupational physical activities, risk did increase with number of hours of daily sitting (p for trend = 0.02). Associations with vigorous activities, which may interact with body mass index, suggest directions for future research to clarify underlying biologic mechanisms, including those relating to hormonal alterations. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.