SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abromeit, Heidrun (1998). Democracy in Europe: Legitimising Politics in a Non-State Polity, New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Dan Rodrick (1992). “Distribution, political conflict, and economic growth: A simple theory and some empirical evidence”, in AlexCukierman, ZviHercowitz, and LeonardoLeiderman (eds.), Political economy, growth, and business cycles., Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, pp. 2350.
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Roberto Perotti (1994). “The political economy of growth: A critical survey of the recent literature”, World Bank Economic Review 8(3): 351371.
  • Bernholz, Peter (1990a). “The completion of the European market: Opportunities and dangers from an institutional perspective”, in C.E.P.S. (eds.), The Macroeconomics of 1992. Bruxelles: C.E.P.S. Paper No. 42.
  • Bernholz, Peter (1990b). “Grundzüge einer europäischen Verfassung: Ein Bundesstaat mit begrenzter Zentralgewalt?”, in Frankfurter Institut (ed.). Argumente zur Europapolitik 3: 212.
  • Bernholz, Peter (1993). “Institutional aspects of European integration”, in SilvioBorner and HerbertGrubel (Hrsg.). EC after 1992: Perspective From the Outside. London: McMillan Publishing Company.
  • Bernholz, Peter, Friedrich Schneider, Roland Vaubel, and Frank Vibert (2004). “An alternative constitutional treaty for the European Union”, Public Choice 118(3–4): 451468.
  • Blankart, Charles B. and Dennis C.Mueller (eds.) (2004a). A Constitution for the European Union. London: MIT Press.
  • Blankart, Charles B. and Dennis C. Mueller (2004b). “Welche Aspekte sollen in einer Verfassung der EU berücksichtigt werden, und welche nicht? Eine ökonomische Betrachtung”, IFO Schnelldienst 56(1): 515.
  • Blöchliger, Hans-Jörg, and René L. Frey (1992). “Der Schweizerische Föderalismus: Ein Modell für den institutionellen Aufbau der europäischen Union?”, Außenwirtschaft 47(3): 515548.
  • Brennan, Geoffrey, and James Buchanan (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1990). Europe's Constitutional Opportunity. Fairfax: Virginia Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University.
  • Buchanan, James M. (1995). “Federalism as an ideal political order and an objective for constitutional reform”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25(2): 1927.
  • Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Buchanan, James, and Roger Faith (1987). “Secession and the limits of taxation: Toward a theory of internal exit”, American Economic Review 91(5): 10231031.
  • de Haan, Jakob, and C.L.J. Siermann (1995). “A sensitivity analysis of the impact of democracy on economic growth”, Empirical Economics 20(1): 197215.
  • de Haan, Jakob, and C.L.J. Siermann (1996). “New evidence on the relationship between democracy and economic growth”, Public Choice 86(2): 175198.
  • Delors, Jacques (1991). The principle of subsidiarity: contribution to the debate, European Institute of Public Administration, pp. 718.
  • Denzau, Arthur T. (1985). “Constitutional change and agenda control”, Carnegie Papers on Political Economy 47: 183217.
  • Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. London: Harper & Row.
  • European Commission (1993). “Report to the European Council on the adaptation of existing legislation to the subsidiarity principle”, Com (93). Bruxelles: European Union.
  • European Constitutional Group (1993). A Proposal for a European Constitution, Report by the European Constitutional Group, ed. by European Policy Forum, London.
  • European Constitutional Group (2003). A Basic “Constitutional” Treaty for the European Union - with Comments, unpublished manuscript, Berlin, June, 8, 2003.
  • Eichenberger, Reiner (1994). “The benefits of federalism and the risk of overcentralization”, Kyklos 47(3): 403420.
  • Feld, Lars P. (2003). “Eine Europäische Verfassung aus polit-ökonomischer Sicht”, ORDO 54: 289317.
  • Feld, Lars P. (2005). “The European Constitution project from the perspective of constitutional political economy”, Public Choice 122(3–4): 417448.
  • Feld, Lars P., and Gebhard Kirchgässner (1996). “Omne agends agendo perficitur: The economic meaning of subsidiarity”. In RobertHolzmann (ed.), Maastricht: Monetary Constitution Without a Fiscal Constitution?., Baden-Baden: Nomos Publishing Company, pp. 195226.
  • Feld, Lars P. and Gebhard Kirchgässner (1999). “Public Debt and Budgetary Procedures: Top Down or Bottom up? Some Evidence from Swiss Municipalities”. In James M.Poterba and JürgenVonHagen (eds.), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance., Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 151179.
