Utility of subtyping intestinal metaplasia as marker of gastric cancer risk. A review of the evidence

Authors

  • Carlos A. González,

    Corresponding author
    • Unit of Nutrition, Environment and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology (IDIBELL-ICO), Barcelona, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • José M. Sanz-Anquela,

    1. Department of Pathology. Hospital “Principe de Asturias”, University of Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Javier P. Gisbert,

    1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Pelayo Correa

    Corresponding author
    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence to: Carlos A. González, Unit of Nutrition, Environment and Cancer, Department of Epidemiology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain, E-mail: cagonzalez@iconcologia.net and Pelayo Correa, Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2215 Garland Avenue 1030 MRB IV, Nashville, TN 37232, USA, E-mail: pelayo.correa@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

The identification and surveillance of patients with preneoplastic lesions at high risk of progressing to gastric cancer (GC) represents the most effective way of reducing the burden of GC. The incomplete type of intestinal metaplasia (IM) could be considered as the best candidate for surveillance. However, the usefulness of subtyping of IM has been considered by some authors as limited and inconsistent. A search was carried out to identify all cross-sectional (n=14) and follow-up (n=10) studies that assessed the risk of GC among subjects with different types of IM. Out of the 14 cross-sectional studies, 13 reported that the prevalence of incomplete IM was statistically significantly higher in GC than in other gastric lesions. Out of the ten follow-up studies, six found a statistically significant association between incomplete IM and subsequent GC risk. The relative risks of GC were from 4- to 11-fold higher for the presence of incomplete type in comparison to complete type or in comparison to the absence of incomplete type, among the studies that reported the magnitude of the risk. According to this comprehensive review, most of the scientific evidence supports the utility of subtyping IM as a predictor of GC risk. Recognizing its usefulness by gastroenterologists should encourage pathologists to subtype IM.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major health burden. It is the second most frequent cause of cancer deaths worldwide.[1] Most cases are diagnosed when the tumor cells have invaded the muscularis propria and have a dismal prognosis.[2] The most promising hope to control the disease is through early diagnosis and prevention. GC is the result of a decades-long multistep and multifactorial process, presenting an opportunity for intervention to prevent the disease.[3] The process starts as an inflammatory process in the antrum, usually associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, which may progress toward a multifocal chronic atrophic gastritis, followed by intestinal metaplasia (IM), dysplasia and finally invasive carcinoma.[4]

In countries with a relatively low risk of GC, the surveillance of all these GC precursor lesions is not cost-effective. On the other hand, in high or moderate risk populations the identification of patients with preneoplastic lesions at high risk of progressing to GC, and their periodic surveillance, represents the most effective way for reducing the burden of GC.[5]

It has long been recognized that IM is a heterogeneous lesion. Teglbjaer and Nielsen in 1978[6] reported that in gastrectomy specimens with gastric carcinoma, the nontumor mucosa harbored abundant foci of IM of the “small intestinal type” but that foci of IM of “colonic type” were most frequently associated with carcinoma of the intestinal types. Japanese investigators[7] reported that some IM specimens expressed the full (complete) set of digestive enzymes, whereas in others such enzymes were either absent or incompletely expressed. Jass and Filipe[8] described several variants of IM, according to the histology and types of mucin secreted. Although there are several classifications of IM types, currently they are generally subclassified as “complete” (small intestinal type) or “incomplete” (colonic type, which is thought to be the most advanced stage of IM[9] and with the highest risk to progress to GC). Therefore, incomplete type of IM could be considered as the best candidate for surveillance.

However, the need to re-evaluate premalignant gastric lesions is controversial.[10-12] Even so, an algorithm was recently proposed for management of these lesions[5] taking into account the status of H. pylori infection and the type and extension of IM. Nevertheless, a very recently published Guideline[13] recommended endoscopic surveillance every 3 years for patients with extensive atrophy and/or IM, but concluded that subtyping of IM was not advised for clinical practice, because evidence on its usefulness was thought to be “limited and inconsistent,” and “its evaluation requires the use of immunohistochemistry techniques that are not widespread in routine diagnostics.”

