Tel.: +1 314-362-8599, Fax: +1 314-747-5191
Early Detection and Diagnosis
Preclinical evaluation of Mab CC188 for ovarian cancer imaging
Version of Record online: 11 JAN 2012
Copyright © 2011 UICC
International Journal of Cancer
Volume 131, Issue 6, pages 1351–1359, 15 September 2012
How to Cite
Xu, M., Rettig, M.P., Sudlow, G., Wang, B., Akers, W.J., Cao, D., Mutch, D.G., DiPersio, J.F. and Achilefu, S. (2012), Preclinical evaluation of Mab CC188 for ovarian cancer imaging. Int. J. Cancer, 131: 1351–1359. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27380
- Issue online: 20 JUL 2012
- Version of Record online: 11 JAN 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 30 NOV 2011 09:57AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 8 NOV 2011
- Manuscript Received: 19 APR 2011
- US National Institutes of Health. Grant Numbers: R01 EB008111, R01 EB 008458
- GCF (Gynecologic Cancer Foundation/Gail MacNeil KOH Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer research grant)
- monoclonal antibody;
- cancer stem cell;
- ovarian cancer;
- optical imaging
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been successfully isolated from solid tumors and are believed to be initiating cells of primary, metastatic and recurrent tumors. Imaging and therapeutic reagents targeted to CSCs have potential to detect subclinical tumors and completely eradicate the disease. Previously, we have demonstrated that Mab CC188 binds to colon cancer CD133- and CD133+ (CSCs) cells. In this study, we examined the reactivity of Mab CC188 to ovarian cancer cells including CD133+ cells and primary tumor tissues using immunofluorescence staining methods and tissue microarray technique. We also explored the feasibility of using NIR dye-labeled Mab CC188 probe to image ovarian tumors in vivo. Mab CC188 stains both CD133- and CD133+ cells of ovarian cancer. Tissue microarray analysis reveals that 75% (92/123) of ovarian cancer cases are positively stained with Mab CC188. Weak positive (±), positive (+), strong positive (++) and very strong positive (+++) stains are 14.8, 3.7, 11 and 24.4%, respectively. In contrast, Mab CC188 staining is low in normal cells and tissues. In vivo study show that significant amounts of the probe accumulates in the excretion organs in the early period postinjection. At 24 hr, the imaging probes have largely accumulates in the tumor, while the intensity of the imaging probe decreases in the liver. The tumor uptake was still evident at 120-hr postinjection. Our work suggests that Mab CC188-based imaging and therapeutic reagents are capable of detecting early stage ovarian tumors and effectively treating the tumor.
Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, the death rate for ovarian cancer has not changed much in the last 50 years.1 Ultimately 21,000 women will be diagnosed with this disease and 14,000 women will die from it this year in the United States.2 The high mortality rate is partially due to the late stage at diagnosis. More than 80% of the patients present at either Stage III or IV necessitating aggressive treatment regimens such as systemic chemotherapy.3, 4 In these patients the 5-year survival rate is only about 33%.5 Thus, the high mortality rate at least partially reflects the lack of sensitive and accurate methods for detecting asymptomatic early stage ovarian tumors when survival might be significantly higher.5, 6 In addition, accurate methods for monitoring the tumor therapeutic response and recurrence post treatment are lacking.7
In the fight against this devastating disease, tumor circulating markers such as CA-125 and HE4 have been intensively investigated in the clinic to identify and monitor the progression of ovarian cancer. These are particularly useful for monitoring tumor therapeutic response and in detecting recurrence post treatment.8–11 Although studies have revealed that CA-125 is not tumor specific,12–14 using the strategy of combining multiple serum tumor markers may facilitate the detection of early stage tumors and more accurately predict tumor recurrence.15–18 Unfortunately, the measurement of serum tumor biological markers cannot be used to assess disease site or volume, which is important in treatment planning.19 Recent studies have shown that functional imaging with [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDGPET/CT), may be a more sensitive tool to detect the metabolic activity of tumors, but this method is often unable to identify quiescent (dormant) cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are more aggressive and resistant to therapeutic treatment.2, 19
In recent years, CSCs have been isolated from solid tumors and hypothesized to be the initiating cells of primary, local recurrent and metastatic tumors, and they are responsible for the resistance of tumors to conventional chemo- and radiotherapies.7, 20, 21 Therefore, development reagents aimed at CSCs in tumor imaging and targeted therapy holds promise to improve the survival and quality of life for cancer patients, especially for patients with metastatic ovarian cancer for which little progress has been made in recent years.22
In a previous study, we reported that a carbohydrate antigen recognized by Mab CC188 was expressed on the cell membranes of human colon CSCs and their differentiated progeny, but had limited expression in normal cells and tissues.23 In the current study, we examined the expression of Mab CC188 binding epitope in ovarian cancer stem (CD133+) cells and their differentiated progeny in vitro, and explored the feasibility of imaging ovarian xenograft tumors using Mab CC188 conjugated with near infrared (NIR) dye in a tumor bearing animal model.