  • Feld, Lars P., and Gebhard Kirchgässner (2000). “Direct Democracy, Political Culture and the Outcome of Economic Policy: A Report on the Swiss Experience”, European Journal of Political Economy 16(2): 287306.
  • Feld, Lars P., and Gebhard Kirchgässner (2001a). “The Political Economy of Direct Legislation: Direct Democracy and Local Decision-Making”, Economic Policy 16(33): 329367.
    Direct Link:
  • Feld, Lars P., and Gebhard Kirchgässner (2001b). “Does Direct Democracy Reduce Public Debt? Evidence from Swiss Municipalities”, Public Choice 109(3–4): 347370.
  • Feld, Lars P. and Gebhard Kirchgässner (2004). “The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union”. In Charles B.Blankart und Dennis C.Mueller (eds.), A Constitution for the European Union., Cambridge/London: MIT Press, pp. 203235.
  • Frey, Bruno S. (1994). “Direct democracy: Politico-economic lessons from Swiss experience”, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 84(2): 338342.
  • Frey, Bruno S., and Iris Bohnet (1994a). “The Swiss experience with referenda and federalism”, IDIOMA, Revue de linguistique et des traductology 10(2): 147160.
  • Frey, Bruno S., and Iris Bohnet (1994b). “Direct democratic rules: The role of discussion”, Kyklos 47(3): 341354.
  • Frey, Bruno S., and Friedrich Schneider (1997). “Warum wird die Umweltökonomik kaum angewendet?”, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 20(2): 153170.
  • Genser, Bernd (1992). “Tax competition and harmonization in federal economies”, in Hans-JürgenVosgerau (ed.), European Integration in the World Economy., Heidelberg: Springer Publishing Company, pp. 184205.
  • Gwartney, J.D., and Richard E. Wagner (1988). Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, Greenwich (Conn.): J. A. I. Press.
  • Holzmann, Robert (ed.) (1996). Maastricht: Monetary Constitution without a fiscal constitution? Baden-Baden: Nomos-Publishing Company.
  • Horstmann, Winfried, and Friedrich Schneider (1994). “Deficits, bailout and free riders: fiscal elements of a European constitution”, Kyklos 47(3): 355383.
  • Kirchgässner, Gebhard (1994). “Constitutional economics and its relevance for the evolution of rules”, Kyklos 47(3): 321339.
  • Kirchgässner, Gebhard und Werner W. Pommerehne (1996). “Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European Union: Lessons from Switzerland”, Journal of Public Economics 60(3): 351371.
  • König, Thomas und Thomas Bräuniger (1999). “The institutional policies of enlargement: Diverging goals for reforming EU legislation”, in BernhardSteunenberg (ed.), Enlargement and new membership of the European Union., Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer academic publishers, pp. 145172.
  • Levmore, Samuel (1992). “Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one?”, International Review of Law and Economics 12(1): 145162.
  • Möschel, Werner (1993). “Eine Verfassungskonzeption über die Europäische Union”, in HerbertGröner and AndreasSchüller (eds.), Die Europäische Integration als ordnungspolitische Aufgabe., Stuttgart: Verlag Gustav Fischer, pp. 2139.
  • Möschel, Werner (1995). “Subsidiaritätsprinzip im Zwielicht”, WiSt Heft 5: 232236.
  • Moser, Peter, and Gerald Schneider (1997). “Rational choice and the governance structure of the European Union: An introduction”, Außenwirtschaft 52(1–2): 6482.
  • Mueller, Dennis C. (1987). “The growth of government: A public choice perspective”, Washington D.C. IMF-Staff papers 34(1): 115149.
  • Mueller, Dennis C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mueller, Dennis C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oates, Wallace E. (ed.) (1977). The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Massachusetts: Lexington.
  • Oates, Wallace E. (1985). “Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study”, American Economic Review 75(4): 578583.
  • Olson, Mancur (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagnation and Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Olson, Mancur (1983). “The political economy of comparative growth rate”, in Dennis C.Mueller (ed.), The Political Economy of Growth., New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 222247.
  • Peden, E.A., and M. Bradley (1989). “Government size, productivity and economic growth: The post war experience”, Public Choice 61(3): 229245.
  • Persson, T., G. Roland, and Guido Tabellini (1997). “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability”, Working Paper No. 136, Center for Economic Studies at the University of Munich, June 1997.
  • Peters, Thorsten, (1996a). “Decision-Making after the EU-Intergovernmental conference”, European Law Journal 2(3): 251266.
  • Peters, Thorsten, (1996b). “Voting Power after the enlargement and options for decision making in the European Union”, Außernwirtschaft 51(11): 223243.
  • Piris, Jean-Claude, (2005). “Does the European Union have a constitution? Does it need one?”, Jean Monnet Center NYU School of Law, European University Institute, URL: http:www.jeanmonnetprogram.orgpapers00000501.html.