The aim of this systematic review is to describe all the published scientific studies that evaluated the usefulness of subtyping IM as marker of GC risk and to present the histological stains needed for diagnosis and classification of types of IM in clinical practice.

Methods

A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE and ScienceDirect was carried out up to January 2012 to identify studies on subtyping IM and GC using the terms “types of IM” AND “gastric cancer” (944, 76, 21 and 68 publications found respectively) as key words. The search was narrowed to include only articles examining the prevalence or effect of type of IM, through morphology and or histochemical staining, in relation with GC risk. Studies were included if the authors described the type of IM in relation with GC and at least one comparison group (other preneoplastic lesion, gastric ulcer or other gastric non-neoplastic lesions). Titles and abstracts of the articles selected in each of these multiple searches were reviewed, and those meeting our inclusion criteria were selected for the evaluation of the original article. The studies were classified according to the study type: (i) cross-sectional studies, as those that assessed the prevalence of different types of IM in the surrounding mucosa of the gastric tumor from surgical specimens and comparing it with the prevalence in biopsy specimens from patients with other gastric pathology and (ii) follow-up studies of prospective, retrospective or prospective-retrospective design that assessed the risk of GC (GC occurrence during a specific time) among different types of IM, comparing with other GC precursor lesion or other benign gastric lesion.

The variables extracted for cross-sectional studies were as follows: Author/Journal/Year, Country, Number of patients with GC, Type of controls and Matching, Method of IM typing, Number and site of biopsies and Main results. For follow-up studies, in addition were extracted: Years of follow-up, Setting (population or hospital based), Level of GC in the population, Design, Validation of diagnosis and Adjustment in the analysis. Type of lesions, was included as a variable, in replacement of Number of patients with GC and other pathology, Number and site of biopsies at baseline and at the end of follow-up, were also extracted. The outcome of interest for cross-sectional studies was the prevalence of subtypes of IM in GC cases and in the control group. For follow-up studies, the outcome of interest was the incidence of GC according to different IM types at the end of the follow-up.

Results

Characteristics of studies

A total of 14 cross-sectional[14-27] and ten follow-up studies[28-37] met all the search criteria. Three cross-sectional studies were excluded because of the lack of a comparison group.[38-40] The cross-sectional studies, summarized in Table 1, were published between 1980 and 2008 (mostly before 1991) and were carried out in countries from Asia, Europe and Latin America. There was considerable variation in the sample size: GC cases range from 16 to 360 patients, whereas controls from 67 to 1326. Several types of controls were used, with the most common being: normal mucosa, chronic gastritis, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer.

