2161-1939/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=abf0565027f756083f869d1eeb4c67aaf20c2cb3)
Rejoinder to V. Suthakaran
Article first published online: 8 OCT 2012
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2012.00025.x
© 2012 by the American Counseling Association. All rights reserved.
Issue
The Journal of Humanistic Counseling
Special Issue: Humanism Redefined
Volume 51, Issue 2, pages 241–245, October 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
HANSEN, J. T. (2012), Rejoinder to V. Suthakaran. Jrnl Humanistic Counseling, 51: 241–245. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2012.00025.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 8 OCT 2012
- Received 10/01/11; Revised 10/01/1; Accepted 10/19/11
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
V. Suthakaran (2012) uses cognitive–experiential self-theory as the basis for his argument that the humanities and science should have equal ideological status in the counseling profession. The author disagrees with this basic thesis and some of the related theoretical points that V. Suthakaran makes. However, the author agrees that the humanities and science should both be integral ideological components of the counseling profession.