SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abadie A. 1997. Changes in the Spanish labor income structure during the 1980's: a quantile regression approach. Investigaciones Economicas 21: 253272.
  • Autor D, Katz L, Krueger A. 1998. Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 11691213.
  • Bassett G, Koenker R. 1982. An empirical quantile function for linear models with i.i.d. errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 407415.
  • Bassett G, Koenker R. 1986. Strong consistency of regression quantiles and related empirical processes. Econometric Theory 2: 191201.
  • Blau F, Kahn L. 1996. International differences in male wage inequality: institutions versus market forces. Journal of Political Economy 104: 791837.
  • Borjas G, Ramey V. 1995. Foreign competition, market power and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 10751110.
  • Bound J, Johnson G. 1992. Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980's. American Economic Review 82: 371392.
  • Bresnaham T. 1999. Computerisation and wage dispersion: an analytical reinterpretation. The Economic Journal 109: F390F415.
  • Buchinsky M. 1994. Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963–1987: an application of quantile regression. Econometrica 62: 405458.
  • Buchinsky M. 1995. Quantile regression, Box–Cox transformation model, and the U.S. wage structure, 1963–1987. Journal of Econometrics 65: 109154.
  • Buchinsky M. 1998. The dynamics of change in the female wage distribution in the USA: a quantile regression approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 13: 130.
  • Cardoso A. 1998. Earnings inequality in Portugal: high and rising? Review of Income and Wealth 44: 325343.
  • Chamberlain G. 1994. Quantile regression, censoring and the structure of wages. In Advances in Econometrics, SinsC (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 171209.
  • Chay K, Lee D. 2000. Changes in relative wages in the 1980's: returns to observed and unobserved skills and black–white wage differentials. Journal of Econometrics 99: 138.
  • DiNardo J, Fortin N, Lemieux T. 1996. Labor Market Institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semi parametric approach. Econometrica 64: 10011044.
  • Donald S, Green D, Paarsch H. 2000. Differences in the wage distributions between Canada and the United States: an application of a flexible estimator of the distribution function in the presence of covariates. Review of Economic Studies 67: 609633.
    Direct Link:
  • Fitzenberger B, Kurz C. 1997. New insights on earnings trends across skill groups and industries in West Germany. Universität Konstanz, mimeo.
  • Fortin N, Lemieux T. 2000. Rank regressions, wage distributions, and the gender gap. The Journal of Human Resources XXXIII: 610643.
  • Garcia J, Hernández P, López-Nicolás A. 2001. How wide is the gap? An investigation of gender wage differences using quantile regression. Empirical Economics 26: 149167.
  • González X, Miles D. 2001. Wage inequality in a developing country: decrease in minimum wage or increase in education returns. Empirical Economics 26: 135148.
  • Gosling A, Machin S, Meghir C. 2000. The changing distribution of male wages in the U.K. Review of Economic Studies 67: 635666.
    Direct Link:
  • Gottschalk P, Smeeding T. 1997. Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 633687.
  • He X. 1997. Quantile curves without crossing. The American Statistician 51: 186192.
  • Hendricks W, Koenker R. 1992. Hierarchical spline models for conditional quantiles and the demand for electricity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87: 5868.
  • Johnson G. 1997. Changes in earnings inequality: the role of demand shifts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 4154.
  • Juhn C, Murphy K, Pierce B. 1993. Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy 101: 410441.
  • Koenker R, Bassett G. 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46: 3350.
  • Koenker R, Bassett G. 1982. Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica 50: 4361.
  • Koenker R, Hallock K. 2000. Quantile regression: an introduction. http://www.econ.uiuc.edu/roger/intro/intro.html.
  • Levy F, Murmane R. 1992. U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: a review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30: 13331381.
  • Mata J, Machado J. 1996. Firm start-up size: a conditional quantile approach. European Economic Review 40: 13051323.
  • Machado J, Mata J. 2000. Box–Cox quantile regression and the distribution of firm sizes. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 253274.
  • Machado J, Mata J. 2001. Earning functions in Portugal: evidence from quantile regressions. Empirical Economics 26: 115134.
  • Martins MF. 2001. Parametric and semiparametric estimation of sample selection models: an empirical application to the female labour supply in Portugal. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 2339.
  • Mills J, Zandvakili S. 1997. Statistical inference via bootstrapping for measures of inequality. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 133150.
  • Nielsen H, Rosholm M. 2001. The public–private sector wage gap in Zambia? A quantile regression approach. Empirical Economics 26: 169182.
  • Oaxaca R. 1973. Male–female differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review 14: 693709.
  • Oja H. 1981. On location, scale, skewness and kurtosis of univariate distributions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8: 154168.
  • Ruppert D. 1987. What is kurtosis? An influence function approach. The American Statistician 41: 15.
  • Silverman B. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hal: London.
  • Statistical Sciences. 1995. S-PLUS User's Manual, Version 3.3 for Windows. Statistical Sciences, Inc: Seattle.
  • Topel R. 1997. Factor proportions and relative wages; the supply side determinants of wage inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 5574.