Table 1. Cross-sectional studies subtyping intestinal metaplasia
Study/Author/CountryNumber of patientsN and site of biopsiesResults
Year (Reference)Gastric cancerOther pathology
Kang et al. J Gast Hepatol 2009 ([14])Korea360247 Control 156 Gastric Ulcer 98 Dysplasia2 Antrum 2 BodyPrevalence of IM type II significantly higher in Disp+GC than in controls, in samples from the body and Hp+ but not in samples from antrum.
Vukobrat-Bijedic Bosnian J of Basic Medic Sciences 2006 ([15])Bosnia-Herzegovina5050 Chronic atrophic Gastritis Hp+1.2 cm from tumor and Corpus Antrum PyloriIM was found in 41 (82%) out of 50 patients with GC 17 (34%) had complete IM 24 (48%) had incomplete IM No IM type III was found in the control group. Type I in 13 (26%) and type II in 7 (14%)
Cassaro et al Am J Gast 2000 ([16])Colombia6867 Nonulcer Dyspepsia5 Antrum 6 Corpus 1 CardiaIncomplete IM was found in 40 (59%) out of 68 with GC Incomplete IM was found in 4 (6%) out of 67 controls Complete IM was found in 22 (33%) out of 67 controls Incomplete IM was more extensive and multifocal in GC Incomplete IM significantly associated, with the presence of GC.
Wu Br J Cancer 1998 ([17])Taiwan135 (57 diffuse 78 intestinal)135 Matched controls Receiving Endoscopy Without ulcer or GC2 Antrum 2 Corpus 1 IncisuraPrevalence type I : GC 6 (4 %); controls 17 (13 %) Type II: GC 22 (16.%) ; controls 25 (18 %) Type III: GC 62 (46%) ; controls 7 (5 %) OR Type III=39.8 (14–110) OR Type I=0.82 (0.3–2.4) regarding those GC without IM
Craanen et al. Dig Dis Sci 1991 ([18])The Netherlands16 GC (8 diffuse 8 intestinal)126 Normal 298 Gastritis 67 Gastric ulcer 26 ErosionAdjacent mucosa plus about 3 from antrumNo significant differences of type I or II among diseases Type III was strongly associated with intestinal-type GC as compared either benign lesions (p<0.01) or diffuse Type
Matsukuma et al. Cancer 1990 ([19])Japan42 (21 intestinal 21 diffuse)13 Gastric ulcer 7 Duodenal ulcer 1 Erosive gastritisSwiss-roll slices Gastrectomy SpecimensNo significant differences in frequency of type IIB IM between intestinal type GC and non-neoplastic lesions.
Kini et al. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1990 ([20])India? GCNormal Chronic gastritisNSType III found only in gastric carcinoma, non in benign lesions Prevalence of sulfomucins producing IM higher in GC
Sirigu et al. Riv Eur Sci Med Farmacol 1991 ([21])Italy28 GC64 Chronic atrophic gast 42 Gastric ulcerMucosa bordering carcinoma and at least three sitesComplete IM most common in benign condition Incomplete IM associated, with the presence of GC
Silva and Filipe Human Pathol 1986 ([22])Portugalfrom biopsy: 110 GC from resected material: 99 (60 intest)478 Chronic gastritis 170 Gastric ulcer 283 Normal plus 19 Peptic ulcer from gastrectomytumour and gastrectomy plus antrum Body IncisuraType III IM in 36% of GC, but only in 2% of benign lesions (p=<0.0001) Type III was significantly associated with intestinal but not diffuse GC.
Huang Cancer 1986 ([23])China5461 Atrophic gastritis And Superficial4 quadrant for tumor and 6 sites (antrum, corpus, fundus, cardia)24 (73%) of 99 GC were sulfomucin+(colonic type) 11 (33%) of gastritis were sulfomucin+(colonic type) prevalence significantly higher in GC (p<0.01)
Rothery J Clin Pathol 1985 ([24])UK135182 Normal 618 Chronic gastritis 441 Gastric ulcer 30 DysplasiaAntrum Transition bodyCardia (x=3.5 per case)Type I was most common in all kind of patients Type III only in GC and dysplasia (67%) . Prevalence significantly higher (p=< 0.001) in GC than benign lesions
Filipe et al. Gut 1985 ([25])London Paris Reims24480 normal 642 gastritis 204 gastric ulcerSeveral from GC lesions antrum and Fundus (x=3.7 per case)Prevalence: Type III in 7% of benign lesions Type III in of 35% carcinoma. Significantly higher (p<0.0001) in GC than in benign lesions
Sipponem Pathol Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1980 ([26])Finland12562 pernicious anemia 301 first degree relatives of GC 183 first degree relatives of anemia 406 out patients 358 population controls2–4 from antrum 6–10 from bodyPrevalence of colonic type (sulfomucins +), significantly higher in GC patients than in the other series
Matsukura et al. JNCI 1980 ([27])Japan8427 gastric ulcer 16 duodenal ulcerSurrounding lesions from gastrectomyIM was found in 95% of minute GC of the intestinal thype 80% of them surrounding by incomplete IM

The follow-up studies, summarized in Table 2, were published between 1986 and 2010 (mostly after 1991) and were carried out in countries from Asia, Europe and USA with diverse risk of GC. The number of participant patients range from 69 to 1,525, and some studies followed-up only patients with different types of IM, while others also included other gastric lesions. The length of follow-up ranged from 10 months to 19 years, and in only three studies[28, 33, 36] the length of follow-up was more than 10 years. Two of the studies[28, 33] were population-based, whereas the others were hospital-based. Three studies were prospective,[28, 29, 32] five studies were retrospective[30, 31, 33-35] and two studies were retrospective and prospective.[35] In three of the retrospective studies,[33, 36, 37] the outcome was identified through record-linkage with cancer registries. There was considerable variation in the site and number of biopsies taken at baseline, while in several studies this information was missing[30, 32, 34, 36, 37]. In only three studies,[28-30] the intra and or interobserver agreement in the pathological diagnoses was assessed. Prospective studies assessed the end-point, through new endoscopies and biopsies, whereas in retrospective studies it was defined by record linkage with Cancer Registries or review of clinical, pathological records and pathological material.

