SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aitken RJ. The human spermatozoon—A cell in crisis? J Reprod Fertil. 1999;115: 17.
  • Auger J., Eustache F., Ducot B., et al. Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentrations, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories. Hum Reprod. 2000;15: 23602368.
  • Auger J., Kunstmann JM, Czyglik F., Jouannet P.. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Engl J Med. 1995;332: 281285.
  • Carlsen E., Giwercman A., Keiding N., Skakkebæk NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past 50 years. Br Med J. 1992; 305: 609613.
  • Davis RO, Katz DF. Standardization and comparability of CASA instruments. J Androl. 1992;13: 8186.
  • Donoghue AM, Thistlethwaite D., Donoghue DJ, Kirby JD. A new method for rapid determination of sperm concentration in turkey semen. Poultry Sci. 1996;75: 785789.
  • Downing TW, Garner DL, Ericsson SA, Redelman D.. Metabolic toxicity of fluorescent stains on thawed cryopreserved bovine sperm cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1991;39: 485489.
  • Eustache F., Jouannet P., Auger J.. Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration. J Androl. 2001;22: 558567.
  • Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z., Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science. 1980;210: 11311133.
  • Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z., Melamed MR. Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem. 1982;30: 279280.
  • Evenson DP, Parks JE, Kaproth MT, Jost LK. Rapid determination on sperm cell concentration in bovine semen by flow cytometry. J Dairy Sci. 1993;76: 8694.
  • Fenton SE, Ax RL, Cowan CM, Coyle T., Gilbert GR, Lenz RW. Validation and application of an assay for deoxyribonucleic acid to estimate concentrations of bull sperm. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73: 31183125.
  • Foote RH, Arriola J., Wall RJ. Principles and procedures for photometric measurement of sperm cell concentration. In: Proceedings of the 7th Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Reproduction. Madison, Wis: National Association of Animal Breeders; 1978; 5561.
  • Freund M., Carol B.. Factors affecting hemacytometer counts of sperm concentration in human semen. J Reprod Fertil. 1964;8: 149155.
  • Fuller WA. Measurement Error Models. Section 1.3. New York: Willey; 1987.
  • Garner DL, Johnson LA. Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod. 1995;53: 276284.
  • Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, Roth BL, Haugland RP. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J Androl. 1994;15: 620629.
  • Garner DL, Pinkel D., Johnson LA, Pace MM. Assessment of spermatozoal function using dual fluorescent staining and flow cytometric analyses. Biol Reprod. 1986;34: 127138.
  • Garner DL, Thomas CA, Joerg HW, DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE. Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1997;57: 14011406.
  • Gledhill BL, Lake S., Steinmetz LL, Gray JW, Crawford J.R., Dean PN, van Dilla MA. Flow micro fluorometric analysis of sperm DNA content: Effect of cell shape on the fluorescence distribution. J Cell Physiol. 1976;87: 36775.
  • Graham JK. In vitro assays of bull fertility. In: Proceedings of the 15th Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Reproduction. Milwaukee, Wis: National Association of Animal Breeders; 1994: 7481.
  • Graham JK. Assessment of sperm quality: A flow cytometric approach. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001;68: 239247.
  • Graham JK, Kunze E., Hammerstedt RH. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol Reprod. 1990;43: 5564.
  • Hansen C., Christensen P., Stryhn H., Hedeboe AM, Rode M., Boe-Hansen G.. Validation of the FACSCount AF system for determination of sperm concentration in boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2002;37: 330334.
  • Holt W., Watson PF, Curry M., Holt C.. Reproducibility of computer-aided semen analysis: Comparison of five different systems used in a practical workshop. Fertil Steril. 1994;62: 12771282.
  • Irvine DS, Cawood E., Richardson D., MacDonald E., Aitken RJ. Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: Birth cohort study of 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. Br Med J. 1996;312: 467471.
  • Krause W., Schönhärl G., Brake A.. The variability of measuring sperm concentration and motility as determined by computer assisted image analysis and visual estimation. Andrologia. 1993;25: 181187.
  • Matson PL. Clinical value of tests for assessing male infertility. Clin Obstr Gynaecol. 1997;11: 641654.
  • Morrell JM. Applications of flow cytometry to artificial insemination: A review. Vet Rec. 1991;129: 375378.
  • Parks JE. Applications of flow cytometry in semen processing and handling. In: Proceedings of the 14th Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Reproduction. Milwaukee, Wis: National Association of Animal Breeders; 1992; 1217.
  • Stewart CC, Steinkamp JA. Quantitation of cell concentration using the flow cytometer. Cytometry. 1982;2: 23843.
  • Strauss K., Hannet I., Engels S., et al. Performance evaluation of the FACSCount System: A dedicated system for clinical cellular analysis. Cytometry. 1996;26: 5259.
  • Thomas CA, Garner DL, DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE. Fluorometric assessments of acrosomal integrity and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1997;56: 991998.
  • Tsuji T., Okada H., Fujisawa M., Hamaguchi Y., Kamidono S.. Automated sperm concentration analysis with a new flow cytometry-based device, S-FCM. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117: 401408.
  • Vetter CM, Miller JE, Crawford LM, Armstrong MJ, Clair JH, Conner MW, Wise LD, Skopek TR. Comparison of motility and membrane integrity to assess rat sperm viability. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12: 105114.
  • Weitze KF. Long-term storage of extended boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 1991;(suppl 1): 145164.
  • Woelders H.. Overview of in vitro methods for evaluation of semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim Suppl. 1991: 145164.
  • Organization World Health. Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  • Yamamoto T., Mori S., Yoneyama M., Imanishi M., Takeuchi M.. Evaluation of rat sperm by flow cytometry: Simultaneous analysis of sperm count and sperm viability. J Toxicol Sci. 1998;23: 373378.