SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • NAG-1;
  • GDF15;
  • glioblastoma;
  • DNA methylation

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene, NAG-1, a transforming growth factor-β member, is involved in tumor progression and development. The association between NAG-1 expression and development and progression of glioma has not been well defined. Glioblastoma cell lines have lower basal expression of NAG-1 than other gliomas and normal astrocytes. Most primary human gliomas have very low levels of NAG-1 expression. NAG-1 basal expression appeared to inversely correlate with tumor grade in glioma. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation is a common mechanism for silencing of tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells. In glioblastoma cell lines, NAG-1 expression was increased by the demethylating agent, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. To investigate whether the NAG-1 gene was silenced by hypermethylation in glioblastoma, we examined DNA methylation status using genomic bisulfite sequencing. The NAG-1 promoter was densely methylated in several glioblastoma cell lines as well as in primary oligodendroglioma tumor samples, which have low basal expression of NAG-1. DNA methylation at two specific sites (−53 and +55 CpG sites) in the NAG-1 promoter was strongly associated with low NAG-1 expression. The methylation of the NAG-1 promoter at the −53 site blocks Egr-1 binding and thereby suppresses Nag-1 induction. Treatment of cells with low basal NAG-1 expression with NAG-1 inducer also did not increase NAG-1. Incubation with a demethylation chemical increased Nag-1 basal expression and subsequent incubation with a NAG-1 inducer increased NAG-1 expression. We concluded from these data that methylation of specific promoter sequences causes transcriptional silencing of the NAG-1 locus in glioma and may ultimately contribute to tumor progression.

Gliomas are the most prevalent central nervous system tumor of adults. Approximately 25% of total brain tumors are thought to arise from a glial progenitor cell.1 Glioblastoma (World Health Organization (WHO) Grade IV) has the poorest differentiation of glioma and is the most malignant human brain tumor. The median survival time is 12 months, and 5-year survival rate is <3% despite advances in antitumor therapy.2

Genetic alterations in glioma have been extensively studied, including TP53,3–5PTEN6 and p16 (CDKN2A)/CDK4/Rb alterations,7, 8 loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 19q3, 9 and EGFR amplification.3, 10 Mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene occur in about one-half of all human cancers. TP53 mutations are the first detectable genetic alteration in two-thirds of precursor low-grade diffuse astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas.3–5 Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) also plays a key role in malignant glioma progression. Exogenous expression of TGF-β receptors has been proposed as a therapeutic avenue in glioma.11, 12 Epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification favoring transcriptional silencing, have also emerged as important contributors to tumorigenesis. DNA hypermethylation of promoter DNA at the p16, sFRP1, GATA4, GATA5, O6-MGMT, p73 and TMS1 loci has been reported in multiple cancer types.13 Hypermethylation of TIMP3, EMP3, CST6, BIK and TSPYL5 has been detected in glioblastoma multiforme.14, 15

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1), a divergent member of the TGF-β superfamily, is involved in tumor progression and development.16NAG-1 was mapped to 19p12.1-13.1 and subsequently given various names, including GDF15, MIC-1, PTGF-β, PLAB, PDF and PL74. Previous investigations on the regulation of NAG-1 expression revealed complex mechanisms that can be modulated by multiple cellular stressors, such as acute injury, inflammation, cancer and drugs known to have antitumorigenic, proapoptotic or anti-inflammatory activities.17–20 Many studies showed that the overexpression of NAG-1 in cancer cells results in growth arrest and increases in apoptosis.21 NAG-1 transgenic mice expressing human NAG-1 ubiquitously appear to be less susceptible to genetically or chemically induced intestinal cancer.22 The NAG-1 transgenic mice have significantly suppressed polyp transformation in the small intestine after treatment with azoxymethane or after introduction of mutant APC.23 These findings suggest that NAG-1 may act as a tumor suppressor, but the detailed mechanisms of action of NAG-1 in tumorigenesis have not been elucidated to date.

NAG-1 protein has been detected in the epithelium in the central nervous system and is reported to function as both a neurotrophic and a neuroprotective factor.19, 24 NAG-1 expression is markedly increased in many solid cancers, including prostate, colon, breast, melanoma, pancreatic and thyroid cancer.25, 26 In contrast, our previous study demonstrated that NAG-1 expression in glioblastoma cell lines was significantly lower than in benign glioma cells and normal human astrocytes.27 Strelau et al. also reported that primary glioblastoma have less NAG-1 expression compared to other gliomas.28 This observed decrease in the expression of NAG-1 in glioblastomas suggests modulation of expression—potentially through epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation. Methylated CpG islands have been identified in distinct subgroups of glioma, but analysis of methylated CpG islands was not informative for NAG-1.29 In our report, we asked whether the NAG-1 locus might be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms in glioblastoma. Our data implicate DNA methylation and accompanying transcriptional silencing as a mechanism coupling NAG-1 expression to tumor growth characteristics in glioma.