Table 2. Follow-up studios subtyping intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer risk
Study Author Year (Ref)PlaceLevel of GC riskNo PatientsDesignAdjusted byFollow up (Years)SettingsType of lesionsNo Biopsia and site baselineNo Biopsia and site EndMain results
  1. Abbreviations: NAG, non atrophic gastritis; MAG, multifocal atrophic gastritis; CIM, complete intestinal metaplasia; IIM, incomplete intestinal metaplasia; LGD, low grade dysplasia; HGD, high grade dysplasia; CAG, chronic atrophic gastritis; GU, gastric ulcer; IMSM−,intestinal metaplasia sulfomucins negative; IMSM+, intestinal metaplasia sulfomucins positive; NS, not specified.

Gonzalez et al. Int J Cancer 2010 ([28])SpainModerate/ High478ProspectiveSex, age, family history of GC, NSAID use12.8Province- basednormal: 8 (2%) NAG: 55(12%) MAG: 223 (47%) CIM: 104(21%) IIM : 88(18%)3 to 4 Minimal 2 antral 1 corpus5 (Sidney)Incidence rate of GC: 16.5 (10.1–26.9)/1000 person year for IIM 1.73 (0.7– 4.2)/1000 person year for MAG HR 11.3 (95 %CI 3.8–33.9) IIM present vs. absent
Tava et al. . Human Pathol. 2006 ([29])ItalyModerate471ProspectiveSex, age, immuturity atypia, H. pylori status4.3Hospital (patients Dyspeptic symptoms)100% IM covering at least 10% of mucosal area3 antral 2 angulus 2 corpus3 antral 2 angulus 2 corpusComparing IIM≥10% vs.<10% extension HR=3.1 (1.3–7.3) in univariate analysis but in multivariate, type or extension were not a prognostic factor (yes age, Hp, atipia) results comparing IIM vs. CIM not shown
Ribeiro et al. J Clin Pathol 2004 ([30])PortugalHigh144 (239 pairs of biopsies)RetrospectiveSex, age, H.pylori prevalenceup to 17 monthsHospital

CAG: 58 (24%)

NSNS4 GC+ 7 HGD=all preceded by IIM or LGD IIM vs. CIM or CAG: HR 4.64 (95% CI 1.8–11.8)
Type I : 62 (26%)
Type II/III:57 (24%)
LGD: 62 (26%)
El Zimaity et al. J Clinic Pathol 2001 ([31])USALow79RetrospectiveRisk was not estimated74: 1 yHospital 3 to 12 minimal 2 antral 1 corpus3 to 12 minimal 2 antral 1 corpusDuring follow up no patient developed GC or dysplasia
IM 100%
28: 2 ysType II: 33 (42%)
36: 9 ysType III: 34(43%)
 
