SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abraham, C., Krahé, B., Dominic, R., & Frisch, I. (2002). Do health promotion messages target cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use? A content analysis of safer sex promotion leaflets in two countries. Britsh Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 227246.
  • Abraham, C., Sheeran, P., Norman, P., Conner, M., De Vries, N., & Otten, W. (1999). When good intentions are not enough: Modeling postdecisional cognitive correlates of condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 25912612.
  • Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M. H. (2005). A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 856897.
  • Ben-Ari, O. T., Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (2000). Does a threat appeal moderate reckless driving? A terror management theory perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32, 110.
  • Cooke, R., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations: A meta-analyses of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 159186.
  • De Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2007). The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 258285.
  • Earl, A., & Albarracín, D. (2007). Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: a meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 26, 496506.
  • Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407429.
  • Glock, S., Müller, B. C. N., & Ritter, S. M. (2013). Warning labels formulated as questions positively influence smoking-related risk perception. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 252262.
  • Goldenberg, J. L., & Arndt, J. (2008). The implications of death for health: A terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychological Review, 115, 10321053.
  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Schaal, B. (1998). Metacognition in action: The importance of implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 124136.
  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69119. doi: 10.1016/50065-2601(06)3800.
  • Good, A., & Abraham, C. (2011). Can the effectiveness of health promotion campaigns be improved using self-efficacy and self-affirmation interventions? An analysis of sun protection messages. Psychology & Health, 26, 799818.
  • Hammond, D. (2011). Health warning messages on tobacco products: A review. Tobacco Control, 20, 327337.
  • Hansen, J., Winzeler, S., & Topolinski, S. (2010). When the death makes you smoker: A terror management perspective on the effectiveness of cigarette on-pack warnings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 226228.
  • Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2009). The impact of self-affirmation on health cognition, health behaviour and other health-related responses: A narrative review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 962978.
  • Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2010). The impact of self-affirmation on health-related cognition and health behaviour: Issues and prospects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 439454.
  • Harris, P. R., & Napper, L. (2005). Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51, 12501263.
  • Harris, P. R., Mayle, K., Mabbott, L., & Napper, L. (2007). Self-affirmation reduces smokers' defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. Health Psychology, 26, 437446.
  • Kessels, L. T. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Jansma, B. M. (2010). Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: Neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychology, 29, 346354.
  • Kessels, L. T. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., Wouters, L., & Jansma, B. M. (2014). Neuroscientific evidence for defensive avoidance of fear appeals. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 8088.
  • Klein, W. M. P., & Harris, P. R. (2009). Self-affirmation enhances attentional bias toward threatening components of a persuasive message. Psychological Science, 20, 14631467.
    Direct Link:
  • Kok, G., Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Gottlieb, N. H., & Fernandez, M. E. (2014). Finding theory- and evidence-based alternatives to fear appeals: Intervention Mapping. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 98107.
  • Leventhal, H., Singer, R., & Jones, S. (1965). Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 2029.
  • Marteau, T. M., & Hall, S. (2001). EU's anti-smoking stance needs to be more than frightening (letter to the editor). British Medical Journal, 323, 635.
  • Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 106143.
  • Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2012). Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(Suppl.1), S8S31. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527.
  • Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2014). Threatening communication: A qualitative study of fear appeal effectiveness beliefs among intervention developers, policymakers, politicians, scientists, and advertising professionals. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 7179.
  • Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Rogers, R. W., & Deckner, C. W. (1975). Effects of fear appeals and physiological arousal upon emotion, attitudes, and cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 222230.
  • Ruiter, R. A. C., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613630.
  • Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2005). Saying is not (always) doing: Cigarette warning labels are useless. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 329.
  • Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2006). Response to Hammond et al. Showing leads to doing, but doing what? The need for experimental pilot-testing. European Journal of Public Health, 16, 225.
  • Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 11, 119123.
    Direct Link:
  • Süssenbach, P., Niemeier, S., & Glock, S. (2013). Effects of and attention to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. Psychology and Health, 28, 11921206. doi:10.1080/08870446.2013.799161.
  • Van't Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7(Suppl. 1), S104S136.
  • Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioural intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249268.
  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591615.
  • Witte, K., Meyer, G., & Martell, D. (2001). Effective health risk messages: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R. (2009). Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: Factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 365373.