Material and Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human ovarian cancer A2780 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS (Hyclone), 50 U ml−1 sodium penicillin, 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin sulfate (BioWhittaker) and 2 mM glutamine. SKOV-3 human ovarian cancer cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 U ml−1 sodium penicillin, 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin sulfate (BioWhittaker). Mab CC188 hybridoma cells were cultured in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 50 U ml−1 sodium penicillin, 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin sulfate, 4 mmol l−1 L-glutamine (BioWhittaker), 1 mmol l−1 sodium pyruvate (BioWhittaker) and 0.0001% h-mercaptoethanol (Sigma Chemical) for the antibody production. All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Monoclonal antibody production and purification
Monoclonal antibody (Mab) CC188 was produced by culturing the hybridoma cells in vitro and purified using protein G Sepharose according to the manufacturer's instruction (Amersham Biosciences). Briefly, the supernatant from the hybridoma culture was centrifuged at 14,000g for 20 min at 4°C, filtered through a 0.22-μm filter to remove fine particles, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 using equilibration buffer [1 mol l−1 Tris (pH 9.0)]. The supernatant was passed through a protein G Sepharose column (GE healthcare, Life Sciences) and the column was washed with binding buffer [50 mmol l−1 Na2PO4, 500 mmol l−1 NaCl (pH 6)] before eluting the antibody with glycine (0.1 mol l−1; pH 2.7). The antibody was collected and neutralized in a test tube containing 100 μl of equilibration buffer (1 mol l−1, pH 9.0). Antibody concentration was determined using a UV/vis spectrophotometer (Beckman DU 640).
Immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical staining
To examine the expression of Mab CC188 binding antigen on ovarian cancer cell membranes, we applied immunofluorescent staining assay in cultured cells without fixation and permeation. Under this staining condition, only cell surface molecules can be detected because whole IgG (150 KD) does not passively pass through intact cell membranes. Briefly, we seeded 20,000 cells per well in a Lab-Tek slide and allowed them to continuously culture in an incubator at 37°C for 48 hr. After decanting the culture medium, 50 μl Mab CC188 at a concentration of 5 μg ml−1 was added and incubated for 40 min at 37°C. The slide was washed 3× with PBS, and 50 μl of 1,000× diluted Alexa Flour 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probe) was added to each well of the Lab-Tek slide. The slide was incubated for another 40 min at room temperature. The slide was washed with PBS and observed under a confocal fluorescence microscope (Olympus FV1000).
