Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the posterior mandible using cancellous bone-block allograft
Article first published online: 20 APR 2011
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33096
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Volume 97A, Issue 4, pages 509–513, 15 June 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Nissan, J., Marilena, V., Gross, O., Mardinger, O. and Chaushu, G. (2011), Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the posterior mandible using cancellous bone-block allograft. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 97A: 509–513. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33096
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 20 APR 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 FEB 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 8 JAN 2011
- Manuscript Received: 28 AUG 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- posterior atrophic mandible;
- block allograft;
- augmentation;
- histomorphometry
Abstract
The present study was conducted to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the application of cancellous bone-block allografts for the augmentation of the posterior atrophic mandible. Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent augmentation with cancellous bone-block allografts in the posterior mandible. A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm horizontally and/or vertically according to CT para-axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Following 6 months, 85 implants were placed and a cylindrical sample core was collected. All specimens were prepared for histological and histomorphometrical examination. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. Follow-up ranged 12–66 months (mean 43 ± 19 months). The mean newly formed bone was 44 ± 28%, that of the residual cancellous bone-block allograft 29 ± 24%, and of the marrow and connective tissue 27 ± 21%. Statistically significant histomorphometric differences regarding newly formed bone (69% vs. 31%, p = 0.05) were found between younger (<45 years) and older (>45 years) patients, respectively. Histomorphometric differences regarding residual cancellous bone-block allograft (17% vs. 35%) and of the marrow and connective tissue (14% vs. 34%) were not statistically significant. Cancellous bone-block allograft is biocompatible and osteoconductive, permitting new bone formation following augmentation of extremely atrophic posterior mandible with a two-stage implant placement procedure. New bone formation was age-dependent. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: , 2011.

1552-4965/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=343c79177ba7ba4a14e83022a135a85fff60897a)
1552-4965/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=692ae6cfb9620aaa8486b8867aa2cc1f34ef54b2)