SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Austin, J. (1976). How to Do Things with Words (Urmson, J. and M.Sbisà eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bara, J. (2001a). Tracking Estimates of Public Opinion and Party Policy Intentions in Britain and the USA. In Laver, M. (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge (21636).
  • Bara, J. (2001b). Using Manifesto Estimates to Validate Computerised Analyses. In Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and E.Tanenbaum (eds.), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945--1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press (14356).
  • Bara, J. (2005). With a Little Help from our Friends: An Analysis of the Transfer of Policy Expressions between British and American Parties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1--4 September, 2005, Washington, US.
  • Bara, J. (2006). Do Parties Reflect Public Concerns. In Bara, J. and A.Weale (eds.), Democratic Politics and Party Competition. London: Routledge (10524).
  • Benoit, K. and M. Laver (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
  • Bessette, J. (1994). The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Brugidou, M. (2003). Argumentation and Values: An Analysis of Ordinary Political Competence via an Open-Ended Questionnaire. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15(4): 41330.
  • Budge, I. et al. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945--1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cowley, P. (ed.) (1998). Conscience and Parliament. London: Frank Cass.
  • Dryzek, J. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29(5): 65169.
  • Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
  • Greenacre, M. (1994). Correspondence Analysis and its Interpretation. In Greenacre, M. and J.Blasius (eds.), Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. London: Academic Press (322).
  • Guérin-Pace, F. (1998). Textual Statistics: An Exploratory Tool for the Social Sciences. Population: An English Selection 10(1): 7395.
  • Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Gutmann, A. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms (Rehg, W. transl.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Klingemann, H-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and M. McDonald, (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990--2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lascher, E. (1996). Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis. Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(4): 50119.
  • Laver, M and J. Garry (2000). Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 61933.
  • Laver, M., Benoit, K. and J. Garry (2003). Extracting Policy Positions form Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97(2): 31131.
  • Lovenduski, J. (1986). Parliament, Pressure Groups, Networks and the Women's Movement: The Politics of Abortion Law Reform in Britain (1967--83). In Lovenduski, J. and J.Outshoorn (eds.), The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage (23156).
  • Lovenduski, J. and J.Outshoorn (eds.) (1986). The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage.
  • Marsh, D. and J. Chambers (1981). Abortion Politics. London: Junction Books.
  • Marsh, D. and M. Read (1988). Private Members' Bills. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
  • McLean, I. (2001). Rational Choice and British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McLean, I. (2006) The Dimensionality of Party Ideologies. In Bara, J. and A.Weale (eds.), Democratic Politics and Party Competition. London: Routledge (12742).
  • Namier, L. (1957). The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London: Macmillan.
  • Reinert, M. (2005). Alceste: Manuel d'utilitisation. Toulouse: Image.
  • Riker, W. (1996). The Strategy of Rhetoric. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006). Dimensionality in Debating and Voting: The case of the partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Paper presented at the Conference of Comparative Analysis of Legislative behaviour, 14--15 April, 2006, San Diego, US.
  • Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2005). Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry's National Security Speeches. Political Science and Politics 38(4): 70111.
  • Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006). From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Searle, J. (1970). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, J. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science: The 1984 Reith Lectures. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Skinner, Q. (1972). Social Meaning and the Explanation of Social Action. In Laslett, P. and W.Runciman (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society 4th series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (13657).
  • Skinner, Q. (1974). Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought. Political Theory 2(3): 277303.
  • Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. and M. Steenbergen (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weale, A., Bicquelet, A. and J. Bara (2007). Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy. Unpublished paper.
  • Uhr, J. (1998). Deliberative Democracy in Australia. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.