Lin et al. Chin Med Journal 2001 ([32])TaiwanModerate/ High69ProspectiveNonemean: 10 months range: 1–23 endoscopy every 3 MHospitalMild Dysp.:25;Several No: NSsite: NSNS10 GC out of 15 type III and 11 severe dysplasia 36 IM type I and 2 severe dysplasia and 15 moderate dysplasia none with malignant changes
Moderat Dys:24;
Severe Dysp.: 20
Type I:36; Type II:18
Type III:15
Filipe et al. Int J Cancer 1994 ([33])SloveniaModerate/ High1525 900 had confirmed IMRetrospectiveSex, age19Country- basedIM 100%3 (2 antrum 1 corpus)GC DiagnosisHR 2.14 (95 % CI 0.7-7.0) Type II vs. Tipe I HR 4.58 (1.8-11.9)Type III vs. Type I
Type I=518(34%)
Type II =197(13%)
Type III= 275(18%)
Not confirmed=291(19%)
Rokkas et al. Gut 1991 ([34])UKLow412 (cross sectional) (282 follow- up) 26 with IMRetrospective and ProspectiveRisk was not estimated6Hospital26 with IMNSNSType III was present in 16 of 18 GC diagnosed during period. 11 out of 16 GC cases detected by regular endoscopic surveillance during follow-up, most as early GC.
Silva et al. Gut 1990 ([35])PortugalHigh58 CAG with IM, 66 GU (peptic)Retrospective and ProspectiveRisk was not estimatedup to 6 58=2ys 41=3ysHospitalType I=47(81%)Antrum and Body No: 4.1NS8 Type III IM → 4 developed Dysplasia → 1 developed GC 47 Type I IM → 45% reverted →55% remained unchanged
Type II=3 (5%)
Type III=8 (14%)
Ramesar et al. J Clin Pathol 1987 ([36])ScotlandLow174RetrospectiveRisk was not estimatedup to 11Hospitalno IM=130(75%)Na: NS Site: NSGC Diagnosis130 no IM → GC=0
Type I=16 (9%)16 type I IM → GC=0
Type II =14 (8%)14 type II IM→ GC=1 (7.1%)
Type III=14 (8%)14 type III IM→ GC=1 (7.1%)
Ectors and Dixon Histophatol 1986 ([37])UKLow230 with CAGRetrospectiveRisk was not estimatedup to 9Hospitalno IM=59 (26%)NSGC DiagnosisSulfomucins+(all type III and part of type I and type II) vs. sulfomucins -
IMSM-=79 (34%)59 IM absent → 1 GC
IMSM+ =92 (40%)79 SM−→ 1 GC
92 SM+→ 1 GC

Subtyping IM: Diagnosis and classification

There was considerable variation in the criteria used for diagnosis and classification of the type of IM in the reviewed studies. Subtyping of IM was done by a combination of morphology and mucins staining. Most of the studies used specimens stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), alcian blue (AB)/periodic acid-Shiff (PAS) at pH 2.5, and high iron diamine (HID)/AB.[14, 17, 26, 27, 31] One study[27] used also marker enzymes as aminopeptidase and phosphatase. Most of the studies classified IM as type I, II or III, or as complete (type I) or incomplete (type II and III), whereas others[15, 19, 21, 24] classified the IM as type I, type IIa (sialomucin) and type IIb (sulfomucin positive). Sulfomucins may be found in type IIb and type III IM columnar cells. Types I and IIa display sialomucins and/or neutral mucins, but no sulfomucins, at least in the columnar cells.[25]

Association between type of IM and GC in cross-sectional studies

Of the 14 cross-sectional studies, 13 reported that the prevalence of type III IM or incomplete IM was statistically significantly higher in GC than in other gastric lesions.[14-18, 20-27] In most of the studies, type III IM was more frequently associated with intestinal-type GC than with diffuse type. One study,[19] with only 21 GCs of intestinal type, was the only one without significant differences in the prevalence of incomplete IM between GC cases and controls.

Association between type of IM and GC in follow-up studies

Of the 10 follow-up studies,[28-37] six found a statistically significant association between type III IM or incomplete IM and subsequent GC risk.[28, 30, 32-35] The risk and cumulative incidence of GC for type III IM was higher than for type II and type I, and higher than for other gastric lesions. The relative risks of GC were from 4- to 11-fold higher for type III in comparison to type I or in comparison to the absence of type III IM, among the studies that reported the magnitude of the risk. One of these studies[34] showed that surveillance of patients with type III IM increased the probability of diagnosing dysplasia and early GC. In a second phase of this study, 26 patients identified as having type III IM were followed with endoscopy and biopsy at 6 to 12 month intervals. Out of these 26 patients, 11 (42%) were diagnosed with early GC during the follow-up, indicating a high positive predictive value.