  • Pommerehne, Werner W., Gebhard Kirchgässner, and Lars P. Feld (1996). “Tax harmonization and tax competition at the state-local levels: Lessons from Switzerland”, in G.Pola, R.Levaggi and G.Francke (eds.) New Issues in Local Government Finance: Theory and Policy., Aldersshot: Edward Elgar, pp. 201255.
  • Posner, Robert (1987). “The constitution as an economic document”, George Washington Law Review 56(1): 438.
  • Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1992). “Für Wachstumsorientierung gegen lähmenden Verteilungsstreit”, Jahresgutachten 1992/93, Stuttgart: Verlag Poeschl.
  • Schneider, Friedrich (1993). “The federal and fiscal structures of representative and direct democracies as models for a European federal union: Some ideas using the public choice approach”, European Economy Report and Studies 5, Bruxelles: 191212.
  • Schneider, Friedrich (1996). “The design of a minimal European federal union: Some ideas using the public choice approach”, in José CasasPardo and FriedrichSchneider (eds.) Current Issues in Public Choice., Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, pp. 203222.
  • Schneider, Friedrich (2003). “A Federal European Constitution for an Enlarged European Union? Some Insights from Constitutional Economics”, in: BernhardSteunenberg (ed.), Widening the European Union: The politics of institutional change and reform. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Schneider, Friedrich, and Bruno S. Frey (1988). “Politico-economic models of macro economic policy: The political economy of money, inflation and employment”, in WillettThomas (ed.), The Political Business Cycle., Durham & London: Duke University Press, pp. 239275.
  • Sinn, Hans-Werner (1990). “Tax harmonization and tax competition in Europe”, European Economic Review 34(4): 489504.
  • Steunenberg, Bernhard (1994). “Decision-Making under different institutional arrangements: Legislation by the European Community”, Journal of Institution and Theoretical Economics 150(3): 642663.
  • Tabellini, Guido (2003a). Will it Last? An Economic Perspective on the Constitutional Treaty, Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Università Bocconi, Mailand.
  • Tabellini, Guido (2003b). “Principles of Policy-Making in the European Union: An Economic Perspective”, CESifo Economic Studies 49: 75102.
  • Tollison, Robert D. (1982). “Rent-seeking: A survey”, Kyklos 25(4): 575602.
  • Tullock, Gordon (1967). “The welfare costs of tariff, monopolies and theft”, Western Economic Journal 5(3): 224232.
  • Vanberg, Viktor (1994). “Subsidiarity, responsive government and individual liberty”, in Wolfgang KnutNörr and ThomasOppernmann (eds.) Subsidiarität: Idee und Wirklichkeit zur Reichweite eines Prinzips in Deutschland und Europa., Tübingen: Publishing Company J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 253269.
  • Vanberg, Viktor, and James M. Buchanan (1989). “Interests and theories in constitutional choice”, Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(1): 4962.
  • Vaubel, Roland (1993). “Perspektiven der europäischen Integration: Die politische Ökonomie der Vertiefung und Erweiterung”, in HorstSiebert (ed.), Die zweifache Integration: Deutschland und Europa., Tübingen: Verlag J. C. Mohr, pp. 331.
  • Vaubel, Roland (1995). “Constitutional safeguards against centralization in federal states: An international cross-section analysis”, Discussion Paper 532/95, Beiträge zur Angewandten Wirtschaftsforschung, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim (Germany).
  • Vaubel, Roland (1996). “Constitutional Saveguards against Centralisatzion in Federal States: An International Grors-Section Analysis”, Constitutional Political Economy 7(1): 79102.
  • Vaubel, Roland (2003). “Europa droht eine Regulierungsspirale: Der Verfassungsentwurf begünstigt die Ausweitung europäischer Gesetzgebung auf Kosten der Bürger”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Nr. 157 vom 10. Juli 2003, p. 12.
  • Vaubel, Roland (2004). Reformen der Europäischen Politikverflechtung, 3. revidierte Fassung, Walter Eucken Instiut, Universität Feiburg.
  • Voigt, Stefan (2003). “Towards ever more confusion? The convention's proposal for European Constitutions”, Intereconomics 38(4): 185198.
  • Weede, Erich (1986). “Catch-up distributional coalitions and government growth or decline in industrialized democracies”, The British Journal of Sociology 37(2): 194220.
  • Weede, Erich (1990). Wirtschaft, Staat und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Publishing Company J.C.B. Mohr.
  • Weingast, Barry (1993). “Constitutions as governance structures: The political foundations of secure markets”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149(3): 286311.