Material and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Cell Culture and Reagents

The glioblastoma multiforme cell lines T98G, U118MG, U138MG, U373, U87MG and A172, the glioma cell line Hs683 and the low-grade astrocytoma cell line SW1088 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The NHA cell line was obtained from Clonetics (San Diego, CA). All glioblastoma cells and Hs683 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, containing 4.5 g/l D-glucose and L-glutamine from Gibco (Grand Island, NY) and supplemented with 1 mM MEM sodium pyruvate solution (Gibco), 10 μg/ml gentamicin (Gibco) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. The SW1088 and NHA cells were maintained in AGM Bullet Kit from Lonza (Walkersville, MD). 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AZA-dC) and trichostatin A (TSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and were dissolved in 0.1% Me2SO (DMSO). Sulindac sulfide (SS) was purchased from Sigma and was dissolved in ethanol. Antibodies were from the following sources: anti-β-actin (1:2,000 dilution) was from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). NAG-1 polyclonal rabbit antibody (1:1,500 dilution) was generated in this laboratory.21 Anti-Egr-1 (sc-110X) and normal rabbit IgG (sc-2027) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).

Primary glioma tumor samples

All primary tumor samples used for this study were derived from snap-frozen surgical tissue samples from the Midwestern division of the cooperative human tissue network, USA.

Western blot analysis

Total cell lysates from cultured cells and primary tumor samples were isolated in RIPA buffer with Complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablets from Roche (Indianapolis, IN), sonicated briefly and quantitated by BCA assay from Pierce (Rockfold, IL). Thirty micrograms of total protein per lane was separated by SDS-PAGE 4–12% Bis–Tris gel from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen). The blots were blocked for 1 hr in 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T; Sigma-Aldrich) and probed overnight at 4°C in 5% skim milk in TBS-T with each primary antibody. After washing with TBS-T, the blots were incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hr at room temperature in 3% skim milk in TBS-T, washed several times in TBS-T and detected by the Amersham ECL plus Western blot detection system from GE Healthcare (UK).

ELISA analysis

To examine Nag-1 levels in the cell culture media, we used the human GDF-15 Duo Set ELISA Development kit from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, an ELISA plate was coated with 2.0 μg/ml of monoclonal anti-human GDF-15 capture antibody. Then, various concentrations of standard recombinant GDF-15 and samples added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 2 hr at room temperature. After the plate was washed, 50 ng/ml of biotinylated goat GDF-15 antibody was incubated for 2 hr at room temperature. Finally, streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase was added, and the optical density of each well was determined using a microplate reader set to 450 nm.

Isolation and reverse transcription

Total RNAs from cultured cells and primary tumor samples were isolated with QIAshredder and RNeasy MINI kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. One microgram of RNA was treated with 1 U of DNase I Amplification Grade (Invitrogen) at room temperature for 15 min to remove genomic DNA and followed by inactivation with 2.5 mM EDTA (Invitrogen) at 65°C for 5 min. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed with Super Script II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA was stored at −20°C until use.

Real-time RT-PCR

Real-time PCR assays were performed using the iQ5 and MyiQ Real PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Real-time RT-PCR fluorescence detection was performed in 96-well plates with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Amplification primers were 5′-TGCCCGCCAGCTACAATC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCTTTGGCTAACAAGTCATCATAGGT-3′ (reverse) for NAG-1 gene, and 5′-CCTGGCACCCAGCACAAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCGGATCCACACGGAGTACT-3′ (reverse) for β-actin. The threshold cycle number (CT) for same amount of cDNA of each sample was determined in triplicate. The copy number for NAG-1 was calculated from the CT value. All the results represent means ± SD of three independent experiments.

DNA extraction and bisulfite genomic sequencing PCR

Total genomic DNA from cultured cells and primary tumor samples were isolated with DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Bisulfite modification was done using the EZ DNA methylation Gold Kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer's instructions. Bisulfite sequencing PCR primers were designed with the Web software program EpiDesigner (http://www.epidesigner.com/). The sequences of the bisulfite sequencing PCR primers were 5′-AAGAGGATATTGAGGTTTAGAAATGTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-AATCTTCCCAACTCTAATTAACCC-3′ (reverse). This primer set was used to amplify the CpG island around the transcription start site of the NAG-1 gene (−217 to +258) in the promoter region with an expected 465-bp product. PCR reactions were done with Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The PCR products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel, purified with a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), cloned with TOPO XL PCR Cloning kits (Invitrogen) and sequenced with an ABI 3100 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (Chip) assay was performed using the Chip assay kit from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, T98G and U118MG cells (3 × 106) in the 10-cm dish were treated with 30 μM SS or control (0.1% Me2SO) for 4 hr and then fixed by the addition of 1% formaldehyde to media for 5 min at 37°C. The fixed cells were scraped into conical tubes, pelleted and lysed in SDS lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor (Roche and Sigma). DNA was sheared to fragments of 200–800 bp by sonication ten times for 30 sec. The sonicated cell supernatant was diluted tenfold in the Chip dilution buffer. The chromatin was precleared with salmon sperm DNA/protein A-agarose slurry for 1 hr at 4°C. The precleared supernatant was incubated with antibodies against Egr-1 (sc-110) or normal rabbit IgG overnight at 4°C. The immunocomplexes were eluted with elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3). NaCl (5 M) was added into eluted samples to reverse histone–DNA crosslinks, and the samples were heated overnight at 65°C. Then, DNAs were purified and analyzed by quantitative PCR, using primers specific to sequences at the NAG-1 promoter, i.e., 5′-CAGCTGTGGTCATTGGAGTG-3′ and 5′-GAGCTGGGACTGACCAGATG-3′ for Sp-1-binding site BC.