Other two follow-up studies[29, 36] also found an association between the type of IM and GC risk. One of these studies[29] found a significant association with type III IM in the univariate analysis, but not when age, H. pylori infection status and level of atypia were included in the multivariate model. The other study[36] that followed-up a small number (n=44) of patients with IM, observed two GCs, one diagnosed at baseline as type III and the other diagnosed as type II, while no GC was observed among type I IM or in patients without IM. On the contrary, another study,[31] that followed-up only 79 patients with diverse types of IM for 1 to 9 years, found that no patient developed GC or dysplasia. Most of patients were, however, lost to follow-up. Out of the 34 patients with type III IM at baseline, it was possible to obtain a new biopsy at the second year of follow-up in only 13 patients, and at the 9th year in only nine patients. Finally there is one more study,[37] in which only three GC were identified after 8 years of follow-up, out of 171 patients with IM at baseline (92 classified as sulfomucin positive). Only one of these three GC cases was classified as sulfomucin positive IM at baseline.

Discussion

In the present comprehensive review of studies, utilizing IM subtyping, we have observed that out of the 14 cross-sectional studies, 13 reported that the prevalence of incomplete IM was statistically significantly associated with a higher GC risk than in other gastric lesions. Several of these studies, including one with negative result,[19] used patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer or normal mucosa as control, that may not be appropriated to be compared with GC cases. However, there are at least four studies[15-17, 23] with more appropriate controls such as chronic atrophic gastritis or non ulcer dyspepsia, for which incomplete IM was significantly associated with GC. Only one study[17] described that the controls were matched to the cases by sex, age, ethnic and residence; this means they were controlled for confounding factors. On the other hand, even though cross-sectional studies are not suitable to identify prognosis factors, they provide evidence that when GC is diagnosed, incomplete type IM is the most frequent lesion found in the gastric mucosa, suggesting that it is the most procarcinogenic phenotype and one of the last steps in the cascade of GC precursor lesions, that could fulfill the histological criteria for being classified as low-grade dysplasia.[41]

Follow-up studies with a relative large sample size and long follow-up are the best design to assess the usefulness of subtyping of IM as a marker of GC risk. Out of the ten follow-up studies, we found six with a statistically significant association between incomplete IM and subsequent GC risk[28, 30, 32-35] and two[29, 36] with a nonsignificant positive association. These results have been observed in populations with relative high GC risk such as Portugal, China and Slovenia as well as in populations with moderate GC risk as Italy and Spain. This indicates that subtyping IM plays a major role in predicting GC risk. Three of the studies that found a significant association with incomplete IM[28, 33, 34] were the largest studies and with the longest follow-up. Two of them[28, 33] were the only population-based studies, which tend to be less affected by selection bias. One of these studies[34] also showed that surveillance of patients with type III IM increase the probability of diagnosing dysplasia and early GC.

Two very important potential limitations of follow-up studies are sample size and length of follow-up. The likelihood of observing a statistical significant association between type of IM and GC risk in studies with small sample size and/or short follow-up is very low. This could be the explanation of studies[31, 36, 37] without significant association in which no GC or few cases of GC were identified at the end of follow-up. The limited statistical power of these studies could be also affected by the low level of GC risk of the population in which they were carried-out (USA, UK and Scotland). Among follow-up studies that have evaluated the incidence rate of GC, one study found an incidence rate of 16.5 per 1,000 patients with incomplete IM per year of follow-up in a population with a relative high risk of GC.[28] In a nationwide study in The Netherlands,[42] a country with a low risk of GC, the annual incidence of GC, within 5 years after diagnosis of IM, was 2.5 cases for every 1,000 patients with IM. This means that, depending of the level or risk, it is necessary to follow-up between 61 cases (with incomplete IM) to 400 cases (with IM) to report the occurrence of one case of GC in 1 year.

Another potential limitation of follow-up studies is sampling error associated with multifocal lesions. In half of the follow-up studies that found a significant association between IM and GC risk[30, 32, 34] and in half of the studies that did not find such association,[36, 37] the information about the number and site of biopsies at baseline was missing. It is well known that the opportunity to identify lesions depends on the number and site of biopsy specimens taken, the Sydney system being the ideal design. With few samples, true lesions may be missed, resulting in false negative diagnoses, and this could lead to an underestimation of the true association between type of IM and GC risk, affecting mainly those studies with negative results and with a retrospective design.