To test the expression of the Mab CC188 binding epitope in human ovarian cancer tissues, we used ovarian tumor tissue arrays (Biomax). The tissue array slides were deparaffinized in xylene and gradient alcohol. After rehydration, the slides were immersed in antigen retrieval solution [10 mmol l−1 sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 6.0)] preheated to 100°C for 20 min. The buffer and the slides were cooled to room temperature and the slides were rinsed twice with PBS before incubation in blocking buffer containing 5% goat serum for 30 min. The slides were further incubated with a primary antibody at a concentration of 10 μg ml−1 for 1 hr at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After rinsing the slides and blocking with peroxidase blocking solution (3% H2O2 in PBS) for 10 min, the Avidin-Biotin Complex detection system (Vector Laboratory) was used following the manufacturer's instruction. The 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Vector laboratories) was used as chromogen. The stained slides were dehydrated with gradient alcohol and xylene. Finally, the slides were sealed with mounting medium, coversliped and scored independently by two researchers with pathology background using a conventional microscope. Based on the staining intensity, all cases were scored as Grade 0 (negative), Grade 1 (weak or faint), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (strong) and Grade 4 (very strong) staining. Based on the cell staining proportion, all cases were classified as no staining, <5%, 6–25%, 26–70% and >71%. A combination of both staining intensity and percentage resulted in the following classifications: (-) negative (Grade 0 or no staining); (±) weak positive (Grade 1 or <5%); and the rest of the cases with Grades 2–4 were classified according to the percentage of positively stained cells, (+) moderate positive (6–25%), (++) strong positive (26–70%) and (+++) very strong positive (>71%).
To explore the binding of Mab CC188 to ovarian CSCs, we isolated CD133 + cells using a magnetic cell sorting method as described in our previous publication.23 Briefly, after trypsinization, 1 × 107 ovarian cancer A2780 and SKOV-3 cells were resuspended in 100 μl of labeling (separation) buffer [PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 2 mmol l−1 EDTA (pH 7.2)]. Biotinylated antibody against CD133/1(10 μl) was added to the cell suspension for CD133 + cell magnetic isolation. Subsequently, we added 10 μl phycoerythrin conjugated antibody 293C3 against CD133/2 (Miltenyi Biotec) and 10 μl Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated Mab CC188 (5 μg ml−1) to the cell suspension for dual immunofluorescence staining. After refrigerating for 10 min and washing, the cell pellets were suspended in 80 μl of labeling buffer and 20 μl of anti-biotin MicroBeads, and incubated at 4°C for 15 min. The cells (1 × 107) were suspended in 500 μl separation buffer and loaded onto the column for magnetic separation. After washing the column with 500 μl separation buffer 3× and collecting magnetic bead unlabeled cells, the column was removed from separator (magnetic field) and magnetically labeled (CD133+) cells were collected by flushing the column with 1 ml buffer using the plunger supplied with the CD133 cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). The both magnetic bead labeled and unlabeled cells were spread on a histological slide and coversliped for fluorescence microscope observation. To labeled Mab CC188 with Alexa Fluor 488, we followed the manufacturer's instruction (Invitrogen). Briefly, bicarbonate (50 μl; pH 9.0; 1 mol l−1) was added to Mab CC188 (0.5 ml; 2 mg ml−1) to optimize the pH for efficient reaction of Alexa Fluor 488 dye and the protein. The antibody solution was transferred to a vial containing the reactive dye and the mixture was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature before passing it through a purification column from the labeling kit. The first fluorescence band was collected for immunofluorescence staining and the second band (free dye) was discarded. For confocal microscopy, cells cultured on Lab-Tek slides were visualized with an Olympus FV1000 microscope after the immunostaining. Dual color, Alexa Flour 488-conjugated Mab CC188 and phycoerythrin-conjugated Mab 294C3 (Miltenyi), stained slides were analyzed using a sequential program from Olympus FV1000 microscope software.