Plasmid transfection

The NAG-1 expression vector (pcDNA3-NAG-1) was described previously.21 U87MG cells were seeded in six-well plates at 30 × 104 cells per well in DMEM and grown to 60% confluence. One microgram of pcDNA3-NAG-1 or pcDNA3.1 (empty vector for expression control) was transfected using FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 24-hr transfection, the efficiency of transfection was confirmed by Western blot and ELISA.

Flow cytometry

After transfection of pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3-NAG-1, the cells were incubated with serum-free media for 5 days. Cells were trypsinized and harvested by centrifugation. Pellets were washed with PBS, resuspended in PBS containing 10 mg/ml propidium iodide (Roche) and 0.5 mg/ml RNase (Roche) and stored overnight at 4°C. Stained cells were analyzed using a Becton Dickinson FACSort (Franklin Lakes, NJ) as per manufacturer's instructions. The fraction of sub G1 cells in the population was determined using CellQuest 3.1 software (Becton Dickinson Flowcytometry System).

Colony formation in soft agar assay

After transfection of pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3-NAG-1, the U87 cells were trypsinized and resuspended at 2 × 103 cells in 1 ml of 0.35% agar solution in growth media and then layered on top of a 0.7% agar layer in six-well plates. Plates were incubated for 2 weeks at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cell colonies were visualized following an overnight stain with 0.5 ml of 0.025% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) and examined microscopically. These were represented as mean colony number examined in five randomly chosen microscope fields.

Statistical analysis

All statistical differences between experimental groups were evaluated by the two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

NAG-1 basal expression in glioma cells and primary tumors

The basal expression of Nag-1 in several glioma cell lines, normal human astrocytes and several primary glioma samples were determined at both the mRNA and protein levels. The basal expression of NAG-1 proprotein was very low in all glioblastoma cell lines except in A172. In contrast, low-grade glioma cell lines, such as Hs683 and SW1088, and normal human astrocytes exhibited higher levels of NAG-1 proprotein (Fig. 1a). NAG-1 proprotein is cleaved and secreted into the media as a mature dimer. Thus, the secreted form was measured in cell media to further analyze total NAG-1 formation. The basal expression of secreted NAG-1 protein in media was also very low in high-grade glioblastoma cell lines (U118, U138 and U373, Fig. 1b). A higher secreted NAG-1 was observed in T98G and A172 cells. In the low-grade cell lines and in the normal human astrocytes, high levels of the secreted protein were observed. Thus, in cultured cell lines, the high-grade glioblastomas express NAG-1 poorly.

thumbnail image

Figure 1. NAG-1 basal expression in glioma cells, NHA cells and primary tumor samples. (a) Western blot analysis depicts the expression of β-actin and NAG-1 protein basal levels. (b) ELISA analysis depicts secret NAG-1 protein concentration in growth media of cell culture. Secret NAG-1 concentration was normalized by total protein concentration. (c) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis shows the basal level of NAG-1 mRNA reported as copy number. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint

We next measured NAG-1 protein levels in primary tumor samples. The basal expression of NAG-1 proprotein in all glioma samples was very low with a single exception (tumor 3, Fig. 1a). Further, NAG-1 expression was remarkably low in oligodendrogliomas (WHO Grade II) (tumor 10 to tumor 12, Fig. 1a). To confirm the low expression of NAG-1 in high-grade glioma, we measured the mRNA copy number. The expression was the lowest in the high-grade glioblastoma cell lines and glioma, whereas higher basal expression was observed in the low-grade or normal cell lines. This data suggest that the basal expression of NAG-1 is suppressed in higher grade glioma.

