SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Adamowicz W, Swait J, Boxall P, Louviere J, Williams M. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 6584.
  • Arora N, Huber J. 2001. Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments. Journal of Consumer Research 28: 273283.
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A. 1995. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63: 841890.
  • Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Luce MF, Payne JW. 1993. Correlation, conflict and choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19: 931951.
  • Brownstone D, Train K. 1999. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 89: 109129.
  • Chaloner K, Verdinelli I. 1995. Bayesian experimental design: a review. Statistical Science 10(3): 273304.
  • Dellaert BGC, Brazell JD, Louviere JJ. 1999. The effect of attribute variation on consumer choice consistency, Marketing Letters 10: 139147.
  • DeShazo J, Fermo G. 2002. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123143.
  • Huber J, Zwerina K. 1996. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice design. Journal of Marketing Research 33: 307317.
  • Johnson E, Payne J. 1985. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science 31: 395414.
  • Layton D, Brown G. 2000. Heterogenous preferences regarding global climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 616624.
  • Louviere J. 2003. Complex statistical choice models: are the assumptions true, and if not, what are the consequences? Presented at Discrete Choice Workshop in Health Economics, University of Oxford.
  • Louviere J, Woodworth G. 1983. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 350367.
  • Mazzotta MJ, Opaluch J. 1995. Decision making when choices are complex: a test of Heiner's Hypothesis. Land Economics 71: 500515.
  • McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447470.
  • Niederreiter H. 1992. Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. SIAM: Philadelphia; PA.
  • Owen A. 1995. Randomly permuted (t,m,s)-nets and (t,s)-sequences. In Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing, NiederreiterH, ShiuePJ-S (eds). Springer: New York; 299317.
  • Revelt D, Train K. 1998. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 647657.
  • Rubinstein A. 1998. Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
  • San-Miguel F, Ryan M, Scott A. 2002. Are preferences stable? The case of health care. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48: 114.
  • Sándor Z, Train K. 2004. Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models. Transportation Research B 38: 313327.
  • Sándor Z, Wedel M. 2005. Heterogeneous Bayesian conjoint choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 42: 210218.
  • Scott A. 2001. Eliciting GP's preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. Journal of Health Economics 20: 329347.
  • Small KE, Winston C, Yan J. 2005. Uncovering the distribution of motorists' preferences for travel time and reliability. Econometrica 73: 13671382.
  • Street D, Burgess L. 2004. Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 118: 185199.
  • Swait J, Adamowicz W. 2001. The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching. Journal of Consumer Research 28: 135148.
  • Toubia O, Hauser JR, Simester DI. 2004. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 41: 116131.
  • Tyebjee T. 1979. Response time, conflict and involvement in brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research 6: 295304.
  • van Ophem H, Stam P, van Praag B. 1999. Multichoice logit: modeling incomplete preference rankings of classical concerts. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 17: 117128.