Labeling of Mab CC188 (IgG) with NIR fluorescent dye for imaging in vivo
For tumor optical imaging in a tumor bearing mouse, we labeled Mab CC188 with NIR dye using an IRDye 800CW Protein Labeling Kit (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska) following manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, IRDye dye in a tube was dissolved in 25μl of ultra pure water provided in the kit and mixed thoroughly by vortexing. Dye solution (7.2 μl) from the tube reacted with 1 ml Mab CC188 solution (1 mg ml−1, free of ammonium ions, primary amines and preservatives such as sodium azide by dialysis and gel filtration). The mixture was incubated for 2 hr at 20°C with protection from light. The dye-antibody conjugate was isolated from free dye using the Pierce Zeba Desalting Spin Column that came with the labeling kit. To verify the labeling quality, we measured the absorbance of the solution containing conjugates at 280 and 780 nm (A280 and A780) and calculated the moles of dye per mole of protein according to the formula provided by LI-COR Biosciences. The labeling ratio of dye/protein is 1-2/1.
Optical imaging of tumor in vivo
BALB/c background nude mice were used in this study (n = 2). About 1 × 107 A2780 human ovarian cancer cells were injected subcutaneously at left lower abdomen for comparing fluorescence intensity of liver and tumor using optical imaging probe. We purposely allowed the tumor to grow larger (2 cm × 2.3 cm × 1.5 cm) to develop ischemic necrosis in the center area of the tumor for measuring the tumor tissue penetration ability of the IgG-based imaging probes in vivo. For noninvasive optical imaging, 100 μg of dye-labeled Mab CC188 in 100 μl of PBS solution was administered per tumor-bearing animal by tail vein injection. The ventral side of the animal was scanned with the Pearl NIR imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) at indicated time points. At the end of experiment (120-hr post probe injection), ex vivo biodistribution of the imaging reagents was assessed to confirm the noninvasive in vivo observation. Briefly, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation under isoflurane anesthesia at 120-hr post injection of the imaging reagent. Aliquots of blood and portions of major organs (heart, kidney, lung, spleen, brain, etc.) were harvested, washed with PBS and dabbed dry. The Pearl Imager was used to uniformly excite the tissues and organs at the appropriate wavelengths.
Reactivity of Mab CC188 to human ovarian cancer SKOV-3 and A2780 cells
In a previous study, we demonstrated that Mab CC188 binds to colon cancer cells.23 To test Mab CC188 binding antigen expression in ovarian cancer cells, we stained Mab CC188 in two human ovarian cancer cell lines, SKOV-3 and A2780. As shown in Figure 1, Mab CC188 stains all the ovarian cancer cells and internalized into the cytoplasm through the cell membrane of cultured (living) cells after incubation with Mab CC188 for 40 min at 37°C. As mentioned above, IgG (150 KD) cannot passively pass through intact cell membrane. The internalization requires that Mab CC188 first binds to cell surface receptors or antigens followed by a receptor-mediated endocytosis. The internalization implies that Mab CC188 binding antigen is expressed on the ovarian cancer cell surface. In fixed and permeabilized cells with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 0.2% triton X-100, Mab CC188 binding antigen can be detected in both cell membranes and cytoplasm.
Human ovarian cancer tissue array analysis
To evaluate the antibody for ovarian tumor imaging and targeted therapy, we examined the sensitivity and homogeneity of the antibody to human ovarian cancer using tissue arrays (OVC1501, Biomax, US). The results indicate that 75% (92/123 cases) of ovarian cancer are positively stained with Mab CC188. Weak positive, moderate positive, strong positive and very strong positive are 14.8, 3.7, 11 and 24.4%, respectively. About 35% of ovarian cancers examined show intense and homogenous staining in all histological types of ovarian cancer (Fig. 2).
Expression of the epitope recognized by Mab CC188 on the surface of human ovarian cancer (CD133+) stem cells
Mab CC188 stained all the tumor cells examined (Fig. 1). It also reacted with a small fraction of CD133-positive (CSCs) cells. These cells exist as a small fraction of tumor mass and they have been hypothesized to be cancer initiating cells and responsible for cancer recurrence, metastasis and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapies. Based on the hypothesis of CSCs, imaging and therapeutic reagents that target CSCs hold great promise for discovering early stage tumors, potentially localizing subclinical (clinically invisible and palpable) malignant lesions and completely eradicating the disease. As Figure 3 shows, Mab CC188 binds to CD133 + cells from both ovarian cancer cell lines, SKOV-3 and A2780. Notably, all cells stained with Mab 293C3 against CD133 antigen were costained with Mab CC188. In contrast, Mab CC188 does not react to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, panel B) and CD34 positive normal hematopoietic cells sorted by flow cytometry (panel C).
