Human Cancer
In vitro anti-tumor activity of eosinophils from cancer patients treated with subcutaneous administration of interleukin 2. Role of interleukin 5
Article first published online: 17 JUL 2006
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910540103
Copyright © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rivoltini, L., Colombo, M. P., Parmiani, G., Viggiano, V., Spinazzè, S., Santoro, A. and Takatsu, K. (1993), In vitro anti-tumor activity of eosinophils from cancer patients treated with subcutaneous administration of interleukin 2. Role of interleukin 5. Int. J. Cancer, 54: 8–15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540103
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 17 JUL 2006
- Manuscript Revised: 12 DEC 1992
- Manuscript Received: 1 SEP 1992
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Interleukin 2 (IL-2) administration is known to induce marked eosinophilia. To evaluate the potential role of eosinophils as anti-tumor effectors and to understand the direct or indirect effects of IL-2 on eosinophils, the physical and functional characteristics of eosinophils obtained during IL-2 therapy were compared with those of eosinophils obtained from the same patients before IL-2 administration, or from healthy donors. The treatment schedule consisted of subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of IL-2, and was performed in 7 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in advanced stage. A marked increase of hypodense cells in peripheral blood was found to correlate with eosinophil activation in patients undergoing IL-2 therapy. Cyto-toxic activity of eosinophils against allogeneic tumor cells (SCLC, K562 and melanoma lines), as assessed by direct and antibody(Ab)-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), was markedly increased during IL-2 therapy. Conversely, eosinophils obtained before treatment, like those of healthy donors, lacked any activity against tumor cells. Sera from IL-2-treated, but not from untreated, patients, significantly improved the in vitro survival and anti-tumor cytotoxicity of eosinophils from healthy donors. Comparable effects were obtained with eosinophils cultured with interleukin 5 (IL-5), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and, to a lesser extent, by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), while no direct activity was mediated by IL-2. A 91% inhibition of eosinophil ADCC was found after pre-incubation of the sera of IL-2-treated patients with anti-IL-5 but not with anti-GM-CSF or anti-TNFα Ab. IL-5 mRNA expression was detected in peripheral-blood lymphocytes (PBL) obtained 4 hr after IL-2 injection during the second and third week of IL-2 therapy. Phenotypic analysis of eosinophils from IL-2-treated patients showed enhanced expression of activation markers, including Fcγ RII (CD32), HLA-DR, CR3 (CD I lb) and CRI (CD35). These findings suggest that a significant cytotoxicity against tumor cells can be mediated by eosinophils after indirect, IL-5-mediated in vivo activation by IL-2, and that eosinophils may be involved in the anti-tumor response(s) induced in vivo by IL-2.

1097-0215/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=45719cd7de57873027993264fcc568b335a8cd56)
1097-0215/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=5e0fba63c1309b3036eb9215a0e1e83dd02efd19)
1097-0215/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=9bea5e55449dab2cff7ad3b06277cc9745417a23)