Methylation status of NAG-1 in glioma cell lines and primary tumors

The methylation status of CpG sites of the NAG-1 promoter (−162 to +55) (Table 1) and the intragenic CpG island (+97 to +234) (Supporting Information Table 1) was determined by bisulfite sequencing of genomic DNA isolated from the cell lines and primary tumors. In U118 and U138, the CpG sites of NAG-1 promoter were uniformly methylated. CpG dinucleotides at two sites (−53 and +55) of the NAG-1 promoter were more frequently methylated in the cells with low NAG-1 expression (U118, U138, U373 and U87) than in cells with moderate to high expression of NAG-1. The CpG site at position −53 of the NAG-1 promoter is Sp-1-binding site C, one of the pivotal sites regulating basal expression and is also critical to activated expression of the locus mediated by Egr-1.30 The CpG site at position +55 is very close to a putative p53-binding site that may also regulate NAG-1 expression.30 No correlation of DNA methylation status in the intragenic CpG island with expression was observed (Supporting Information Table). These results indicate that hypermethylation correlates with the low expression of NAG-1 in glioblastoma cell lines.

Table 1. Methylation status of NAG-1 promoter in glioma cells, NHA cells and primary tumor samples
inline image

Hypermethylation status was then measured in human glioblastoma samples. In primary glioblastoma (tumor 1 to tumor 8), these sites were less methylated than the corresponding site in glioblastoma cell lines, as expected. In anaplastic oligodendroglioma (WHO Grade III) (tumor 9) and oligodendroglioma (tumor 10 to tumor 12), CpG sites −118, −53, +17 and +55 of NAG-1 promoter were frequently methylated. The CpG site at position −118 of the NAG-1 promoter is Sp-1-binding site A, also a pivotal Sp-1-binding site. TSA induction of NAG-1 expression is dependent on Sp-1-binding site A and Sp-1-binding site C.27

In cell lines and primary tumor samples, the CpG island of the NAG-1 gene was evenly methylated. This methylation was limited to the +176 to +234 positions in normal human astrocytes. We concluded from these experiments that the suppression of NAG-1 expression is associated with DNA methylation of specific sites in the NAG-1 promoter.

Treatment with DNA demethylation agent induces NAG-1 expression

Epigenetic repression of tumor suppressor genes by DNA methylation and histone modification often disrupts differentiation of epithelial and hematopoietic cells and can promote cancer progression.31 Previously, we investigated the effect of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, TSA on NAG-1 regulation in glioma cells. TSA induced NAG-1 expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels in T98G glioblastoma cells. However, we did not observe the induction of NAG-1 by TSA in U87, U118, U138 and U373 glioblastoma cells, whose basal expression of NAG-1 was low27 and promoter hypermethylated. To investigate if the low response was due to hypermethylated promoter, U87, U118, U138 and U373 cells were treated with the DNA demethylation agent, 5-AZA-dC, and then basal NAG-1 expression was measured. The protein (Fig. 2a) expression of NAG-1 was significantly induced by 5-AZA-dC in three of four cell lines examined (U87, U118 and U373). Note that the exposure time on Figure 2a was longer than Figure 1a. We next measured the mRNA expression after incubation with 5AZA-dC or vehicle. Treatment with the demethylation drug increased the expression of NAG-1 mRNA in all cells tested except U138 with expression too low to accurately measure (Fig. 2b).

thumbnail image

Figure 2. DNA demethylation agent, 5-AZA-dC, induces NAG-1 expression in glioblastoma cells. (a) NAG-1 protein levels as determined by Western blot analysis. (b) NAG-1 mRNA levels as determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. U87, U118, U138 and U373 cells were treated with vehicle (white bar) or 1 μM 5-AZA-dC (black bar) in serum-containing media for 48 hr. β-Actin is a control for the amount of protein loaded. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Sulindac sulfide treatment in different methylation status cell lines

The cyclooxygenase inhibitor is a potent inducer of NAG-1 mediated by the induction of Egr-1 that binds to Sp/Egr1 site in the NAG promoter. Methylation of this region may block the induction of NAG-1 by sulindac sulfide (SS). To test this hypothesis, T98G (lower methylation status) and U118 cells that have high methylation level were incubated with SS. The T98G cells that have a hypomethylated promoter showed good induction of NAG-1 protein by SS (Fig. 3a). In contrast, U118 cells that have a hypermethylated promoter showed poor induction of NAG-1 protein. We also measured secreted NAG-1 protein in medium at different time points after treatment (Fig. 3b). The T98G cells also showed significant induction of NAG-1, but the U118 cells showed very low expression.

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Hypermethylation prevents Nag-1 expression in glioblastoma cells. (a) Western blot analysis depicts the expression of β-actin and NAG-1 protein. β-Actin is a control for the amount of protein loaded. (b) ELISA analysis depicts secret NAG-1 protein concentration in growth media of cell culture at different time points as indicated. Secret NAG-1 concentration was normalized by total protein concentration. T98G and U118 cells were treated with vehicle or 30 μM SS in serum-free media. (c) ELISA analysis depicts secret NAG-1 protein concentration in growth media of cell culture. Secret NAG-1 concentration was normalized by total protein concentration. T98G and U118 cells were pretreated with or without 5-AZA-dC in serum-containing media for 5 days and then treated with vehicle, 30 μM SS or 500 ng/ml TSA in serum-free media for 24 hr. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. p-values derived from Student's t-test are *p < 0.01 and **p < 0.05.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Effects of combination treatment of 5-AZA-dC with SS or TSA