Biodistribution and kinetic changes of Mab CC188 labeled with NIR dye imaging probes in vivo
A major motivation for identifying tumor specific binding ligands including antibodies is for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Evaluation of imaging and therapeutic reagents in the experimental animal is a critical stage for developing biological reagents for future clinical use. Therefore, we labeled Mab CC188 with a NIR dye IRDye 800CW and monitored the biodistribution and kinetic changes of the antibody-NIR dye conjugates in ovarian tumor-bearing mice. As demonstrated in Figure 4, majority of the imaging probes is eliminated from circulation 24-hr postinjection and completely removed from blood pool 48 hr after injection. In addition, the ratios of tumor/gut fluorescence continuously increase postinjection. The rapid clearance and tumor-specific accumulation of this imaging probe ensures high quality tumor images. Significant amounts of the conjugates accumulate in excretion organs (liver) at 5 min, 15 min and 1-hr postinjection. At 24 hr, the imaging conjugates predominantly accumulated in the tumor, but the intensity of the imaging probes was decreased in the liver (Fig. 5a). A significant amount of the imaging probe was still retained in the tumor at 120-hr post-injection (Fig. 5b). Quantitative analysis clearly shows that the amount of imaging probe gradually increased in the tumor tissue and mirrored by a decrease in the liver after the injection (Fig. 5e). The ratio of tumor to normal tissue is more than 3 after 24 hr and lasted at least 120 hr after probe injection (Fig. 5, panel d). Most interestingly, once the probe penetrated into the center (necrotic) areas of the tumor, it was retained there for as long as 120 hr (Fig. 5b). The center area of the tumor was confirmed by histology as necrotic tumor tissue (arrow head in Fig. 5c). Cell debris was also seen in the boundary between tumor and necrotic tissue (open arrow in panel C). Living tumor cells were also observed around blood vessels (solid arrow in panel C).
Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death from a cancer of gynecologic origin and the fourth most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide.24 The primary reason for this high mortality is that most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at a late stage.3 Most patients with advanced disease will relapse within 5 years after initial treatment. Early detection and localization of small or subclinical (occult) tumors,25 specifically identifying subcentimeter peritoneal implants, is a significant adverse factor in the treatment of this disease.26 Computerized tomography (CT) is a commonly used imaging technique in the clinic, but it frequently fails to identify tumors less than 1 cm in diameter owing to the low contrast of metastatic deposits relative to the normal peritoneal and serosal surface.27–29 Furthermore, CT images cannot reflect alterations in tumor functional status that occur after cytotoxic therapy. In contrast, functional imaging techniques, such as radioimmunoscintigraphy and PET/CT, can accurately localize the tumor and provide additional biological information about this cancer. The functional imaging techniques require tumor specific binding ligands such as peptides and antibodies.