The recent published Guideline for endoscopic management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach[13] concluded that subtyping of IM is not recommended for clinical practice “because the evidence about their usefulness is limited and inconsistent.” The same recommendation —for the same reason—has been given by the Royal College of Pathologists[12]; however, these guidelines were based only on the studies with negative results. If all studies are taken into account, as may be appreciated in the present review, there is so far overwhelming evidence about their utility, although more large and well designed follow-up studies are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.

The other apparent limitation encountered by some authors is that “subtyping of IM requires the use of immunohistochemistry techniques that are not widespread in routine diagnostic,”[13] which may limit its clinical application. Comparison studies about the sensibility and specificity of different methods and techniques for the diagnosis of the type of IM are lacking. However, according to our experience, subtyping of IM does not require the use of immunohistochemistry techniques; in fact, the classification of IM (complete or incomplete) was documented before the development of immunohistochemistry. Subtypes of IM can be easily recognized with H&E, which is the main routine histological stain widely used in clinical practice. Based on morphology (Fig. 1) in sections stained with H&E,[5, 41] “complete IM” (small intestinal type or type I) is characterized by an epithelium that resembles the small intestinal phenotype, with well-defined brush border cells (representing absorptive microvilli) and well-formed goblet cells. “Incomplete IM” (colonic type or type II/IIa and III/IIb) resembles a colonic epithelium phenotype, with columnar cells without brush border cells, showing multiple intracytoplasmic mucin droplets of different size and shape.

Figure 1.

Intestinal metaplastic glands with H&E. Complete IM with brush border and globet cells (left). Incomplete IM with slight architectural glandular distortion and presence of globet cells and multivacuolated hybrid columnar intermediate cells, without brush border cells (right). (Courtesy of Dr. Blanca Piazuelo, Vanderbilt University).

Distinguishing complete from incomplete IM is useful in clinical practice. The use of staining to assess the types of mucins expressed by each subtype should be restricted to research. In clinical practice, in cases of doubt because of insufficient or inadequate tissue, the pathologist could use the PAS-AB staining at pH 2.5, which is an easy, cheap and standardized mucin stain. The only reagent of concern is AB/HID because iron diamine is toxic. It could be argued that without the HID we would not be able to differentiate between sulfomucin positives IM (incomplete IM type IIb/III) and sulfomucin negatives IM (complete IM and IIa). However, we do not need to identify sulfomucins because the morphologic criteria from H&E stain is enough to properly classify the subtypes of IM. Incomplete IM frequently coexists with complete IM in the same sample. Moreover, the incomplete IM or the predominantly incomplete type correlates positively with cancer risk[28]

The extension of atrophic and metaplastic changes is also a determinant of cancer risk. Schemes to evaluate the extension of lesions are available.[43-45] On the other hand, it is well known that there is a strong correlation between the type and extension of the IM. Using 12 biopsy specimens,[16] it was found that extensive IM always display incomplete type of IM. In the updated Sydney System,[46] IM was graded according to morphology in normal, mild, moderate and marked but the type and extension are not clearly specified. The key issue related with extension of IM and suptyping of IM was reported by Cassaro et al.,[16] concluding that if extensive IM is observed (in four or more of 12 biopsy specimens) the determination of IM subtype is not needed, because this patient should be considered as being at risk for GC, irrespective of the IM subtype. On the other hand, when only a few biopsies are available for examination (as happens in clinical practice) the finding of incomplete IM foci may be used as a surrogate to indicate that extensive metaplastic changes have been taken place and, therefore, that the patient has an increased cancer risk.

According to this comprehensive review, most of the scientific evidence supports the utility of subtyping IM as a predictor of GC risk, identifying the sub-group of patients with incomplete IM as possible candidates for endoscopic surveillance. IM subtypes are well defined in the updated Sydney System original paper,[46] but in routine diagnostic practice, unfortunately, only a few pathologists specify IM subtypes in their reports. It is not because subtyping IM is a difficult or time consuming task, but merely because clinicians do not request IM subtyping diagnoses. However, that is not a reason to ignore that subtyping of IM is a relatively easy, cheap and valid procedure. Recognizing its usefulness by gastroenterologist should encourage pathologists to subtype IM.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Eric Duell for his comments and help in editing the article.

Ancillary