Following pretreatment for 5 days with 5-AZA-dC, T98G and U118 cells were passaged, starved overnight with serum-free medium and subsequently treated with vehicle, SS or TSA in serum-free medium for 24 hr, and the mature Nag-1 dimer was measured in the media. In T98G cells, pretreatment with 5-AZA-dC did not alter the respond to either NSAIDS (SS) or TSA. In contrast, in U118 cells, pretreatment with 5-AZA-dC significantly increased basal Nag-1 protein expression and increased the respond to both drugs (Fig. 3c). These results suggest that methylation of the NAG-1 promoter in glioblastoma cell lines prevents the NSAID-induced increases in Nag-1 protein observed in cells lacking promoter methylation.

Hypermethylation blocks Egr-1 binding to Nag-1 promoter

SS mediates increases in NAG-1 expression by an increase in Egr-1 expression. Egr-1 then binds to the Sp1/Egr-1 sites in the NAG-1 promoter, stimulating gene expression. SS induced Egr-1 mRNA expression in T98G and U118 cells (Fig. 4a) with the peak mRNA expression observed at 2 hr after treatment in both cell lines. We suspected that hypermethylation in the Sp-1/Egr-1 site would block Egr-1 binding to Nag-1 promoter. To test this hypothesis, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was used to determine whether Egr-1 protein is bound to the NAG-1 promoter. T98G and U118 cells were treated with SS or vehicle for 4 hr. Subsequently, the Egr-1 protein and DNA complex were measured. SS treatment induced an approximately twofold increase in bound Egr-1 in T98G cells, but there was no increase in U118 cells (Fig. 4b). To confirm whether demethylation increases Egr-1 binding to NAG-1 promoter, following pretreatment for 5 days with 5-AZA-dC, T98G and U118 cells were passaged, starved overnight with serum-free medium and subsequently treated with SS or vehicle in serum-free medium for 4 hr, and then Egr-1 and DNA complex were measured. T98G showed about 2.5-fold increase and U118 showed about twofold increase by SS (Fig. 4c). Following treatment for 5 days with 5-AZA-dC, CpG sites −67, −53 and +55 of Nag-1 promoter were surely demethylated in U118 cell, which was confirmed by bisulfate sequencing of genomic DNA (Supporting Information Table 2). Taken together, these findings indicate that hypermethylation blocks Egr-1 binding to Nag-1 promoter and, therefore, suppresses the Nag-1 induction.

thumbnail image

Figure 4. Hypermethylation blocks Egr-1 binding to Nag-1 promoter. (a) Egr-1 mRNA levels as determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis. T98G and U118 cells were treated with vehicle or 30 μM SS at different time points as indicated. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. (b) The Egr-1-binding region amplified by the specific PCR primers in Chip assays is indicated. T98G and U118 cells were treated with vehicle or 30 μM SS for 4 hr, and the Egr-1 protein and target DNA complex were examined by Chip and quantitative real-time PCR. (c) Cells were pretreated with 5-AZA-dC for 5 days, passaged, starved overnight, treated with 30 μM SS for 4 hr and then examined by the Chip assay. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. p-value derived from Student's t-test is *p < 0.01.

Download figure to PowerPoint

NAG-1 expression and apoptosis in glioma cells

NAG-1 expression is associated with cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis in a number of cells, but this has not been studied in glioblastomas. Furthermore, we wondered if the expression of NAG-1 in glioma having a hypermethylated promoter would response to NAG-1 expression. The effect of NAG-1 overexpression was examined in several glioblastoma cell lines that have highly methylated promoters and hence low basal expression of NAG-1 (U87, U118, U138 and U373 cells). Each cell line was transfected with NAG-1 expression plasmid, and the NAG-1 expression was confirmed by Western blot for the proform (Fig. 5a) and ELISA assay for the secreted NAG-1 (Fig. 5b). NAG-1 proteins in both cell lysates and growth media in all cells were highly expressed in the transfected cells. Subsequently, cells were incubated with serum-free medium for 5 days, and then cell cycle was measured by flow cytometry. NAG-1 overexpression significantly increased the proportion of apoptotic cells as measured by the sub-G1 population in U87, U118 and U373 (Fig. 5c). Thus, NAG-1 expression has a proapoptotic effect in glioblastoma cells that have low basal expression of NAG-1. Because NAG-1 acts as a tumor suppressor, we next examined whether NAG-1 expression would inhibit the growth of glioblastomas on soft agar. U87 cells transfected with vector control or NAG-1 expression construct were grown in soft agar and colony formation measured. The expression of NAG-1 inhibited cell growth by ∼50% (Fig. 5d). These findings support the hypothesis that NAG-1 appears to act as a tumor suppressor gene in glioblastomas but is epigenetically silenced in high-grade tumors.