Antigens on the cell surface are easily accessible for binding ligands including antibodies for tumor targeted imaging and therapy. The binding of Mab CC188 to living (cultured) cells indicates that the epitope recognized by the antibody is localized on the cell membranes because living cells only allow surface molecules to be detected in the immunofluorescent staining. The intact cell membranes in living cells prevent IgG (150 KD) from entering the cells passively. The internalization of Mab CC188 is also a remarkable feature which favors intracellular delivery of anticancer drugs. Most interestingly, Mab CC188 binds to ovarian CD133 + (cancer stem) cells which are believed to be initiating cells of primary, local recurrent and metastatic tumors, and responsible for resistance to conventional chemo- and radiotherapies.7, 20 Thereby, developing imaging reagents aimed at CSCs could facilitate small tumor detection and improve the survival of cancer patients.30 CD133 is relatively well documented as a biomarker for ovarian CSCs.31–36 Significant numbers of CD133+ cells coexpress CD44/CD117 molecules which are suggested to be CSC biomarkers.33 Studies have shown that a single CD133 positive cell can develop two population of cells, CD133+ and CD133- cell population. In contrast, a single CD133- cell can only develop CD133- cell population.32 For these reasons, ovarian cancer CD133+ cells should be targeted by imaging reagents for early tumor detection. Despite the key roles played by CSCs in tumor initiation, development and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapies, antibody based tumor targeting therapeutic reagents that are presently used either do not directly target tumor cells or inefficiently target CSCs.37 For example, Bevacizumab, an antibody approved by the FDA, targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibits tumor growth mainly through the mechanism of antiangiogenesis.37 Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted by Trastuzumab and Cetuximab approved by FDA is not strongly expressed in CSCs.38
Tumor and normal tissue array analysis demonstrate that about 75% of human ovarian cancer tissue samples are stained with Mab CC188, while peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), hematopoietic stem (CD34+) cells and most normal tissues are negative with Mab CC188 staining.23 These results imply that the Mab CC188 is an ideal candidate for developing biological imaging and therapeutic reagents for ovarian cancer early discovery and treatment.
Diffusion, clearance and cellular internalization of imaging probes determine their biodistribution and kinetic changes in vivo. In this study, we have observed that the probes penetrate throughout the tumor within 24-hr postinjection, particularly diffusing into the tumor core and/or necrotic areas. Moreover, the probe is retained in the tumor tissue for at least 120 hr. We found that once the imaging probes reach the core and/or tissue necrotic areas, they accumulate and are retained there for a longer period of time than when they are bound to peripheral tumor tissues and excretory organs such as the liver and kidney. Mab CC188-based imaging and therapeutic reagents may be capable of detecting subclinical tumors in vivo and efficiently delivering anticancer drugs to the tumor cells localized in the boundary regions of necrotic tissue and tumor tissue. These regions supposedly contain abundant quiescent/CSC cells.18, 39, 40 Antibody-based imaging and therapeutic reagents have advantages and disadvantages in tumor targeted imaging and therapy. The conjugates of antibody with imaging agents and anticancer drugs generally have higher binding affinity and specificity. They are also retained in the tumor for a much longer time compared to small peptide-based imaging and therapeutic reagents. The disadvantage is that longer time is required for clearance from normal cells and tissues including blood and excretory organs. There are also some concerns about diffusion of antibody-based imaging and therapeutic reagents into deep tumor tissues where there is a higher interstitial fluid pressure and heterogeneous blood supply.41, 42 However, our results demonstrate that Mab CC188-NIR conjugates penetrated into the necrotic tumor tissues within 24 hr. Furthermore, to shorten the clearance time and reduce the binding of antibody-based imaging and therapeutic reagents to normal tissue, other investigators have developed several tumor pretargeting systems and IgG fragments-based imaging and therapeutic reagents such as Fab, F(ab')2, scFv, diabodies and minibodies.43, 44 In a future study, it would be interesting to inoculate ovarian CSCs into nude mice to develop a xenograft which will contain more CSCs32 for the feasibility study of the imaging and therapeutic reagents in vivo. Furthermore, antibody conjugated with NIR imaging probes may be useful for identifying subclinical implants on peritoneal regions before and during surgery. In addition, the antibody could be labeled with radionuclide to detect small tumors using nuclear imaging. Many ovarian cancer patients including Stage I patients have subclinical (unsuspected) metastasis.45, 46 Identifying subclinical tumors will help the physician to properly manage the disease because the subclinical tumor influences patient survival.47–49
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- 1Available at: http://www.atihealthnet.com/pages/ovariancancer.html.
- 22Available at: http://www.atihealthnet.com/pages/ovariancancer.html.: