Technical Note
Imaging of blood plasma coagulation and its propagation at surfaces
Article first published online: 28 SEP 2007
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31529
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue
1552-4965/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=011c87cf5752a576bd0f779f7aac1276867c523a)
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Volume 85A, Issue 4, pages 1129–1134, 15 June 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Faxälv, L., Tengvall, P. and Lindahl, T. L. (2008), Imaging of blood plasma coagulation and its propagation at surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 85A: 1129–1134. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31529
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 MAY 2008
- Article first published online: 28 SEP 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 4 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 22 DEC 2006
- Manuscript Received: 26 JUN 2006
Funded by
- Swedish Research Council. Grant Number: K2004-71X-15060-01A
- Materials in Medicine, County Council of Östergötland, University of Linköping
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- coagulation;
- propagation;
- image processing;
- surface;
- biomaterial
Abstract
A new method utilizing image capture and processing was developed for the analysis of blood plasma coagulation at surfaces. The coagulation was detected in a cuvette by time-lapse image capture of light scattering from the developing fibrin network. By image processing and computer analysis of the captured image data, both early detection of coagulation at the surface and the propagation phase of coagulation could be measured in the same experiment. It is possible to use both platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) with the method, and thereby study the platelet contribution to both surface coagulation and propagation of coagulation. Two well-known model surfaces, hydrophilic and hydrophobic glass, were used in combination with PRP and PFP to illustrate the method. Hydrophilic glass activated coagulation significantly faster (PRP: 7.0 ± 1.7 min, PFP: 5.9 ± 1.2 min, n= 16) than hydrophobic glass (PRP: 50 ± 14 min, PFP: 65 ± 32 min, n = 16) in both PRP and PFP. Hydrophilic surfaces showed a faster initial propagation of coagulation adjacent to the surface (mean velocity: 0.14 ± 0.05 mm/ minute) compared with the propagation observed further out from the surface (mean velocity: 0.05 ± 0.01 mm/min). The method is very flexible and can be suitable for screening hemocompatibility of biomaterials. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008

1552-4965/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=343c79177ba7ba4a14e83022a135a85fff60897a)
1552-4965/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=692ae6cfb9620aaa8486b8867aa2cc1f34ef54b2)