thumbnail image

Figure 5. NAG-1 overexpression increased apoptosis in glioblastoma cells. (a) NAG-1 protein levels in cell lysates (a) and secret NAG-1 protein levels in growth media (b) after transfection as determined by Western blot analysis and ELISA. U87, U118, U138 and U373 cells were transfected with pcDNA3 (white bar) or pcDNA3-NAG-1 (black bar) for 24 hr and then measured. β-Actin is a control for the amount of protein loaded. Secret NAG-1 concentration was normalized by total protein concentration. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SD of three independent transfections. (c) The population of apoptotic cells by flow cytometry. After transfection for 24 hr, cells were incubated with serum-free media for 5 days. The values shown in the graph are the mean ± SD of three independent transfections. p-values derived from Student's t-test are **p < 0.01 and < *p < 0.05. (d) Alteration of NAG-1 expression with NAG-1 overexpression plasmid affects soft agar growth. U87 cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3-NAG-1 for 24 hr, resuspended and then grown for 2 weeks in soft agar. The bar graphs represent mean ± SD of colony number in five randomly chosen microscope fields. **p < 0.01, significant differences.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Gliomas are the most common central nervous system tumor in both adults and children. Although in vivo and in vitro studies have shed new light on the mechanism of tumorigenesis of neuroepithelial tumors, current treatments do not result in an improvement in the very poor prognosis of this disease. However, epigenetic studies have indicated possible strategies for tumor-specific and customized therapy.32–35 The restoration of silenced tumor suppressor genes is an attractive therapeutic approach that could result in improvements in prognosis.

In a previous study,27 we have investigated epigenetic modifications, including histone deacetylation and DNA methylation, ultimately identifying the NAG-1 gene as being epigenetically regulated and possibly silenced in gliomas. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, TSA, induces NAG-1 expression in several glioma cell lines including T98G cells. TSA induces apoptosis in T98G cells, and the increase in expression of NAG-1 plays an important role in TSA-mediated apoptosis, suggesting histone acetylation regulates the expression of NAG-1. However, 5-AZA-dC did not induce NAG-1 expression in T98G cells, suggesting methylation was not important in regulation of NAG-1 expression in these cells. In our report, we examined in more detail the methylation status of the NAG-1 promoter in glioblastoma cells and in human glioma tumors. The promoter region of NAG-1 was poorly methylated in cells that have high basal expression of NAG-1 and hypermethylated in cells that have low basal expression of NAG-1. In glioblastoma cell lines, an inverse relationship between the basal expression and promoter hypermethylation is clearly apparent with hypermethylation observed in the high-grade cells. The study of methylation status and basal NAG-1 expression was continued by examination of the basal NAG-1 expression and promoter methylation in human glioma samples. In general, we observed a very low basal NAG-1 expression in the tumors and a high level of promoter methylation. 5-AZA-dC induced NAG-1 expression in glioblastoma cell lines with low basal expression of NAG-1 and a highly methylated promoter but was not effective in cells like T98G that have high basal expression and a poorly methylated NAG-1 promoter. Thus, we conclude that NAG-1 is epigenetically regulated and silenced in glioblastomas by methylation.

In the human tumor samples, the relationship between hypermethylation and basal NAG-1 expression is not as clear. In cell lines where the NAG-1 promoter is extensively methylated, clusters of DNA methylation were identified that correlate with known transcription factor-binding sites responsible for the regulation of basal expression. NAG-1 expression is downregulated in greater than 90% of the tumors. However, hypermethylation at the sites identified in cell lines (the −118 to −53 regions) was not observed in all human glioblastoma samples. Our observation is similar to results reported for methylation of other genes in glioblastoma.36 As previously suggested,36 the decreased levels of methylation observed in tumors versus cell lines may reflect differences in cellularity (tumors have multiple cell types), differences in the signaling environment in vivoversus in culture or that DNA methylation in cell lines may reflect a growth advantage in culture not evident in tumors.

NAG-1 expression is regulated by several transcriptional factors and post-transcriptional mechanisms, indicating a diverse regulation by antitumorigenic compounds. From our studies on the regulation of NAG-1 expression by tumor prevention drugs, it was revealed that NAG-1 is an important downstream target of three tumor suppressor pathways, p53,30 Egr-137 and AKT/GSK-3β.38 These pathways involve specific sites located in the −133 to +55 region of NAG-1 promoter, which we analyzed for the methylation status. The Egr-1/Sp-1-binding site (−67 and −53, respectively) regions are pivotal regulation sites for increasing NAG-1 expression by COX inhibitors, troglitazone and TSA. In addition, these sites are critical in the regulation of the basal expression of NAG-1.23 Our study indicated that Egr-1/Sp-1-binding site was highly methylated in glioblastoma cell lines and primary oligodendroglioma samples that have low basal expression of NAG-1. In addition, our methylation status assay showed that +55 region located close to p53-binding site was also highly methylated. The p53 sites play an important role in the regulation of NAG-1 expression and are pivotal in induction of NAG-1 expression by dietary compounds, for example, DADS and resveratrol.30, 39 Thus, the −128 to −53 region and +55 region of NAG-1 promoter are likely involved in silencing of the tumor suppressor gene in tumorigenesis of glioma.

