SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Argys LM, Rees DI, Brewer DJ. 1996. Detracking America's schools: equity at zero cost? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(4): 623645.
  • Armor DJ. 1995. Forced Justice: School Desegregation and the Law. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Behrman JR, Rosenzweig MR. 2002. Does increasing women's schooling raise the schooling of the next generation? American Economic Review 92(1): 323334.
  • Benabou R. 1993. Workings of a city: location, education, and production. Quarterly Journal of Economics 434(3): 619652.
  • Benabou R. 1996. Heterogeneity, stratification, and growth: macroeconomic implications of community structure and school finance. American Economic Review 86(3): 584609.
  • Brock WA, Durlauf SN. 2001. Interactions-based models. In Handbook of Econometrics, HeckmanJJ, LeamerEE (eds). North-Holland: Amsterdam; 32973380.
  • Caucutt EM. 2002. Educational policy when there are peer group effects—size matters. International Economic Review 43(1): 195222.
  • Coleman JS, Campbell EQ, Hobson CJ, McPartland J, Mood AM, Weinfeld FD, York RL. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
  • de Bartolome CAM. 1990. Equilibrium and inefficiency in a community model with peer group effects. Journal of Political Economy 98(1): 110133.
  • Epple D, Romano RE. 1998. Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. American Economic Review 88(1): 3362.
  • Hanushek EA. 1972. Education and Race: An Analysis of the Educational Production Process. Health-Lexington: Cambridge, MA.
  • Hanushek EA. 1979. Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources 14(3): 351388.
  • Hanushek EA. 1992. The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy 100(1): 84117.
  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF. 1972. On the value of ‘equality of educational opportunity’ as a guide to public policy. In On Equality of Educational Opportunity, MostellerF, MoynihanDP (eds). Random House: New York; 116145.
  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG. Forthcoming. Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: the costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics.
  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG. 2002. Inferring program effects for specialized populations: does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? Review of Economics and Statistics 84(4): 584599.
  • Henderson V, Mieszkowski P, Sauvageau Y. 1976. Peer Group Effects and Educational Production Functions. Economic Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  • Hoxby CM. 2000. The effects of class size on student achievement: new evidence from population variation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 12391285.
  • Katz LF, Kling JR, Liebman JB. 2001. Moving to opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 607654.
  • Lazear EP. 2001. Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(3): 777803.
  • Ludwig J, Duncan GJ, Hirschfield P. 2001. Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 655679.
  • Manski CF. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60(July): 531542.
  • Mayer SE. 1997. What Money Can't Buy: Family Income and Children's Life Chances. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Mayer SE, Jencks C. 1989. Growing up in poor neighborhoods: how much does it matter? Science 243(March 17): 14411445.
  • Moffitt RA. 2001. Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions. In Social Dynamics, DurlaufS, Peyton YoungH (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; 4582.
  • Oakes J. 1992. Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher 21(4): 1221.
  • O'Regan KM, Quigley JM. 1999. Accessibility and economic opportunity. In Essays in Transportation Economics, WinstonC, Gomez-IbanezJA, TyeW (eds). Brookings Institution: Washington, DC; 436468.
  • Rivkin SG, Hanushek EA, Kain JF. 2001. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Working Paper No. 6691, National Bureau of Economic Research (revised).
  • Rosenbaum JE. 1995. Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux Program. Housing Policy Debate 6(1): 231269.
  • Rosenbaum JE, Popkin SJ. 1991. Employment and earnings of low-income blacks who move to middle-class suburbs. In The Urban Underclass, JencksC, PetersonPE (eds). Brookings Institution: Washington, DC; 342356.
  • Sacerdote B. 2001. Peer effects with random assignment: results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 681704.
  • Smith M. 1972. Equality of educational opportunity: the basic findings reconsidered. In On Equality of Educational Opportunity, MostellerF, MoynihanDP (eds). Random House: New York; 230342.
  • Summers AA, Wolfe BL. 1977. Do schools make a difference? American Economic Review 67(4): 639652.
  • Zimmer RW, Toma EF. 2000. Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(1): 7592.