Methylation of the Egr-1/SP-1 site not only decreases the basal expression of NAG-1 but also prevents an increase in expression after treatment with SS or TSA. SS increased NAG-1 expression in T98G cells with a poorly methylated NAG-1 promoter, whereas treatment of U-118 cells that have a highly methylated promoter did not increase NAG-1 expression. After removal of the methyl group by 5-AZA-dC treatment, SS increased NAG-1 expression in the U-118 cells. Although SS increased in both the T98G and U-118 cells the expression of Egr-1, a transcription factor required for the increase in transcriptional activity by SS, the binding of Egr-1 to the promoter site was blocked on the methylated promoter in U-118 cells as determined by the Chip assay. Thus, in glioma, hypermethylation of NAG-1 promoter silenced basal expression and blocked drug-induced expression, a finding that may provide insight into why gliomas are resistant to many drug therapies.

The role for NAG-1 in development of tumors is highly complex. Studies in a number of tumor cells, colorectal,21 breast18 and now glioblastoma all indicate that the expression of NAG-1 induced apoptosis, inhibited the growth on soft agar and altered the cell cycle. Other studies in nude mice show that the expression of NAG-1 inhibits the growth of tumors in xenographs.21 NAG-1 transgenic mice expressing the human NAG-1 are resistant to both chemical and genetically induced intestinal tumors.22 Our current studies support the hypothesis that NAG-1 is a potential tumor suppressor gene and results of this investigation confirm that its expression can be regulated by gene hypermethylation in glioblastoma. Further studies are needed to determine whether NAG-1 transgenic mice are resistant to development of glioblastoma and if hypermethylation silences NAG-1 expression in other cancers.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information
  • 1
    Mischel PS, Cloughesy TF, Nelson SF. DNA-microarray analysis of brain cancer: molecular classification for therapy. Nat Rev 2004; 5: 78292.
  • 2
    Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2005; 109: 93108.
  • 3
    Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre PL, Burkhard C, Schuler D, Probst-Hensch NM, Maiorka PC, Baeza N, Pisani P, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 68929.
  • 4
    Watanabe K, Sato K, Biernat W, Tachibana O, von Ammon K, Ogata N, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Incidence and timing of p53 mutations during astrocytoma progression in patients with multiple biopsies. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 52330.
  • 5
    Watanabe K, Tachibana O, Sata K, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Overexpression of the EGF receptor and p53 mutations are mutually exclusive in the evolution of primary and secondary glioblastomas. Brain Pathol 1996; 6: 21723; discussion 23–4.
  • 6
    Dahia PL. PTEN, a unique tumor suppressor gene. Endocr Relat Cancer 2000; 7: 11529.
  • 7
    Nakamura M, Sakaki T, Hashimoto H, Nakase H, Ishida E, Shimada K, Konishi N. Frequent alterations of the p14(ARF) and p16(INK4a) genes in primary central nervous system lymphomas. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 63359.
  • 8
    Nakamura M, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Promoter hypermethylation of the RB1 gene in glioblastomas. Lab Invest 2001; 81: 7782.
  • 9
    Ohgaki H, Schauble B, zur Hausen A, von Ammon K, Kleihues P. Genetic alterations associated with the evolution and progression of astrocytic brain tumours. Virchows Arch 1995; 427: 11318.
  • 10
    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008; 455: 10618.
  • 11
    Jennings MT, Pietenpol JA. The role of transforming growth factor beta in glioma progression. J Neurooncol 1998; 36: 12340.
  • 12
    Naumann U, Maass P, Gleske AK, Aulwurm S, Weller M, Eisele G. Glioma gene therapy with soluble transforming growth factor-beta receptors II and III. Int J Oncol 2008; 33: 75965.
  • 13
    Kondo Y, Issa JP. Epigenetic changes in colorectal cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2004; 23: 2939.
  • 14
    Kim TY, Zhong S, Fields CR, Kim JH, Robertson KD. Epigenomic profiling reveals novel and frequent targets of aberrant DNA methylation-mediated silencing in malignant glioma. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7490501.
  • 15
    Yi JM, Tsai HC, Glockner SC, Lin S, Ohm JE, Easwaran H, James CD, Costello JF, Riggins G, Eberhart CG, Laterra J, Vescovi AL, et al. Abnormal DNA methylation of CD133 in colorectal and glioblastoma tumors. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 8094103.
  • 16
    Tso CL, Freije WA, Day A, Chen Z, Merriman B, Perlina A, Lee Y, Dia EQ, Yoshimoto K, Mischel PS, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, et al. Distinct transcription profiles of primary and secondary glioblastoma subgroups. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 15967.
  • 17
    Fairlie WD, Moore AG, Bauskin AR, Russell PK, Zhang HP, Breit SN. MIC-1 is a novel TGF-beta superfamily cytokine associated with macrophage activation. J Leukoc Biol 1999; 65: 25.
  • 18
    Martinez JM, Sali T, Okazaki R, Anna C, Hollingshead M, Hose C, Monks A, Walker NJ, Baek SJ, Eling TE. Drug-induced expression of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1/prostate-derived factor, a putative tumor suppressor, inhibits tumor growth. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 318: 899906.
  • 19
    Schober A, Bottner M, Strelau J, Kinscherf R, Bonaterra GA, Barth M, Schilling L, Fairlie WD, Breit SN, Unsicker K. Expression of growth differentiation factor-15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (GDF-15/MIC-1) in the perinatal, adult, and injured rat brain. J Comp Neurol 2001; 439: 3245.
  • 20
    Welsh JB, Sapinoso LM, Kern SG, Brown DA, Liu T, Bauskin AR, Ward RL, Hawkins NJ, Quinn DI, Russell PJ, Sutherland RL, Breit SN, et al. Large-scale delineation of secreted protein biomarkers overexpressed in cancer tissue and serum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 341015.
  • 21
    Baek SJ, Kim KS, Nixon JB, Wilson LC, Eling TE. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors regulate the expression of a TGF-beta superfamily member that has proapoptotic and antitumorigenic activities. Mol Pharmacol 2001; 59: 9018.
  • 22
    Baek SJ, Okazaki R, Lee SH, Martinez J, Kim JS, Yamaguchi K, Mishina Y, Martin DW, Shoieb A, McEntee MF, Eling TE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene-1 over expression in transgenic mice suppresses intestinal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 155360.
  • 23
    Baek SJ, Eling TE. Changes in gene expression contribute to cancer prevention by COX inhibitors. Prog Lipid Res 2006; 45: 116.
  • 24
    Strelau J, Sullivan A, Bottner M, Lingor P, Falkenstein E, Suter-Crazzolara C, Galter D, Jaszai J, Krieglstein K, Unsicker K. Growth/differentiation factor-15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 is a novel trophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons in vivo. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 8597603.
  • 25
    Koopmann J, Buckhaults P, Brown DA, Zahurak ML, Sato N, Fukushima N, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH, Breit SN, Kinzler KW, et al. Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 as a marker of pancreatic and other periampullary cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 238692.
  • 26
    Liu T, Bauskin AR, Zaunders J, Brown DA, Pankhurst S, Russell PJ, Breit SN. Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 reduces cell adhesion and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 503440.
  • 27
    Yoshioka H, Kamitani H, Watanabe T, Eling TE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1/GDF15) expression is increased by the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 3312937.
  • 28
    Strelau J, Schmeer C, Peterziel H, Sackmann T, Herold-Mende C, Steiner H, Weller M, Unsicker K. Expression and putative functions of GDF-15, a member of the TGF-beta superfamily, in human glioma and glioblastoma cell lines. Cancer Lett 2008; 270: 309.
  • 29
    Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 2010; 17: 51022.
  • 30
    Baek SJ, Wilson LC, Eling TE. Resveratrol enhances the expression of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1) by increasing the expression of p53. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23: 42534.
  • 31
    Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3: 41528.
  • 32
    Grothey A, Ellis LM. Targeting angiogenesis driven by vascular endothelial growth factors using antibody-based therapies. Cancer J 2008; 14: 1707.
  • 33
    Maity A, Bernhard EJ. Modulating tumor vasculature through signaling inhibition to improve cytotoxic therapy. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 21415.
  • 34
    Rath P, Shi H, Maruniak JA, Litofsky NS, Maria BL, Kirk MD. Stem cells as vectors to deliver HSV/tk gene therapy for malignant gliomas. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2009; 4: 449.
  • 35
    Witt O, Schweigerer L, Driever PH, Wolff J, Pekrun A. Valproic acid treatment of glioblastoma multiforme in a child. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004; 43: 181.
  • 36
    Stone AR, Bobo W, Brat DJ, Devi NS, Van Meir EG, Vertino PM. Aberrant methylation and down-regulation of TMS1/ASC in human glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 2004; 165: 115161.
  • 37
    Baek SJ, Kim JS, Nixon JB, DiAugustine RP, Eling TE. Expression of NAG-1, a transforming growth factor-beta superfamily member, by troglitazone requires the early growth response gene EGR-1. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 688392.
  • 38
    Yamaguchi K, Lee SH, Eling TE, Baek SJ. Identification of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1) as a novel downstream target of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/GSK-3beta pathway. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 4961723.
  • 39
    Bottone FG, Jr, Baek SJ, Nixon JB, Eling TE. Diallyl disulfide (DADS) induces the antitumorigenic NSAID-activated gene (NAG-1) by a p53-dependent mechanism in human colorectal HCT 116 cells. J Nutr 2002; 132: 7738.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Material and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  7. Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
IJC_26082_sm_suppinfo.pdf103KSupporting Information

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.